BnbMaxii🫡

8.6K posts

BnbMaxii🫡

BnbMaxii🫡

@runitbackx9

Massachusetts, USA Katılım Mayıs 2023
284 Takip Edilen2.3K Takipçiler
BnbMaxii🫡 retweetledi
OverDose
OverDose@Overdose_AI·
This dude is right - memecoins don't exist right now. What we have is VIRALITY coins and nobody wants to admit it. A memecoin had COMMUNITY behind it who BELIEVED in the sh!t, cults of pure degens diamond handing through -80% drawdowns screaming at each other in TG groups at 4am to not sell, Making memes, gifs and stickers - harassing every influencer on the planet to notice them etc. etc. $PEPE, $SHIB and even new stuff like $WIF, $MOG and $BRETT These communities were PSYCHOTIC and that's precisely WHY they worked. Now? Some teenager screenshots a trending tweet, deploys a coin, bundles 20 wallets and extracts in the first 20 minutes. No TG community, no X community, no art, no gifs or memes -> no reason to hold ANYTHING because the "meme" lasts about 10 minutes and the only traders are bots or people that use terminals and look only on RAW DATA and PA. If you ask for my opinion -> when the last extractor gets extracted on, and we are VERY close to that point, The market goes back to coins that normies actually give a fk about. Real memecoins WILL COME BACK. And when they do -> the real holders like us will feast. WE WILL get the REAL 100x's, I'm sure of it.
Ape Capital @ApeCapitalFTW

viralitycoins replaced memecoins Memecoins are dead. People don't realize this. People are only bidding "muh narrative" and bet on virality. Virality fades fast as it's often short lived. Back in the days we has teams grinding and using tax fees to roll out sick marketing for projects.

English
150
49
330
39.7K
Fundz🥷💯
Fundz🥷💯@getthefundz·
@sillytuna The community on the solana token made for you will definitely help raise the alarm and make the exchanges aware💯
English
3
0
9
2.3K
BnbMaxii🫡 retweetledi
Palgrani
Palgrani@Palgrani2·
weve seen many goated memes fail detective 67 its not really about the meme its about the holders that send coins higher… the more crowded a coin the harder the takeoff
English
24
3
53
5.3K
BnbMaxii🫡
BnbMaxii🫡@runitbackx9·
all kols are sidelined on machi just like they was on pigeon and whitewhale this goes wayy higher 8
English
5
1
37
1.4K
BnbMaxii🫡
BnbMaxii🫡@runitbackx9·
cz has 4 machi has 8
Polski
0
0
14
450
BnbMaxii🫡
BnbMaxii🫡@runitbackx9·
@level941 thoughts on big bro machi flipping pigeon nd whitewhale?
English
0
0
0
66
941
941@level941·
I joke about 40+ year olds in this space all the time and just got it thrown back at me. This is good work PIGEON APPROVED 🫳🏻
LJC@OnlyLJC

@WhiteWhaleLabs @level941 Two 40 year old multimillionaires one of them being an Ai generated pigeon and the other one a white whale are beefing about their memecoin on the Solana blockchain. What a time to be alive.

