Ash

18.6K posts

Ash banner
Ash

Ash

@realcryptokween

BlockNation leader. Crypto. Markets. Sports. Real talk only.

Katılım Ocak 2023
351 Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
It’s finna be my turn. I can feel that sh*t.
English
15
28
161
42.9K
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
Basically Trump said I made my billions of dollars already so it’s cool 😂😂
English
1
0
2
156
Ash retweetledi
Patrick Witt
Patrick Witt@patrickjwitt·
For the past year, I have worked diligently to get the Clarity Act passed, fulfilling President Trump’s vision to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. Last week, it was reported that I was set to leave for mandatory training as part of my service in the Georgia Army National Guard, right before Clarity hits the Senate floor. While I remain committed to fulfilling my service obligation, I am grateful to report that my training has been deferred, and that I will be able to see this effort through to the end. Thanks to @POTUS and @DavidSacks for the opportunity to continue this important work and to everyone who reached out last week. Let’s finish the job. 🇺🇸
English
454
862
7.1K
536.5K
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
@PaulHarrip2378 For sure lol so far they’ve done a bad job
English
0
0
0
41
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
I really wanna know why this autopsy for Nolan Wells is taking so long? That’s why I haven’t been trying to discuss it until more information comes out. But this is starting to look like they are dragging it out to get more money lowkey 🤷🏽‍♀️. Leave us in the dark for as long as possible while gaining empathy in the process. All the donating they all of sudden are doing is a tax deductible. Literally a week ago the mom was asking for donations because they aren’t working now a week later you’re giving out donations? Lol these people think we’re stupid. I don’t trust Al Sharpton or Ben Crump. Now he’s back peddling about the 2nd autopsy because it took 6 days to receive the body in DC. So, the only credible autopsy will be the original one in Mississippi which cannot be trusted 😒. I hope they do the right thing!
English
4
1
11
796
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
@DevotedArs You didn’t educate me. Nothing you said I did t already know. But thanks 👍🏽
English
0
0
0
9
calogero
calogero@DevotedArs·
@realcryptokween Best of luck to your future endeavors hope you’re right for your own sake. Goal wasn’t to dissuade you, my goal was to educate you on how things work in the real world. 👍
English
1
0
0
12
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
Yall still saying no reverse carry trade? lol
English
4
0
5
737
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
@DevotedArs Aye I’m done with the conversation you ain’t changing my mind so agree to disagree please stop sending me essays. Thank you 👍🏽
English
1
0
1
17
calogero
calogero@DevotedArs·
Falling back on 'everything is a secret conspiracy and the government doesn't follow laws' is an admission that you can't defend the actual mechanics of your argument. You can't claim to know the exact catalyst and timeline for a secret global migration, and then turn around and say 'nobody knows anything, we can only speculate.' You are contradicting your own theory.Furthermore, thinking a president can just ignore the rule of law to flip a switch on the global financial system completely misunderstands how corporate power works. The U.S. financial system isn't run by a single dictator; it relies on Wall Street banks, global clearinghouses, and public corporations. These institutions answer to international capital requirements, strict compliance boards, and fiduciary duties to their shareholders. No Tier-1 bank is going to risk corporate suicide and cross-border lawsuits by routing trillions onto an unlegislated blockchain network just because of a weekend emergency memo.When history repeats, it happens out in the open. When FDR banned gold in 1933, and when Nixon killed the gold standard in 1971, they didn't use an invisible system—they used public, highly disruptive executive machinery. The technology isn't new, but the legal architecture required to run a global superpower on it is. That's not political theater; it's the reality of how sovereign power operates. If your entire theory requires believing in an untouchable shadow cabal to make sense, it doesn't make sense.
English
1
0
0
40
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
These technologies aren’t new, you’re speaking as though they just discovered this technology. You yourself even said history repeats. & to think the American government does things by the book is even more hilarious especially with the current president. NOBODY other than the folks running this world knows how and when this stuff happens. All anybody in this entire space including you can do for now is speculate.
English
1
0
1
28
calogero
calogero@DevotedArs·
You are fundamentally confusing software testing with legal, systemic execution. Of course banks have been running pilots and testing systems—that’s called Research & Development. But a bank testing a network in a closed sandbox does not give the U.S. Treasury the legal authority to overnight migrate the global reserve currency onto it. Your example of the GENIUS Act actually completely dismantles your own point. The reason the Fed, FDIC, and OCC just missed their July 18, 2026, rulemaking deadline is because they are legally bound by administrative law. They can't just bypass the process with an 'emergency meeting.' They are forced to wait for public comment windows on anti-money laundering and customer ID provisions to close in August. If a federal agency tried to force a new system through arbitrary 'emergency regulations' without completing the legally required statutory process, the entire migration would be halted by federal courts on day one. Furthermore, thinking this multi-year institutional grind is just 'political theater' to keep retail investors from timing the market is a total myth. Global superpowers do not manage the infrastructure of a $35+ trillion bond market around the trading habits of retail crypto investors. The timeline is dictated by slow, rigid bureaucracy and administrative law, which is why the system cannot—and will not—just flip a switch during a weekend panic.
