rubic3n

🚨 In light of ScienceGuardians' recent report presenting evidence of fraud, identity manipulation, and coordinated misconduct within the PubPeer Network Mob (read the full post here: x.com/SciGuardians/s…), Perpetrator 1, the financial advisor, is prosecutable under U.S. law for repeatedly attacking high-profile scientists with derogatory terms (we have documented numerous pieces of undeniable evidence), particularly given their thousands of PubPeer comments under false identities and alleged confession to fraudulent actions. Civil defamation is highly likely if scientists sue, as the attacks likely cause harm to reputations and lack credible basis due to the advisor’s non-scientific background. Criminal prosecution for wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001), or cyberstalking (18 U.S.C. § 2261A) is moderately likely, supported by the targeted attacks and deceptive pseudonyms, but requires specific evidence of false claims, tangible harm (e.g., professional losses), or intent to harass. Prosecution hinges on PubPeer comment logs, victim testimonies, and financial records to prove harm or benefit. The attacks suggest intent to harm and further investigation could strengthen a case, especially for defamation or fraud. 🎙️ Perpetrator 1 explicitly confesses to multiple fraudulent actions and violations: 1. They know Hoya camphorifolia — a fraudulent anonymous account on PubPeer. 2. They admit that Hoya camphorifolia — responsible for approximately 25,000 comments — uses multiple false identities. 3. They admit that they themselves operate under multiple identities. 4. They admit that they have worked together with Hoya camphorifolia. 🛑Update: Legality of the New Confession: Perpetrator 1’s previous tweet admitting a role in the retraction of @SabinehazanMD’s hypothesis paper (read the full post here: x.com/SciGuardians/s…) and in the snapshot shared here — capturing their recent tweet claiming to “personally lobby” a journal, despite no scientific credentials, may violate U.S. law. If achieved through deception, it could support wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) or defamation, harming scientists’ reputations. 5. They admit in separate tweets to causing one paper’s retraction and claiming ability to lobby for another’s republication.

RWANDA Over 1,000,000 people were killed in the 1994 Genocide Against Tutsi. Half a million were raped. #Kwibuka30 #FactsOnRwanda

Uplink... Downlink... Could the physicians join us at the ADULT table? BIO-CYBER INTERFACE onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100…