@repliCATSproject

560 posts

@repliCATSproject banner
@repliCATSproject

@repliCATSproject

@replicats

Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science @unimelb #repliCATS2021 RT ≠ endorsement. Banner: By Lucinda, @SketchGrp Admin: @siminevazire @fallonmody

Melbourne, Victoria Katılım Mart 2019
66 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
@repliCATSproject
@repliCATSproject@replicats·
We've wrapped up our data collection for the SCORE program! Here's an animation we created to share what we've achieved, and also what comes next (warning: contains cats & some ambitious future plans)⤵️ youtu.be/qa2_9NrEmeA
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
15
38
0
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
simine vazire
simine vazire@siminevazire·
If you’re coming to SIPS in Nairobi in two weeks, consider signing up for repliCATS and get $250 to do some in-person peer reviews with other attendees for a few hours!
@repliCATSproject@replicats

Hey everyone, we have 5 spots left for our in-person repliCATS workshop in Nairobi! Help us evaluate preprints, with US$250 travel grants for all participants. Express interest: forms.gle/j6ExqJo4MCAPec… Please RT/share #sips2024 #metascience

English
0
8
20
3.6K
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
simine vazire
simine vazire@siminevazire·
Really exciting new project. I think this is the kind of thing that the public assumes is really common in science - it’s not, yet, but I hope this helps us get there.
ERROR@error_reviews

Error checking is an important service to science, but it doesn't pay the bills. But what if it did? Introducing ERROR, a bug bounty program for science to systematically detect and report errors in academic publications error.reviews

English
1
13
60
8.5K
@repliCATSproject
@repliCATSproject@replicats·
Going to SPSP2024? The repliCATS team is running a peer review workshop led by @fidlerfm @siminevazire 🗓️ 10 Feb 1-5pm ❔ Review psych preprints using our structured protocol 👩‍💻 Work in groups 💰 US$120 for participants + Timtams To register: spsp.wufoo.com/forms/spsp-2...
@repliCATSproject tweet media
English
3
7
9
13.4K
@repliCATSproject
@repliCATSproject@replicats·
The repliCATS team will run a hands-on PD session at #SPSP to develop formal training in peer review using our structured protocol, conducting reviews on psychology preprints! US$120 travel grants to support in-person attendance! Sign up via SPSP: spsp.wufoo.com/forms/spsp-202…
Society for Personality and Social Psychology@SPSPnews

🚨Registration for the SPSP 2024 Annual Convention is now open!🚨 Visit our website below to register for the event and click on "Plan Your Trip" to book a hotel room. See you at #SPSP2024 (virtually or in San Diego) in February 2024! 🔗: ow.ly/HJR550PQQNl

English
0
3
5
1.5K
@repliCATSproject
@repliCATSproject@replicats·
We're SUPER excited to be collaborating with COS, evaluating the reliability of preprints in psych & adjacent disciplines. We're kicking off with a pilot workshop before AIMOS2023 in Brisbane. 🗓️ Mon, 20 Nov 💰 AU $150 🥯🍫🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛ EOI: go.unimelb.edu.au/v29s
English
1
3
12
9.3K
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
simine vazire
simine vazire@siminevazire·
Read this. There is a lot of fear of too much criticism in psychology, talk of protecting ECRs from this threat, etc. What about protecting ECRs from the damage of being silenced or worse when they raise legitimate criticism of famous people’s work? Excellent piece by @ZoeZiani
Zoé Ziani, Ph.D.@ZoeZiani

I wrote a post-mortem on the Gino-Ariely scandal: How I came to suspect Gino’s work, the resistance I met during my Ph.D., my experience working with Data Colada, and the lessons I hope business academia will learn from it. theorgplumber.com/posts/statemen…

English
2
21
93
15.9K
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
Dr Hannah Fraser
Dr Hannah Fraser@HannahSFraser·
@Nature news just published a story about the implications our preprint showing how vulnerable results are to analytic choices. Check it out here! nature.com/articles/d4158…
Dr Hannah Fraser@HannahSFraser

In incredible news, our preprint (ecoevorxiv.org/repository/vie…) has now been downloaded >7500 times from EcoEvoRXiv in the last week! We show that ecological results are very sensitive to who analyses the data and how they do it.

English
1
17
40
4.7K
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
Dr Hannah Fraser
Dr Hannah Fraser@HannahSFraser·
In incredible news, our preprint (ecoevorxiv.org/repository/vie…) has now been downloaded >7500 times from EcoEvoRXiv in the last week! We show that ecological results are very sensitive to who analyses the data and how they do it.
Dr Hannah Fraser@HannahSFraser

So excited to release this work into the wild. Thank you so much to the 300 odd researchers who contributed to the project. And especially to my joint-first-authors @TimParker88, @Elliot_Gould_ for putting in a terrifying number of hours on this

English
1
16
54
9.6K
@repliCATSproject retweetledi
Elliot Gould
Elliot Gould@Elliot_Gould_·
Wowee! Proud to FINALLY share our preprint from the ManyEcoEvo project. Read on to find out just how much variation there is when researchers analyse the same dataset to answer the same research question #metascience #ecology #evolution
Tim Parker@TimParker88

When many different researchers analyze the same data, results vary .... A LOT! Our Many-Analysts study from ecology and evo-bio is FINALLY up on @ecoevorxiv doi.org/10.32942/X2GG62 Thanks to the HUNDREDS of researchers who made this study possible.

English
0
4
20
1.3K