Rev Cap

192 posts

Rev Cap banner
Rev Cap

Rev Cap

@rev_cap

Cyclicals Investor on sabbatical

Katılım Eylül 2021
2.5K Takip Edilen29.4K Takipçiler
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
A 5 sigma selling day and stocks are down 25bps
English
10
5
163
14.9K
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
Unsanctioning Iranian oil doesn’t mean letting the IRGC collect dollars it means seal team six taking possession of Iranian tankers at sea. I thought that was obvious.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47

.@SecScottBessent: In the coming days, we may unsanction the Iranian oil that's on the water. It's about 140 million barrels, so depending how you count it, that's 10 days to 2 weeks of supply, that the Iranians had been pushing out, that would have all gone to China. In essence, we'd be using the Iranian barrels against the Iranians to keep the price down for the next 10 or 14 days, as we continue this campaign. So, we have lots of levers.

English
41
73
549
55.1K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@TMTLongShort The idea Bessent and Trump are in control of this situation is … not particularly credible
English
0
0
1
174
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@Brian_A_E Stocks were down 25bps today and are now up from the day before if you include the after hours
English
0
0
1
113
Nairartnoc
Nairartnoc@KahlVados·
@rev_cap Unless you have an argument for why we will not have a TACO, you're just adding to the scare narrative. It's like tariffs in the spring of 2025 or AI is over in the fall.
English
3
0
0
257
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
Oil +6% overnight on Saudi oil infrastructure shut ins Stocks flat still waiting for their TACO, even after Powell was about as hawkish as the all time most dovish Fed chair could be Me to equity longs this morning
GIF
English
5
3
154
9.7K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@blueprintsmb22 We’ve just run extreme deficits now for 6 years and had so much nominal GDP growth that everyone thinks it’s normal It’s actually pretty abnormal versus most times in history But I’m sure big tech will come out better than SMB from this
English
1
0
1
388
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@blueprintsmb22 Certainly a big piece of it. No exposure to commodities. Control their costs. Secular demand tailwind But they are having to spend a ton on capex right now to not lose their leadership and demand to support an ROI is still sensitive to the broader backdrop
English
1
0
7
966
Blueprintsmb
Blueprintsmb@blueprintsmb22·
The news flow is so bad and futures are flat. Remarkable. Shows you that having 7 stocks 1/3 of the index more levered to AI capex trends and opex efficiency means the stock market has never been less connected to what’s actually happening in the economy (no private jobs) and geopolitically. Wild. If futures were down 2-3 pct, I would be like yeah seems reasonable.
GIF
English
5
1
31
4.2K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@Rory_Johnston How could he even do that at this point? If he TACOs oil probably rips even more because the bull case is the US militarily takes control of the strait
English
8
1
36
4.1K
Rory Johnston
Rory Johnston@Rory_Johnston·
I still think Trump will TACO—because he *has* to TACO. Oil loss it too big, too politically untenable. While the damage is already extensive and recovery will already be a months-long ordeal, it can get so, so much worse and this is fundamentally a crisis of lost time. People will push back and say it isn't up to Trump anymore. But while there are two other major parties in this war, Trump remains the 1) most important, and 2) most movable by external pressures (like, say, oil prices), so it's gotta be him.
English
227
70
1K
214K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@NickTimiraos @stevehou If you look at any period of history other than 2010-19, interest rates now are finally in a normal place, and given core PCE is 3% and moving higher, by any historical benchmark or actual rule of policy, interest rates should be moving higher too What was abnormal was 2020-21
Rev Cap tweet media
English
1
1
5
546
Nick Timiraos
Nick Timiraos@NickTimiraos·
I used the air quotes for a reason! You could call it an interval or whatever but the point is that it seems more likely the interval of “insurance” or “recalibration” cuts is at much greater risk of conclusion. There have been several intervals of pandemic policy: the extraordinary support which includes the delay/error, the rapid hikes to get back on sides, and finally, the recalibration to avoid unnecessary collateral damage. The longer that energy prices rise or the higher prices persist, the greater the likelihood that the next interval is something different.
English
6
2
25
5K
Steve Hou
Steve Hou@stevehou·
Can we really call it an “era” much less “easy”? Those rate cuts felt begrudging, painful, and controversial the whole way through. [god, just look at how much they aged poor Jay Powell, who’s still being sued for a remodeling cost overrun.] The Republicans hated the first three cuts, esp that first jumbo cut drove them mad, cried hell and swore it would cause the repeat of 70s. The melodrama was insane. Ended up fine. Then Trump won the same Republicans that hated the first three cuts now cried foul again. They complained the Fed was “too late” and wasn’t cutting enough, and that it was “unfair” and “political”. Meanwhile the Dems started disliking the cuts also complaining that inflation was a rising risk. And just to prove their point, the Dems and their upper middle class voters spent money on restaurants and holidays and brought inflation back. So now, we are stuck, long term rates are barely lower, we’ve got higher prices, stubborn inflation, tariffs, a war with Iran with surging gas prices, and everybody is unhappy. Except Jensen. Jensen seems really happy. He’s living the dream, selling 75% margin GPU chips to everybody even the Chinese. He’s jetting to Taiwan to slurp Taiwanese beef noodles every other month. There’s a lesson in all this. I just haven’t figured it out yet.
Steve Hou tweet media
Nick Timiraos@NickTimiraos

Takeaways from the March Fed meeting: • The era of 'easy' cuts could be over. Last year's were a recalibration; the next ones have to be earned with better inflation data or downside risks being realized. • The dots weren't as hawkish as feared, but Powell told markets not to put much weight on them given the uncertainty. • The lack of progress on core services ex-housing is "frustrating." If the Fed can't explain why that's stuck, it's harder to have confidence the inflation problem solves itself. • The DOJ probe is backfiring: Powell says he's staying until it's over, and the appeal is freezing Warsh's confirmation. wsj.com/video/fed-leav…

English
10
3
32
15.5K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@fcastofthemonth @grobb2000 @M_C_Klein @AdamPosen Won’t Powell just move the goalposts again? His approach is to invent whatever definition of inflation isn’t up or if they are all up, just say it’s transient because of XYZ reason
English
0
0
4
204
Omair Sharif
Omair Sharif@fcastofthemonth·
@grobb2000 @M_C_Klein @AdamPosen Wait till you get a load of Feb mkt-based core PCE ex-hsng. In Jan, it climbed to 2.9% (was 2.3% in Nov), highest outside of Covid readings going back to 1995. LR avg is 1.5% & core PCE target-consistent is about 1.6%. March threatens to rise to 3.1%-3.2%, prob same as core PCE.
English
1
5
18
4.2K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
Fox News tonight basically pleading with Trump to bail from Iran Even Laura Ingraham blasting Trump for underestimating Iran and not anticipating that they could close the Strait
English
28
89
1.1K
48K
Rev Cap
Rev Cap@rev_cap·
@pekwat I don’t know how this became normalized and the media just doesn’t care Nick T asked a few hard questions today for first time in like 4 years
English
0
0
3
304
Warren Pies
Warren Pies@WarrenPies·
U.S. oil export ban likely...especially once U.S. officials realize that if we export our SPR barrels they are likely to end up in China's SPR. W/o a corresponding product/gasoline export ban, then we run it back to pre-2015 days when domestic crack spreads blew out.
English
59
80
693
153.1K