Rolf S

6.3K posts

Rolf S banner
Rolf S

Rolf S

@roefe_s

Katılım Ağustos 2015
17 Takip Edilen98 Takipçiler
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@McFaul So you are admitting here that you are an opportunist without any principles.
English
0
0
0
4
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
I opposed Trump's war against Iran. There was no imminent threat to the US. All other means of achieving US objectives were not exhausted. He did not consult with Congress. But if Trump's war produces democracy in Iran, permanent nuclear and missile disarmament & the end of support for terrorists forever, I will praise him.
English
513
83
912
74.2K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@DougAMacgregor Can anyone explain to me what the purpose would be of taking Kharg Island. I'm pretty sure Iran would not hesitate to destroy their own oil shipping terminals if necessary.
English
0
0
0
17
Douglas Macgregor
Douglas Macgregor@DougAMacgregor·
Trump's former envoy to Ukraine, Kellogg, is going nuts. He claims American soldiers are willing to risk their lives to capture Kharg Island. 'We don't necessarily have to send troops into Iran, but we need to capture Kharg Island. We need to do it the way the Romans did. We need to put legions on the ground to secure the territory. I understand it's risky. There's always risk. But these guys, these young men and women, they understand the risk they're taking to capture Kharg and open the Strait of Hormuz. Marine combat teams can open the lower part of the strait. And then I'd call on the 82nd Airborne Division or the Rangers to take Kharg Island. That way, I could essentially control the flow of oil out of Iran.' For Epstein! @Slavyangrad
English
595
1.5K
7.9K
308.3K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@witte_sergei The result of watching too many Hollywood movies.
English
0
0
0
9
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@secretsqrl123 I don't think you could hold it. And honestly I don't see a reason why the U.S should take it. Why?
English
0
0
0
48
david D.
david D.@secretsqrl123·
can we take kharg island. YES can we hold it YES will it cost us dearly, yes
English
294
73
1.1K
46.9K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@WeTheBrandon It will be really interesting what these marines mission will be. Either we will see a suicide mission or one of Trumps legendary 4D chess moves. 🤣
English
0
0
0
10
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@maxotte_says So einfach lässt sich das nicht mehr unter dem Deckel halten in Zeiten von Social Media
Deutsch
0
0
0
9
Max Otte
Max Otte@maxotte_says·
Health Ranger: "Trumps Fake-Verhandlungen sind nur ein Hinhaltetaktik, um eine Invasion des Iran mit US-Marines am Wochenende vorzubereiten. Ich glaube, sie werden östlich der Straße von Hormus landen, da die Durchfahrt Selbstmord wäre. Ich tippe auf eine Landung in der Nähe von Chabahar. Das wird natürlich erst nach Börsenschluss geschehen. Sollte Trump das durchziehen, werden Tausende US-Marines getötet werden, und die amerikanische Bevölkerung wird nichts davon erfahren."
HealthRanger@HealthRanger

PREDICTION: Trump's fake negotiations are just a delaying tactic to set up a weekend invasion of Iran with U.S. Marines. They will land, I believe, EAST of the Strait of Hormuz, because sailing through the Strait would be suicide. My bet is on landing near Chabahar. This will only happen AFTER markets close, of course. If Trump proceeds with this, there will be thousands of U.S. Marines killed, and the American people won't be told about any of them.

