rfmwguy

@AbirStellar Pssssttt...tax scam

Right, because the hundreds of thousands of people who have worked at NASA, plus the entire aerospace industry, are all coordinating a decades-long conspiracy. Totally makes sense.

@alexboge Uhhhh....yeeeaaaahhhh

“Why didn’t Artemis II photograph the Apollo landing sites?” Because there was no reason to. We already have the images - high-resolution, crystal-clear proof sitting right there for anyone who isn’t terminally online and allergic to facts. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has photographed all six Apollo landing sites in exquisite detail. They’ve also been independently imaged by Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter (India), Kaguya (SELENE) (Japan), and Chang’e 2 (China). Those missions were in proper low lunar orbit, about 50 km above the surface, packed with dedicated narrow-angle cameras built exactly for surface mapping. Artemis II? High-speed flyby at 8,000–10,000 km out, one quick pass, zero orbital insertion, and zero surface-mapping gear on board. Just crew snapping pictures through windows with off-the-shelf cameras. Trying to resolve car-sized hardware from that distance would be like reading license plates from the International Space Station - utterly pointless. More importantly, there was zero mission value in pandering to the denial crowd. NASA designs flights around engineering, science, and crew safety, not around humoring conspiracy theorists who treat evidence like it’s optional. The data already exists. It’s been confirmed, cross-checked, and independently verified by multiple nations for years. And let’s be honest: even if Artemis II had beamed back 8K footage of the lunar modules with little American flags still standing, the same deniers would instantly scream “FAKE!” while furiously refreshing their flat-Earth forums. No one cares what deniers want - they exist for our amusement only. Zombies in clown makeup.

@RARohde Green screen glitches...ignored as usual.

What a world we live in. Astronauts are literally flying around the moon, and some idiots on the internet will farm engagement but arguing that it is all fake.

@james80313998 @IanCopeland5 I am not a research bot

@rfmwguy @IanCopeland5 Find the nasa livestream segment where that clips from… I can make anything with a green hue a green screen in a free video software dude.

Is the Earth flat? No Is the Moon real? Yes Is Artemis in Outerspace? Yes You're welcome...

@jameypricephoto Decades of observation and reflection. You'll get there...perhaps.

@rfmwguy Were you born stupid? Or did you become stupid over time?

I have seen so much AI junk floating around the Internet. Stop sharing it. THIS however, is not AI, or fake, and is spectacular. And yes. Still a sphere, you flat Earth morons.

@James_Hawke1 But tax scams aren't

Nobody cares about NASA and their phony trip around the Moon. The Internet has not reacted. Space is dead.

@AlexSvanArt Green screen glitching...lol

You’d think a fake Moon landing and Globe-Earth would’ve been exposed by aeronautical engineers and physicists (at least from rival or even enemy countries). Instead, the loudest “debunking” comes from random idiots on the internet with zero credentials. That alone tells you it’s not worth engaging with. Let them play in their sandbox of stupidity

@alexboge And green screens never glitch

It truly puzzles me to watch people look at these stunning, awe inspiring images from NASA’s Artemis II mission, showing Earth and the Moon exactly as physics predicts, and their first instinct is to shout into the world: “I am willfully ignorant. I reject evidence. I refuse to understand even the most basic science, and I would rather deny reality than accept it.” There is something deeply broken in that mindset. Not skepticism, not curiosity, but a deliberate refusal to engage with reality itself. These images are not just beautiful. They are a direct window into how the universe actually works. And some people would rather close their eyes than look.

@DSPetolicchio And green screens aren't perfect

The moon landing was real. Dinosaurs existed. The earth is not flat. The illuminati don't control your life. If you're offended by this post, good.

@benjamincowen Or green screen foibles

New way to find the lowest IQ people on this platform: Post a picture of the moon and wait for them to flood your comment section with dozens of conspiracies.

@FlatEarthDaveX They'll probably ask you to explain green screen glitches

Getting the sense that uap disclosure is completely connected to fake space missions. Which means we are living on a petri dish. And so are the life forms whom created it. Dimensions are relative sizes. Maybe its 11 maybe its infinite. <end brain freeze>

@_TruthZone_ Money shot

The entire Artemis crew is visible on video when a jar of Nutella flies in from behind the camera with a perfect rotation to show the label. This is very bizarre...

Notice nasa fan boys have gotten reeeeaaallly quiet lately. Even they know a green screen when they see it. Imagine the grief the special effects contractors are feeling about now.

@elonmusk Elon, they're faking the vids. Step up and call them out...for us. Please.

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Hi IQ nasa publicity dept

@andtartary2 No legit tech reason for anything flying around during launch. Blast would damage all nearby.

Tell me what you think might be inside those four capsules as they head off just after take-off. Imagine the worst and you’ll be spot on.

Earth 1 courtesy Peter Gabriel's music vid Steam. Pic 2 nasal. Aint special effects great?