R

2K posts

R

R

@reeesh24

Psychoanalysis and that’s pretty much it (formerly psychoanalysis and more). But still sometimes veering off into “more”

Katılım Şubat 2022
927 Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
R
R@reeesh24·
@ailesauvent This is my own work, unpublished.
English
1
0
11
1.1K
R
R@reeesh24·
Therapy under capitalism.
R tweet media
English
7
394
2.7K
53.6K
R
R@reeesh24·
@sabbatheyes This is my own work, unpublished.
English
1
0
23
1.5K
Lais
Lais@sabbatheyes·
@reeesh24 Can I ask where this is from?
English
1
0
9
1.7K
R
R@reeesh24·
@sleepyalexi @mogjaar This is my own work, unpublished. But definitely inspired by Todd’s.
English
1
0
1
101
R
R@reeesh24·
We are all dealing with the exact same thing in an extremely singular way.
English
1
6
42
1.9K
R
R@reeesh24·
I lived in NYC for 2+ years, and it was absolutely awful. But I also have an unquestionable attachment to the city I grew up in, so I get you sickos.
English
0
0
4
539
R
R@reeesh24·
@dkeosnwjdieo The summons of love, page 32.
English
0
0
4
261
JP
JP@dkeosnwjdieo·
@reeesh24 source?
English
1
0
0
290
R
R@reeesh24·
Mari Ruti with one of the most important insights written by a psychoanalytic writer.
R tweet media
English
3
45
288
7.7K
R
R@reeesh24·
“The ground, which first presented itself to us as the sublation of the contradiction, thus appears as a new contradiction. But as such it is not something persisting [Beharrende] peacefully in itself but rather the repelling [Abstoßen] of itself from itself.” -Hegel
English
0
0
4
435
R
R@reeesh24·
@the_mel_jar Lacan talking about A Room of One’s Own would have slapped.
English
1
0
2
146
Mel
Mel@the_mel_jar·
Please be assured that I have many very serious disagreements with Lacan. For example, I truly wish that if he had to choose an English language Modernist writer to freak out over, then he should have chosen Virginia Woolf over James Joyce. Very seriously dying on this hill.
English
5
1
41
2.5K
R
R@reeesh24·
“If Kant's motto for enlightenment was Sapere Aude, dare to know, the challenge of Jesus was Amare Aude, dare to love, above all where you do not know.” -Richard Boothby
English
0
0
4
343
R
R@reeesh24·
@_not_all_ I don’t doubt that at all. It just feels as if psychoanalyst’s writing about the body is a cheat code. One that I enjoy.
English
1
0
1
40
Reem ❀
Reem ❀@_not_all_·
@reeesh24 i am probably biased because i have read the essay, but i do think the quote is credible upon taking the context of the entirety of the essay (and its clearly constructed arguments) into consideration.
English
1
0
2
52
R
R@reeesh24·
There’s definitely use in this I’m sure. But sometimes it feels like psychoanalytic writers can write anything about the body with poetic language and it sounds credible. Hair follicles flow in the wind, leaning towards our unconscious loves, leading the way, without a word.
Aziz S̸𓅒@Psy_Lacanian

Our hands are not the obedient servants that they seem to be… Through conscious and unconscious gesture, they reveal our deepest psychology, our weaknesses and obsessions, our personal history and our social conditioning. — Darian Leader, Hands

English
1
0
11
1K
R
R@reeesh24·
Capital always wins. It has to. For the better or for the worse of life & death situations. But always for the worse of the unfolding of history.
English
0
0
3
236
R
R@reeesh24·
Sex is completely foreign to us, especially the more we think we know about it. So it seems like the perfect reduction point for all of humanity.
English
0
1
9
660
R
R@reeesh24·
No shit.
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

🚨BREAKING: MIT hooked people up to brain scanners while they used ChatGPT. What they found should concern every single person reading this. ChatGPT users showed 55% weaker brain connectivity than people who didn't use it. Not after years. After just four months. Here's how they tested it. 54 people were split into three groups: one used ChatGPT to write essays, one used Google, and one used nothing but their own brain. They wore EEG monitors that tracked their brain activity in real time across four sessions over four months. The brain-only group built the strongest, most widespread neural networks. Google users were in the middle. ChatGPT users had the weakest brains in the room. Every time. Then the memory test hit. Participants were asked to recall what they'd just written minutes earlier. 83% of ChatGPT users couldn't quote a single line from their own essay. They wrote it. They couldn't remember it. The words passed through them like they were never there. It gets worse. In the final session, ChatGPT users were told to write without AI. Their brains were measurably weaker than people who never used AI at all. 78% still couldn't recall their own writing. The damage didn't go away when the tool was removed. Meanwhile, brain-only users who tried ChatGPT for the first time? Their brains lit up. They wrote better prompts. They retained more. Their brains were already strong enough to use AI as a tool instead of a crutch. The researchers also found that every ChatGPT essay on the same topic looked almost identical. More facts, more dates, more names. But less original thinking. Everyone using ChatGPT produced the same generic output while believing it was their own. MIT gave this a name: cognitive debt. Like financial debt, you borrow convenience now and pay with your thinking ability later. Except there's no way to pay it back. The question isn't whether ChatGPT is useful. It's whether the price is your ability to think without it.

English
0
1
5
640
R
R@reeesh24·
“the more that technoscientific mediation reduces existence to meaningless mathematized materiality, the more tightly will human beings cling to religious supplements as apparent anchors of meaning within a sea of senselessness.” -Adrian Johnston
English
0
3
18
935
R
R@reeesh24·
You know, a part of me needs so bad for it to be true that Trump is miserable behind the scenes. But needing it to be true largely because if it wasn’t, everything I believe about the world would simply cease to exist.
English
0
0
2
611