English
2
0
1
41
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
Testing and piloting doesn’t start after clarity. They are doing these things WITHOUT legislation being in place. They literally just missed the GENIUS deadline for clear rules. Testing/pilots has happened or IS happening RIGHT NOW. This stuff is done, what you’re seeing right now is political theater because they don’t want retail investors to time this market. They have a timeline, catalyst of when they will fully implement these systems. So, yes they can get this done and get this going with emergency meetings and emergency regulations.
English
1
0
1
38
calogero
calogero@DevotedArs·
Saying they would just 'hold emergency meetings and create emergency regulations' shows a massive misunderstanding of both administrative law and engineering. First, from a legal standpoint, federal agencies cannot just invent brand-new economic systems during a crisis. Emergency regulations must be rooted in existing statutory law passed by Congress. Without bills like the CLARITY or GENIUS Acts already signed into effective law, agencies like the SEC and the Fed lack the constitutional authority to rewrite global banking custody and settlement rules on a whim. Second, from an infrastructure standpoint, you cannot code, test, secure, and deploy a global cryptographic financial network during a weekend meeting. Tier-1 banks and Fedwire mainframes require years of deep software integration and node architecture to safely settle trillions of dollars on-chain. An emergency pen-stroke cannot magically upgrade the entire planet’s banking software by Monday morning. When an existential crisis hits, emergency meetings are used to stop the bleeding, not to build brand-new infrastructure. They will use the only tool that is already operationally wired and legally authorized: printing trillions of legacy fiat dollars to paper over the crack, while the actual blockchain legislation is forced to grind through the proper bureaucratic channels
English
1
0
0
36
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
@TrinityAshcroft It’s common sense. Honestly, this should’ve been law ages ago lol
English
0
0
1
13
Trinity Nicholette Ashcroft
Trinity Nicholette Ashcroft@TrinityAshcroft·
I’m still having a hard time understanding why people are fighting so hard against showing ID to vote in a federal election. It’s a privilege and a right as a citizen to be able to vote. Like so many others have said the only reason you would not want to have people show ID is because you want to cheat.
English
1
0
1
19
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
@DevotedArs Or they’d hold emergency meetings thus creating emergency regulations.
English
1
0
1
33
calogero
calogero@DevotedArs·
You are completely missing the distinction between a desperate panic-response and a structural systemic migration. Nixon didn't strategically 'switch systems' in 1971—he broke the existing one because the vault was empty, and then left the U.S. economy floating in total chaos for three years until the petrodollar deal was finally put together in 1974. Stopping a run on gold required nothing more than a stroke of a pen because it was a subtraction of a service. Migrating the entire U.S. economy to an on-chain blockchain infrastructure is an addition. You cannot manifest a highly complex, cryptographically secure, legally compliant global financial network overnight during a weekend panic-meeting. That is why the legal guardrails like the CLARITY and GENIUS Acts are being fiercely debated in the Senate right now. Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, and institutional clearing houses cannot operationally or legally interact with these digital assets until those frameworks are effective law. If a massive systemic crisis hits tomorrow, the government's panic-response won't be a magical, unlegislated leap into crypto; it will be the exact same tool they always use—printing trillions of legacy fiat dollars to patch the hull while the actual blockchain legislation grinds through the bureaucratic machine.
English
2
0
3
41
Ash retweetledi
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
NEWS: Keir Starmer officially has resigned as the Prime Minister of the UK
English
98
136
2.8K
213.3K
Ash
Ash@realcryptokween·
@DevotedArs You just proved my point and described problems/issue that transpired to change. Nixon took us off gold to prevent a run on American gold. He didn’t just do it and not have reasoning to back it up. But okay 👍🏽
English
1
0
1
35
calogero
calogero@DevotedArs·
Saying a government 'can't just switch systems without a reason' completely ignores how macroeconomic history actually works. Superpowers change systems when they are backed into a corner and have no other choice. Look at 1971. Nixon didn't voluntarily or calmly phase out gold because he wanted a cool new petrodollar system. He did it overnight because France and West Germany were actively draining Fort Knox of our gold reserves, and the U.S. was facing a hard structural default. The petrodollar deal with Saudi Arabia didn’t even happen until 1974. For three years, the U.S. bled in economic chaos because Nixon broke the system out of absolute desperation without a backup plan. The 'reason' for a blockchain migration today isn't a progressive desire for transparency—it's survival. The $35+ trillion debt loop is mathematically terminal. Just like Nixon blamed 'foreign speculators' in 1971 instead of admitting the U.S. dollar was broken, Washington today will never say 'the bond market is cooked.' They will market the on-chain migration as a strategic move for 'transparency' and 'catching bad actors' to mask the fact that they are forced to restructure the architecture of the entire global reserve system to stay alive.
English
1
0
2
45