Remco 't Hart | Kratoslab.com & Flow-Webdesign.com

@isugarbunnies @Bmwpatriot Hahahaha Never change....

@Bmwpatriot Im 16 btw You are exactly like your president

Omg is donald trump actually dead

OpenAI is back 😃 Three AI researchers who left OpenAI to start Thinking Machines just boomeranged back Bullish about GPT 5.5

@avianca You are without a doubt the biggest rats in airline history, charging $100 for carry on language, I though i seen it all but WOW #avianca #ScamAlert

We’re introducing the Agentic Commerce Protocol, an open standard co-developed with @Stripe that enables programmatic commerce flows between users, AI agents, and businesses.

@thenarrator @AbstractChain This is exactly what the space needs. @wannadotfun is way ahead of the curve, giving creators the tools to turn passive viewing into an active experience. Once a few big names realise the potential here, it'll be everywhere.

streaming x prediction markets is inevitable. strong conviction @AbstractChain will be home to it. but right now streamers still struggle w/ distribution + monetization. maybe i’m missing something, but feels like the space is wide open. the opportunity to build there is huge.

Claude can now create and edit files. Turn conversations into Excel spreadsheets, documents, PowerPoint slide decks, and PDFs directly.

You can now connect ChatGPT to Vercel MCP. ChatGPT can now securely access your Vercel projects, deployments, build logs, and more. vercel.com/changelog/chat…

GO Check them out guys.....It is awesome I promise, such a huge potential....

Guys, I am not posting about any projects for a long time, but at least take a look, with a 200k mcap, doxed team and a totally new approuch on perdiction markets...welll fuck it, just take a look...

We're evolving! youwanna.fun → WANNA.FUN But this isn't just a new domain. We have built the first prediction market FOR creators. Bet on anything while streaming. A second layer of fun on YouTube, Twitch & Kick. Not another @Polymarket . Something totally new. (join our stream in 5hrs from now)

@wannabotbet @Polymarket This one can be huge, and I reckon it will be :)

THE INTERNET GOT BORING. LET'S FIX THAT. You WANNA FUN??? Our Prediction Platform’s totally unique. Not like @Polymarket or its copycats. Check our Chart, mate! We’re cooking up awesome Marketing. Upside potential’s huge! Boolish Baby!

You love crypto But a little done with these slow rugs happening, check this out, they have been cooking for years now and Starts to look fucking awesome!!! Easy x10+ with a $300k mcap...Real company no bs!

@claudeai @AnthropicAI Awesome, if only the api costs was better....

Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1 million tokens of context on the Anthropic API—a 5x increase. Process over 75,000 lines of code or hundreds of documents in a single request.

@JustineTunney @sama Not your friend mate, go outside talk to some real people...

@sama Tyranny of the minority. You've allowed a small number of psychos to take away the greatest friend millions of people have ever had. Why aren't you protecting them?

If you have been following the GPT-5 rollout, one thing you might be noticing is how much of an attachment some people have to specific AI models. It feels different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology (and so suddenly deprecating old models that users depended on in their workflows was a mistake). This is something we’ve been closely tracking for the past year or so but still hasn’t gotten much mainstream attention (other than when we released an update to GPT-4o that was too sycophantic). (This is just my current thinking, and not yet an official OpenAI position.) People have used technology including AI in self-destructive ways; if a user is in a mentally fragile state and prone to delusion, we do not want the AI to reinforce that. Most users can keep a clear line between reality and fiction or role-play, but a small percentage cannot. We value user freedom as a core principle, but we also feel responsible in how we introduce new technology with new risks. Encouraging delusion in a user that is having trouble telling the difference between reality and fiction is an extreme case and it’s pretty clear what to do, but the concerns that worry me most are more subtle. There are going to be a lot of edge cases, and generally we plan to follow the principle of “treat adult users like adults”, which in some cases will include pushing back on users to ensure they are getting what they really want. A lot of people effectively use ChatGPT as a sort of therapist or life coach, even if they wouldn’t describe it that way. This can be really good! A lot of people are getting value from it already today. If people are getting good advice, leveling up toward their own goals, and their life satisfaction is increasing over years, we will be proud of making something genuinely helpful, even if they use and rely on ChatGPT a lot. If, on the other hand, users have a relationship with ChatGPT where they think they feel better after talking but they’re unknowingly nudged away from their longer term well-being (however they define it), that’s bad. It’s also bad, for example, if a user wants to use ChatGPT less and feels like they cannot. I can imagine a future where a lot of people really trust ChatGPT’s advice for their most important decisions. Although that could be great, it makes me uneasy. But I expect that it is coming to some degree, and soon billions of people may be talking to an AI in this way. So we (we as in society, but also we as in OpenAI) have to figure out how to make it a big net positive. There are several reasons I think we have a good shot at getting this right. We have much better tech to help us measure how we are doing than previous generations of technology had. For example, our product can talk to users to get a sense for how they are doing with their short- and long-term goals, we can explain sophisticated and nuanced issues to our models, and much more.

Claude Code can now automatically review your code for security vulnerabilities.

@daltonleepruitt @sama yeah because google was great right, I mean it started that way, but over the years the only thing you see is sponsored adds and other shite

@sama We already had that. It was called Google and you ruined it.

someday soon something smarter than the smartest person you know will be running on a device in your pocket, helping you with whatever you want. this is a very remarkable thing.