Yanto Kates (YNTKTS) 🍉

Anjir jadi rame pindah dari marketplace. Lagian mau-mauan diperbudak. 🤣 Kerja buat marketplace kan lama-lama. Kalau gak nurut tinggal di kill switch, toko tenggelem aja pokoknya. Lagian apa kalian gak mikir, kenapa marketplace owner ga buka toko sendiri aja? Ngapain naikin produk kalian? Kalian yakin owner2 marketplace itu gak punya toko sendiri? Senaif itukah? 😂 Ngapain naikin toko kalian, mending naikin toko dia sendiri. Cuan tebal. Kalau toko kalian mau naik ya iklan. Siapa emang yg menjamin keadilan algoritmanya? LOL

PEMUDA 22 TAHUN RAIH HAMPIR RP3 MILIAR PER BULAN DARI AIRBNB TANPA MILIKI PROPERTI Seorang pemuda berusia 22 tahun dilaporkan mampu menghasilkan sekitar $187.000 per bulan setara Rp3 miliar melalui bisnis penyewaan di Airbnb, meski tidak memiliki satu pun properti Model bisnis yang dijalankan adalah menyewa apartemen dari pemilik dengan kontrak jangka panjang, kemudian melengkapi unit tersebut dan menyewakannya kembali secara harian melalui platform Airbnb dengan tarif lebih tinggi Keuntungan diperoleh dari selisih antara biaya sewa kepada pemilik dan pembayaran dari penyewa jangka pendek Saat ini, ia telah mengelola lebih dari 30 unit properti, dengan pendapatan bulanan yang hampir mencapai $200.000 setara Rp3,2 miliar pada periode terakhir Strategi ini dijalankan tanpa pinjaman bank maupun kepemilikan aset properti, melainkan mengandalkan perjanjian sewa dan optimalisasi listing di platform digital

Treatment princess memang harus special. > inces mendapat kejutan ulang tahun pada saat kunjungan negara, diperkirakan menginap di Four Seasons Hotel George V Paris, diduga kuat menempati tipe kamar Signature Royal Suites yang saking mewahnya harga tidak dipajang di situs pemesanan dan harus ditelepon langsung. > Sebagai perbandingan, kamar tipe Duplex Suite City View saja harganya tembus Rp200 jutaan per malam dengan biaya sarapan lebih dari Rp1 juta sekali makan, sehingga kelas Royal Suites diestimasikan bisa mencapai Rp300 hingga Rp500 juta per malamnya. > Fasilitas yang didapat pun tak main-main mewahnya: teras pribadi seluas 60 meter persegi, ruang tamu dengan perapian marmer dan perabotan antik Prancis abad ke-18, kamar mandi berlapis marmer lengkap dengan steam room pribadi, hingga layanan butler 24 jam penuh yang siap siaga melayani setiap titah inces. > Jika dihitung dari total hari kunjungan di Prancis, silakan bayangkan sendiri berapa miliar uang pajak rakyat yang harus dikuras demi memfasilitasi gaya hidup mewah dan kejutan ulang tahun inces di sana. > Kejutan eksklusif dari bos besar (badannya yang besar) ini seolah menegaskan bahwa statusnya memang jauh di atas pejabat biasa (yaiyalah dambaan hati bro), sehingga fasilitas yang diberikan pun wajib memenuhi standar bangsawan Eropa.

🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now. The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left. Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops. If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time. The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy. They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand. The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker. The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own.

MARRIAGE IS SCARY😭😭AAAAA PLISS TENANGIN DIRI GW TKUTT BANGETTT YA ALLAHHHH