relentlessADD

Within the past few weeks I have: 1.) Given you a hand selected list of the best ICT charter videos for when he uploads them on December 25th, 2023 - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 2.) Given you my recommend viewing order of watching ICT if you are a beginner or not seeing the results you'd like to see - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 3.) Given you a breakdown of the runtimes of each original mentorship month so you can plan your studying - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 4.) Broken down the depth of layering and iterative teachings ICT has used for the last 10 years, using orderblocks as an example - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 5.) Taught how intermarket analysis works with Bonds and shown how it can tip the hand of news events - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 6.) Explained how to use Reaper gaps properly, and shown that they're not useless fluff - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 7.) Showed how ICT is true, algorithmic logic even to the point it can be derived - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 8.) Made multiple high probability public calls on indices, gold, and DXY. Multiple links on my profile. I don't delete posts. - here is one example x.com/relentlessADD/… 9.) Shown multiple times how the logic I've provided can be used with my AI for a quant edge - here is the link of one example x.com/relentlessADD/… 10.) Broken down the critical difference of refinement and fractal delivery - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 11.) Pointed to where the heavy majority of coaches/mentors/influencers/teachers are not showing the proper use of a breaker - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 12.) Discussed the most concise way to get the DOL and narrative I can think of - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 13.) Given a tutorial on the proper way to collect data and backtest - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 14.) Provided the best way to approach a daytrading framework from a pure ICT standpoint without unnecessary length and videos - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… 15.) Given what I consider to be the best basic ICT models available - here is the link x.com/relentlessADD/… There are more gems, and I've been answering questions non stop for weeks. I encourage you to dig into my profile. I do not do paid mentorships, I do not have a course, I do not have a monetized YouTube channel for revenue. This is all for free except my quant data/AI.

@Ed_tradess You really put your name on my homework here.

WHY MOST PEOPLE MISUNDERSTAND HOW ICT ACTUALLY TRADES... The way ICT trades is not what most people think he’s teaching. What many traders see is a mirage. I’m not saying it’s fake. I’m not saying it’s hindsight. What I’m saying is that when you see ICT annotate key PD Arrays, those markings alone mean very little. Patterns by themselves mean almost nothing. That part cannot be emphasized enough. ICT is not taking a trade simply because there’s an inverted imbalance on M15, a mitigation block, or a reclaimed M1 FVG - especially when price is already sitting at the 0.5 standard deviation of an overnight range. Context always comes first. The reality is this: ICT is using a framework to trade a narrative. PD Arrays do not define that framework. They exist to support and confirm that the framework is being executed correctly. Think of it this way: you have a narrative, and you have rules that govern how price can complete that narrative - similar to the laws of physics. PD Arrays are not the driver. They are simply the footholds along the climb. As long as the narrative and framework are aligned, those footholds work as intended. Order of operations matters. PD Arrays are just the path along the mountain, not the destination. Treating them as standalone patterns is how beginners are taught - not how professionals trade. If you trade PD Arrays and patterns for their own sake, you are setting yourself up for failure. If you believe stacking endless confluences by drilling down through fractals creates an edge, you’re already lost. Before anything else, if you don’t know where price should go and why, you’ve failed before the trade even begins.

@dennyaet Being flexible with the logic and not breaking rules is how you get to next steps in understanding for sure. Can see that with hidden FVGs logic and reapers as well.

What I've noticed ever since ICT released the Suspension Block PDArray is the narrative that it can "blend in" with the Reapers. The idea that Reaper brings in is phenomenal, we got the Balanced Price Range and Liquidity Raid. Now what can exist in the Breaker Leg? 2 Volume Imbalances with Inside Range Candle Brings in this kind of "hidden" or "additional" narrative to the already existing Reaper idea. Nothing new, just flexible logic.

@alexthebeggar Fractal delivery uses the same logic always so watch it print on a high timeframe and confirm then wait to appear on a lower timeframe. Keep it simple first.