Deutsch
74
111
424
25K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@JohnCleese Don't think these kind of statements will improve the willingness for negotations on the Iranian side .
English
0
0
0
3
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@defense_civil25 Bad Idea. You would need 100 of thousands to have even a slight chance of success
English
0
0
0
4
US Homeland Security News
US Homeland Security News@defense_civil25·
🚨Update: United States planning to ‘occupy’ parts of Iran, permanently, in order to control the Strait of Hormuz forever! US is deploying tens of thousands of troops and Marines in preparation for ground operations! This War is Far from Over!
US Homeland Security News tweet media
English
2.6K
2.3K
7.6K
757.8K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@Adi13 The reality is: The majority of the Iranians are behind this "regime". Sure, there is opposition but most people don't want to be "freed" by the U.S. It is propaganda
English
0
0
0
6
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@EricLDaugh you mean. Trump embarrassed the U.S. again. Biggest liar ever
English
0
0
0
3
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 LMFAO! President Trump just EMBARRASSED Iran on the world stage "They shot 101 missiles at the USS Abraham Lincoln — and out of 101 missiles shot, EVERY SINGLE ONE of them was knocked down. Think of what that means!" 🔥
English
2.4K
5.2K
30.1K
937.5K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@MyLordBebo LOL. They agreed to that already before this US invasion.
English
0
0
0
21
Lord Bebo
Lord Bebo@MyLordBebo·
🇮🇷🇺🇸 Trump says Iran agreed to not have nukes: "I don't want to say in advance, but they've agreed they will never have a nuclear weapon. They've agreed to that." That was always the case? That’s why they were close to a nuke since 1979 … but never had one.
English
62
178
1.7K
230.9K
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Trump on Iran: We really had regime change. This is a change in the regime because the leaders are all different. I think we can say this is regime change.
English
672
558
2.4K
1.1M
Sulaiman Ahmed
Sulaiman Ahmed@ShaykhSulaiman·
BREAKING: U.S PROPOSE 15 POINT PLAN TO IRAN TO END THE WAR 1. Removal of all sanctions on Iran. 2. US assistance in advancing and developing a civilian nuclear project (electricity generation). 3. Removal of the threat of sanctions being reimposed. 4. Iran’s nuclear programme is frozen under a defined framework. 5. Enriched uranium to remain, but under supervision and agreed limits. 6. Missile programme to be addressed at a later stage, with limits on quantity and range. 7. Use of nuclear programmes restricted to civilian/defensive purposes only. 8. Development of existing nuclear capabilities halted. 9. No further expansion of enrichment capabilities. 10. No production of weapons-grade nuclear material on Iranian soil. 11. All enriched material to be handed over to the IAEA within an agreed timeline. 12. Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow to be taken out of use (destroyed). 13. International monitoring and verification mechanisms enforced. 14. Gradual implementation tied to compliance. 15.Additional regional and security understandings between the parties.
Sulaiman Ahmed tweet media
English
2.4K
1.3K
4.7K
1.3M
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@retail_mourinho Maybe. But I really don't see what these few thousand marines should achieve. It doesn't make any sense.
English
0
0
0
9
Retail Mourinho
Retail Mourinho@retail_mourinho·
So Trump is stalling Iran until Friday, until the troops are in place, and then after market close he’ll say Iran messed up the negotiations to justify a ground invasion. We all agree that’s what’s going to happen?
English
1.3K
6K
37.2K
1.1M
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@LibertyHannes Hmm.. Weil sich PV und Wind nur dort "rechnet", wo dieses Anlagen massiv aus Steuergeldern subventioniert werden?
Deutsch
0
0
1
5
Liberty Hannes
Liberty Hannes@LibertyHannes·
Warum nutzt Kuba nicht einfach Photovoltaik und Windenergie? Die sind immer noch abhängig von den fossilen Energieträgern. Für diese Politik auf dem Rücken unseres Klimas erhalten sie jetzt die Quittung.
Deutsch
211
76
984
28.4K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@ungemeve Es gibt aber keine auch nur halbwegs verlässliche Zahlen.
Deutsch
0
0
0
139
U.M. OSINT
U.M. OSINT@ungemeve·
Nach allen halbwegs verlässlichen Zahlen haben die USA und Israel im Krieg gegen das iranische Regime nach drei Wochen weit weniger Zivilisten getötet, als das Regime bei den Aufständen. Einfach mal wirken lassen.
Deutsch
130
190
1.3K
25.9K
Rolf S
Rolf S@roefe_s·
@DigitalerC Ich glaube wir sind mindestens schon bei der 10. Dimension angekommen.
Deutsch
0
0
0
12
Digitaler Chronist ✏️
Wenn man die Züge, die Trump macht, verstehen würde, dann wäre es kein 5D-Schach oder so ähnlich.
Deutsch
35
3
76
3.1K