English
12
12
143
12.4K
BnbMaxii🫡 retweetledi
LJC
LJC@OnlyLJC·
@WhiteWhaleLabs @level941 Two 40 year old multimillionaires one of them being an Ai generated pigeon and the other one a white whale are beefing about their memecoin on the Solana blockchain. What a time to be alive.
English
22
11
169
15.7K
The White Whale
The White Whale@WhiteWhaleLabs·
No Thank You, I Don't Smoke First, I want to thank @level941 for his detailed and thoughtful responses to the questions I put forth. I know it's not easy to be put to the hard questions and respect the time he took into crafting his reply. It's important that we bring this conversation back to reality, however. The reality is that - despite some code being written - this is an idea. Nothing more, nothing less. And new ideas in this space is what we all need more of. That said, @WhiteWhaleLabs would respectfully decline integrating this idea into our infrastracture for two primary reasons: 1. This idea only really works with Meteora's full support. Without it, direct bypasses of the burn router to the underlying pool can and will be made. Not to mention that at scale liquidity exists in a multitude of places (Raydium/Orca/FusionAMM/etc) and in the real world it would be impossible to not only predict within 30 days of launch where the majority of liquidity will ultimately end up but the very nature of permissionless finance says that liquidity can and will arrive at a variety of pool on a variety of protocols. The chances of Meteora giving their full support is highly unlikely. There is zero precedent for this. Meteora prioritizes open liquidity to attract volume and integrations - adding restrictions could reduce composability and drive away bots/aggregators. 2. @level941 claims the final outcome is not visible to aggregators, applied after the market clears, so it doesn't affect best-execution calcs. If the router is properly integrated, Jupiter wouldn't be "fooled". Jupiter (and other aggregators) simulate the entire atomic transaction path on-chain before quoting, including custom routers. If the burn router is registered as a valid route (as they have said they intend), Jupiter's algorithm would execute a test swap through the full sequence. This is how Jupiter handles other composable routes. This would then in fact directly impact the quoted execution and be seen up front. Which would drastically shift volume away from this router because the burn fee is an additional expense of execution above and beyond pool fees. If we flip to the other point of view and believe that this implementation somehow does fool Jupiter, how many complaints would it take from execution consistently being 1-2% less than quoted it is likely to generate complaints. Jupiter has delisted problematic routes in the past for reliability, and they do monitor user feedback. Aggregators like Jupiter prioritize user trust to maintain dominance. However I maintain that the fee is not truly invisible is the integration is done correctly, which will then result in the aggregators doing what they do best - finding the path of best execution - and a total transaction cost between pool fee and burn router of 2-3% loss of transaction would not be a path selected very often. From a high level point of view, and as a supporter of free and transparent markets, I would also personally find this methodology to be in conflict with my personal values. Having a hidden "tax" to punish sellers (hidden is debated, the dev believes it would be - I believe it would not be) sounds nice to bag holders and coin managers but it goes against the ethos of free and transparent access that was the ultimate crypto promise. Markets only exist with buyers and sellers. If the goal is deflationary measures, there are a multitude of ways to accomplish this without building a "hidden tax" on sellers and then relying on a third party to force adoption. For the most part, the majority of crypto users do not realize how fragmented liquidity really is. They simply swap on Jupiter/Titan, get their order filled, and move on with their life. Behind the scenes you have sometimes dozens of competing sources of liquidity between the various protocols that facilitate liquidity provision. It's not just Orca/Raydium/FusionAMM/Meteora and the like, it's the number of pools that exist on each for the token in question. You have pairs with SOL, pairs with stables, and even pairs with other volatile assets. New pairs can be created on a limitless basis in this grand, beatiful world of permissionless finance. While it's true that TVL does tend to gravitate to some of the more dominant pools this does resolve the fact that extreme fragmentation exists and that the only meaningful impact this proposal would have overlooks that fact. While this proposal makes incredible marketing for those who are not technically savvy (kinda like how XRP is going to replace SWIFT - makes for a great narrative but just doesn't jive with reality), it does not mean that I think @level941 is necessarily a bad actor. Everyone is a good actor until they aren't, right? The very fact that he's thinking outside the box to things that are new and innovative should be commended, even if they don't work out in the real world. As always, I wish him and his project nothing but the best - even if there is no viable path to collaborate on this particular invention. 🩶🐋
941@level941

x.com/i/article/2028…

English
55
33
366
74K
Kris 🚀
Kris 🚀@Krissochris·
@anoncoinit Man this isn't the best way to go for a big brand. "This and that belongs on doge" doesn't make your platform serious. You already have a good tek. Focus on bringing volume to your platform by caballing one ticker, then trenchers will troop in!
English
1
0
3
357
BnbMaxii🫡
BnbMaxii🫡@runitbackx9·
I like the $MACHI narrative but the distribution on it is terrible lol @machibigbrother isn’t no retard to shill something you bundled 70% of sold for now. machi will probably support this when the scammers are out
English
0
0
1
388
BnbMaxii🫡
BnbMaxii🫡@runitbackx9·
@machibigbrother will definitely support this but some of you guys need to sell the distribution on this is horrible and is probably making him hesitate
English
0
0
0
124
BnbMaxii🫡
BnbMaxii🫡@runitbackx9·
@HopiumPapi thoughts on $MACHI? machi more richer and known than pigeon and whitewhale combined
English
0
0
0
36
Erik Stevens 🐆
Erik Stevens 🐆@HopiumPapi·
Some people think this is the beginning of World War III and the end times. I see it differently, I believe this is the start of greater stability and prosperity in a region that has endured turmoil for far too long, along with stronger global cooperation across the world.
English
60
32
142
15.4K