My Twitter feed is basically an advanced ICT course made digestible. I’ve had dozens and dozens of people reach out to me to say they’ve made models, gotten funded, and gotten paid from my tweets. No sign up required but my monkey brain does like the dopamine hit of likes.

@honda_tua Then I want to see that FVG invert.”

@honda_tua Absolutely that’s why I singled the specific one to invert as a FVG. Way before it did. It presents as a candidate. Before that it presents in an area where a candidate should form. In that area on price I am thinking “I want to see a BISI form, then confirm as an FVG.

I want to point out something not usually discussed in inversion array modeling: When a PDArray fails and is reclaimed, you only give it one more shot. If it fails a third time it’s done. What happens when this M1 array I called out specifically to invert fails three times?

@dennyaet Similar yes except for me I count two failures. The BISI to the left became a reaper. High probability trade.

@relentlessADD Similar Example? Is bonus that the SIBI should've acted as BPR and "Strong FVG" and once inverted with the logic you explained becomes more "Higher Probability" than usually with context of previous BPR and reason that it gives this IOFED?

@IAAG777 To hold in order for bullish confidence.

@IAAG777 Similar yes. The reaper is a good way to start understanding the logic behind this stuff to where you don’t think “reaper” you think what it should do in if, then statements. For example in this fractal if we had formed a HH (making a reaper) then the BISI made on reclaim HAS

@SculptorsHoard I always get motivated to make videos and then never do. I have a toddler with another baby on the way. Very busy life. I like to think I’m low volume high impact. If someone compiled all my technical tweets I think people would be surprised how much meat is really there.

@relentlessADD I wish you had a youtube channel. I don't expect you to, but I can still wish it!

@YashMMXM Yes I plan to

@relentlessADD Will you trade after 15december and Whole January

First it happens on timeframe “A.” Then what?

@joeymc1993 I won’t share, not because I’m a jerk but because obvious reasons. I’m sure it’s out there. The premise is basically when you have liquidity that lines up on multiple times (very close to a HTF draw) this is how you can get in right before price snaps to it.

@joeymc1993 I would 100% be looking for setups like this and this is absolutely how I look at targeting close proximity liquidity (aka ridiculous LTF scalping). See if you can hunt down an old ICT charter commentary by a similar name “close proximity entry drills.” Should be on my list.

@dennyaet @Esterlyn_7 Denny is right. ICT has taught at one point to dynamically use bodies or wicks to better align with narrative as well. I was highlighting the overlapping discount areas on such tiny timeframes. Don’t get caught up on the bodies and wicks - truly not a big deal.

@Esterlyn_7 @relentlessADD He doesn't answer because its not that important if u use body or not, key of post is Fractal Delivery going from HTF to LTF and 1min being the HTF. I just asked cuz i was curious its nothing serious i suppose

@Serg_Trades @Topstep I’d use the one at 24,800 and higher of the two are 24,600. The reasoning is they are discount areas relative to their swing.

@relentlessADD @Topstep Which ones? explain bro 🙏

$NQ said f your FVG’s” ‼️ Me: “that’s my b for thinking I finally knew what I was doing” 😂 thanks. GG’s💀 @Topstep $MNQ

@ChainOfMemorie5 Not the same use case no, I use orange lines generically. Typically as a break, sweep, array….

@relentlessADD İs the yellow line today used for the same purpose as in your post from November 14? I dont see what the use case is and I‘m confused now after thinking I got it last time. Could you elaborate? Thank you for all your insights shared here

@its_djayyy Yes it is

@relentlessADD This is the fractal nature that you’re getting at right being that the 1m timeframe is a HTF than the 5s?

@MantaChoFU Hmm. Not sure what you’re asking. Can you try rephrasing it for me?

@relentlessADD Does the one on 15s count ? I still don't get it w/ that dealing range on 1m and 5s...is it both appear on the discount?