
Ciaran O'Loughlin
2.1K posts

Ciaran O'Loughlin
@Reframe_Reality
Believer in the power of good ideas.
Valencia, Spain Katılım Ocak 2026
56 Takip Edilen101 Takipçiler

@jack_schroder_ Curcumin, EGCG and turkey tail extract.
English


@Reframe_Reality @JMer3963 @Lewis_Bollard You're being ridiculous now and talking nonsense. Bye. All the best.
English

This is a pig who spent years confined in a gestation crate. She was left behind when factory farms flooded in Iowa and then rescued by some volunteers.
The volunteers took her home and dug her a mud pit. She ignored it. They assumed years of confinement had extinguished her natural instincts.
Then they noticed her wandering into the woods on their property. They followed her — and found her rooting in a pile of dirt, digging her own mud pit.
The pork industry claims pigs adapt to confinement. They don't. Inside every gestation crate is an animal who still yearns to root, wallow, and just be a pig.
This is the tragedy of factory farming. We tried to reduce feeling animals to machines. We failed.

English

@jan_fifi @JMer3963 @Lewis_Bollard They also live an unnecessary death that they wouldn't live otherwise
English

@Reframe_Reality @JMer3963 @Lewis_Bollard They die an unnecessary death, and certainly not a better death.
English

@Reframe_Reality @JMer3963 @Lewis_Bollard Not talking about wild animals, cows, pigs, sheep, chickens are hardly wild.
English

@fanoonman @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez It cannot be healthy. Vegans literally have to take supplements. So many people stop doing it due to health problems.
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez (1.5) Clarification: I believe a diet free from animal proteins CAN BE healthy. I don't think any diet is automatically healthy just because it doesn't contain animal proteins. There's outright junk food with and without animal products in it. Fair enough?
English

Yes, our social and cultural evolution as a species has had an enormous effect on our biology... Do you think there was not a process of natural selection that took place after we began hunting? After we began farming? As a result of our changing practices. The two things go completely hand in hand and influence one another indefinitely.
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez (4) "Society" may make it challenging to "survive" without a car, a computer, a bank account, etc., but does "social evolution" change us *biologically* to where we NEED to consume certain things we previously didn't need, even by your own admission? You brought it up...
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez (2) You pay for a 280-extender, but you still didn't reply to my request to clarify what you meant by "we did not socially evolve to NEED cigarettes to survive." What point did I make that you think that refutes? Do we "socially evolve" to "NEED" *anything* "to survive"?
English

@fanoonman @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez You made the argument that if eating meat is natural, why is it so difficult. But it's not. That's my point.
And in fact, most of the stuff you eat to stay alive is more difficult to eat than meat.
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez "Evolved" to be more like lions? Absolutely not.
Yes, I believe a diet free from animal proteins is healthy -- although you wouldn't have to go that far to avoid meat. I'm not picking any animal to eat EXACTLY like. You keep strawmanning my points because you can't refute them.
English

@fanoonman @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez Do you believe a diet free from animal proteins is healthy? Do you believe that eating the same diet as a monkey is healthy? Do you feel we have evolved beyond that point?
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez (3) You imply that humans "socially evolve" into having new PHYSICAL needs to consume certain things just to physically SURVIVE. How does that occur, biochemically/physiologically? Even if you mean "social 'survival'", I'm here in society talking with you, and not eating meat.
English

@fanoonman @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez I'm saying that eating gazelle is not particularly difficult. You're implying eating meat is unnatural because of the difficulty level. Well not really, because we've managed it for tens of thousands of years! There's nothing complex or unnatural about it at all.
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez (4) You say, "Lions can eat gazelle but can't peel bananas. Monkeys can peel bananas and could probably eat gazelle if they needed/wanted to. They don't." Why don't they? Which of the two are humans closer to, biologically? Why use the one we're not as a dietary role model?
English

