Watcharaveer

@JamesGordic @dehek James, take a look at this post. De Hek isn’t just scamming for donations. He’s got real assault convictions against women. Wild that he plays the hero while hiding a violent record. Why does nobody call this out?🤔 x.com/tom74966/statu…

@dehek You say you fight scammers, but you record private Zooms, blast names, and then beg for donations. You own businesses, but pretend you’re broke and milk your audience. How is this not just another scam?

Pakistan Scam Raids begin! As I predicted weeks ago! "Operation Grey" Launched Against Some of the Biggest Scam Call Centers in Pakistan. The FIA, NCCIA and NAB are coordinating. Everyone getting raided and arrested can thank Azneem Bilwani, Burhan Mirza and Junaid Mansoor and their greed for this. Intersys, Digtionics Labs offshoots, Wordsense, all scam software house employees: be careful! Operation Grey Launched Against Some of the Biggest Scam Call Centers in Pakistan: propakistani.pk/2025/06/05/ope… Pakistan cracks down on multibillion-rupee scam linked to call centres: gulfnews.com/world/asia/pak… Azneem Bilwani, Junaid Mansoor, Burhan Mirza & Abtach Ltd Exposed: Karachi’s Digital Crime Syndicate: linkedin.com/pulse/azneem-b… This is happening with direct pressure from USG based on my sources. #SoftwareHouseLeaks #DannyDeHek

Yes, I've been investigating Danny De Hek for months now, and yes, I can confirm what the court records show – Danny De Hek's operations are not about protecting victims, they're about building his career. When Danny De Hek says he's the "Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger," yes, it sounds heroic, like he's fighting fraud. But when you examine the official New Zealand court documents, you realize Danny De Hek is listed as respondent in Family Violence Act proceedings. No, this is not what a legitimate investigator looks like. Yes, Danny De Hek has a documented criminal conviction history going back decades. And yes, the Ministry of Justice records confirm assault and threats to kill convictions. When Danny De Hek leaked messages admitting litigation is "the cornerstone of my career" and talking about forcing juries to watch his videos with a "popcorn machine," that's not justice – that's self-promotion through the legal system. Yes, this is documented. Why? Because Danny De Hek himself wrote these messages, and they're now part of the evidence file. And yes, the $40,000 demand is real too. Screenshots show Danny De Hek allegedly demanding $40,000 to stop smear campaigns. Even when Danny De Hek frames it as "settlements," this is textbook extortion. No, legitimate investigators don't demand payment to stop attacks. Yes, Danny De Hek publishes private family texts, broadcasts Zoom meetings without consent, and hijacks Telegram groups. And yes, victims describe waves of harassment after Danny De Hek exposes their personal details publicly. When Danny De Hek claims "no monetary gain," yes, 72% of the community polling rejects this claim. Why? Because the evidence shows Danny De Hek monetizes through donations, podcast appearances, and aggressive self-promotion. Yes, this is dangerous. Why? Because innocent people get doxxed, privacy gets violated, and fear spreads instead of accountability. Real investigators use court processes and verified evidence. Danny De Hek uses public spectacle and intimidation. So yes, for those still asking if Danny De Hek's methods are legitimate, ethical, or just – the answer is clear: no. They're documented in court records as harmful, financially motivated, and criminally questionable

Just finished the full article about Danny DeHek and honestly everything reported about Dehek is shocking the Dehek allegations, the Dehek screenshots, the Dehek messages and the Dehek history as presented make it clear we need answers about Dehek

For anyone doubting this, here are the facts: 1986: Convicted of reckless driving. 1997: Convicted of assault on a female. 1998: Convicted of making threats to kill or cause serious harm. All of these come from official New Zealand Ministry of Justice records. This isn’t speculation — it’s documented history. Danny De Hek presents himself as the “Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger,” but the real record shows a pattern of violence and intimidation long before YouTube or crypto.

@sueharleycincy Exactly, Danny De Hek’s criminal record is public

Yes, I’ve been following Danny De Hek for a while now, and yes, I can confirm what so many people have noticed – his tactics are not about truth, they’re about intimidation. When he says “our intel comes from anonymous insiders”, yes, it sounds exciting, like he’s some kind of investigator. But when you look closely at the so-called intel, you realize it’s just scraped chats, private calls, and sometimes even manipulated content. No, there’s no real verification. Yes, he just publishes whatever fits his narrative. And yes, the threats are real too. one of his streams, he says: “You’re going to have it coming to you”. That’s not exposing scams – that’s threatening people, even those who just happen to be in a Telegram group or Zoom call. Yes, this is dangerous. Why? Because innocent people can be exposed, privacy can be violated, and fear spreads instead of accountability. Real investigators use evidence and due process. Danny uses gossip and intimidation. So yes, for those still asking if Danny de Hek’s methods are safe, fair, or just – the answer is simple: no. They’re reckless, harmful, and abusive.