Reckless Satoshi

@proofofsteph @peachbitcoin @RoboSats @capoczino @capoczino Just opened an issue to start working on this topic. Looking forward to cooperate! github.com/Reckless-Satos…

@recksato @peachbitcoin @RoboSats @capoczino

I am super excited to announce that we built a new Bitcoin peer2peer marketplace on a mobile application for the European market!!! @peachbitcoin 🍑 - beta version - welcome to the Bitcoin world! Peach aims to make stacking sats p2p the standard 💥 More about Peach 👇

@L0laL33tz @FloralWater7 @RoboSats However, there might certainly be some reasons why this is not liked by robots (peers). It hinder speediness if the "seller" cannot get confirmation from the designated entity of fiat reception quickly. It might also affect dispute resolution badly for the sats seller.

@L0laL33tz @FloralWater7 @RoboSats I think it will depend on the case/purpose. It is your trade peer who will send the bank transfer (not robosats), so as a "Sats seller" you can ask your peer to include the reference in the bank transfer.

So who here is working on @RoboSats

@pseudotoshi @SahilC0 @BTCsessions @RoboSats @umbrel Backend can be used for paying/receiving by installing a WebLN extension. Future updates of the node client will do things that cannot be implemented for plain Tor Browser. E.g., keeping track of past robots and tokens if enabled, or seamless switch to I2P if TOR is slow.

@SahilC0 @BTCsessions @RoboSats @umbrel Outside of skipping the tor browser I guess there isn't much point. Would be cool if it used the node as a backend for generating addresses tho.

👀

RoboSats is now WebLN compatible ⚡️ You can try it out with @getAlby 🐝It can be connected to your node to directly interact with RoboSats. No more QR scanning. This feature was implemented by @koala_sat as part of the ⚡️developer rewards program ⚡️ for 200K Sats. Thank you!!

@asanoha_gold @colombo003 @RoboSats @umbrel Usually it should just work by starting the Orbot proxy, then open the onion address on Safari or DuckDuckGo.

@recksato @colombo003 @RoboSats @umbrel Just tried Orbit and safari, no luck:/

RoboSats is now available as an app on your @umbrel node ☂️🤖

@SpiritofLucifer @decentralized_b @RoboSats @umbrel @Red_Purdy @runcitadel @start9labs I put together the RoboSats for @runcitadel but did not get time to test it. github.com/Reckless-Satos… Someone with a running Citadel node willing to test if this works as intended? Then we open a PR.

@RoboSats is now merged and available in the @umbrel app store. Awesome work from @recksato and all Robots that work on that. What a great job from @Red_Purdy in all the gallery images 💪💪💪💪💪💪

@asanoha_gold @colombo003 @RoboSats @umbrel Use Orbot + Safari. Onion Browser does not support Websockets, it's kind of broken and not well maintained.

@colombo003 @RoboSats @umbrel I’ve tried this but it does not seem to work on Onion Browser. Do you work for RoboSats?

@asanoha_gold @RoboSats @umbrel Since day one. Just install Tor Browser on Android, or use Orbot + Safari on Iphone. Very well tested.

@RoboSats @umbrel Will we ever be able to use RoboSats on mobile phones?

@SovereignPlebs @RoboSats @umbrel Yes hub.docker.com/r/recksato/rob… I f you want to build from Dockerfile and context (note: you must build the main.js bundle yourseulf) github.com/Reckless-Satos…

@MonetaryFrame @RoboSats I would rather simply use "Sats" and "Wallets", since these are native to users. Then only make the distinction for the low privacy ones (e.g. "surveilled Sats" "surveilled wallets"). It might make communication hard if you want to specify further "not-surveilled Sats" 😅

@MonetaryFrame @RoboSats I rather not associate negative terms with positive qualities. "unregistered sats" is in line with "unhosted wallets". Both sound as if there is "a proper way" (the gvmt controlled one) that is not followed.

It's demeaning to ourselves to define the "kind of" Bitcoin we want as the negative of some legal jargon. Giving up on using terms like "no-KYC" "w/o KYC" or "KYC-free". We simply want pure OKYC: Only you Know Your Coins.

@decentralized_b @lunaticoin A ver si alguien nos ilumina. Ciertamente cada nodo tiene que verificar el hash antes de re-enviarlo, introduciendo mayor latencia. Pero entiendo que nodos PoS tambien deben verificar nuevos bloques.

@recksato @lunaticoin No estoy muy metido en PoS, pero creo que en PoS la velocidad de propagación de bloques puede ser más rápida ya que los criterios del consenso son diferentes, al menos eso he leído, pero puedo estar equivocado A ver si alguien con más conocimiento en PoS me corrige

Pregunta para los que estén en contra del PoW como mecanismo de consenso en sistemas distribuidos abiertos: ¿Qué tiene de malo? si es que tiene algo de malo 🤭

@decentralized_b @lunaticoin Entiendo que @lunaticoin indica que la velocidad de propagación de bloques es independiente de si son creados con PoW/PoS. También tengo entendido que es así. Quizá haya protocolos específicos para aumentar la velocidad de propagación, aunque es independiente de validación PoS.

@lunaticoin Sin ser experto, hablando del consenso en sistemas distribuidos basado en PoW, el tiempo de propagación de info (latencia) es importante para varios factores, asegurar su recepción, evitar ataques DDOS, bifurcaciones, y otras cosas Por lo q no escalan igual de rápido que otras

@SovereignPlebs @RoboSats OKYC corn * Congrats! 🚀

@benthecarman Usually I2P does not need to be "instead of TOR", but in addition of TOR. I no downside. We exposed RoboSats frontend over I2P months ago and it worked flawlessly so far. I can't say whether it fits Vortex, because on your site says it is a secret :)

What are people's thoughts on I2P. Tor has been having so many issues lately, would something like Vortex benefit from being I2P native instead of tor?

106. Right? #maxisclub #Maximalist #Bitcoin #bitcoinmaximalist #bitcoinlovers #Bitcoin2022 #tothemoon #bitcoincomic #pepethefrog #pepethefrogmeme #HODL #HODLers #bitcoinmeme