I don't think "rights" are relevant to the conversation, especially when talking about animals like chickens. I think we have to make our own decisions on what is or isn't appropriate or moral, and I don't think there's a simple answer like "meat = bad" or "meat = good". I think that's fast food ethics.
English

@Reframe_Reality @Lewis_Bollard On your view, does this fact give people the right to kill them when they're young and healthy?
English

Lions can eat gazelle but can't peel bananas. Monkeys can peel bananas and could probably eat gazelle if they needed/wanted to. They don't. But if you believe a diet of just fruit is healthy for a human then be my guest, tuck in. But there's no way in hell I'm putting my body through that.
Secondly, we did not socially evolve to NEED cigarettes to survive. Go and tell an indigenous hunter gatherer tribe to stop eating animal products and live off just fruit..see what they tell you.
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez Why do you call that distinction "arbitrary"? One is simple enough that almost any human or primate could do it with ease; the other obviously takes manufactured equipment and a lot of work. I'll address 'social/biological evolution' next -- running out of space here.
English

@rumilyrics It's also like a muscle that gets stronger the more you use it.
English

@yginbar @Lewis_Bollard No, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that they wouldn't be alive in the first place if it weren't for farming. Do you see any chickens in the wild?
English

@Reframe_Reality @Lewis_Bollard That's what matters morally, yes. Of course it's sad when an animal dies, but you can't say that since all animals eventually die anyway you might as well kill them because only outcomes count.
English

To me it seems like you're drawing a kind of arbitrary difference between the act of peeling a banana and skinning an animal. Btw you don't HAVE to skin or cook them, you can eat raw meat, especially if it's recently killed.
You're also looking thousands of years of social and biological evolution to make this point. Yeah we are descended from monkeys that just ate fruit, but that isn't what we are and isn't what we have been for a very long time.
English

@Reframe_Reality @yginbar @Lewis_Bollard @PeggiBosquez (3) BTW, I'm not sure how bananas made your list. If you live where bananas grow, you pull a ripe one off of the tree and pop it open, as even children do with the ones from the store now. Primates usually peel them from the opposite end that we do, FWIW...
English

I found Blood Meridian extremely inspiring, in terms of how unique and evocative prose can be. He actually makes up his own words at some points, and for all of the poetry of the writing is actually really direct at conveying what he means at times. He cuts through the conventions of language to put an image directly into your head without any beating about the bush or adherence to orthodoxy.
All that said, I wouldn't say it's a super enjoyable read. There are fascinating moments. The ending is phenomenal. But he conveys something quite blunt overall with it.
I think the idea is good and the execution is exceptionally impressive. But I can fully understand why people wouldn't enjoy it. I'm trying to read it a second time and getting quite bored, even though if someone asked me what the best thing I've ever read is, I would probably say Blood Meridian. A lot of great stuff isn't necessarily meant to be fully enjoyed. It can serve as a reference point. The Wire is one of the best shows ever, but it's probably not as enjoyable as bunging on a good episode of Kitchen Nightmares.
English

I feel like people wouldn't be frothing at the mouth over a guy who is just not that into Cormac McCarthy if they gave up the incessant and needless desire to be fully understood and liked by others.
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️@christopherrufo
I read the first hundred pages of The Road last year, and read the first hundred pages of Blood Meridian this year, and in both instances, gave up, because the books never clicked. Lyrical writing, but the characters are reduced to way down Maslow's hierarchy, and the tone is so relentlessly bleak, with almost no humanity breaking through, it was difficult to feel anything besides the flint clicking against the cold steel in the overwhelming darkness. I know many of you love it, but to me, it's overwrought, overstylized, and overhyped.
English

@ErinPerise There's a Chinese guy making a potion out of eagle feathers somewhere
English

It’s like, when you learn a language, it’s all in print. And when people actually use a language in real life, it’s in cursive handwriting. Endings, middles and contexts often left out, abbreviated, and totally idiosyncratic to each person. Especially true of Italian. Very endearing even though it makes it much harder to learn. It’s a sign of life in the language.
English


