Rusttyyy
846 posts

Rusttyyy
@rusttyyystudio
Créateur de contenus || +8000 abonnés YouTube
Katılım Mart 2023
242 Takip Edilen199 Takipçiler
Rusttyyy retweetledi

Le tweet principal de Mario Joos alerte sur un changement d'algorithme YouTube en septembre 2025 : les vues sur les Shorts anciens (plus d'un mois) ont chuté drastiquement, priorisant le contenu récent. Cela impacte les créateurs, favorise la quantité au détriment de la qualité, et risque de nuire à l'économie des créateurs. Il appelle YouTube à rectifier pour équilibrer. (Données basées sur analyses de chaînes majeures.)
Français

🚨Important reminder: The YouTube algorithm actually changed, for the worse. (+Data)
I’ve addressed this last year already and because we haven’t seen it being addressed, I thought it’d be a good idea to remind everyone of what happened last year.
Before I begin, a direct note to all my friends at YouTube, I truly respect what you’ve been doing in the past year, and I know you’ll take this problem seriously, but urgency is key when creators are hurting.
Let’s begin.
Last year, creators of all sizes started noticing a significant change in the overall performance of their channels. Usually this is related to the overall behavior of audiences, however, this one felt different. It wasn’t just one or two channels, it was every single channel I was working on (and more). These are channels that pull 100 million to 1 billion views per month at times.
At first, I was like: alright, let’s find out where we’re going wrong. Maybe we’re missing something. However, after weeks and months, no answers were found. This is very frustrating, not only for myself but also for the creators who are relying on these answers to maintain their channel, business and livelihood.
But that’s when we made a breakthrough, a way of looking at data that we had missed.
You see, this entire time we were analyzing the channel as a whole, new and old videos combined. However, we weren’t focused on isolating older content, specifically content with a publish date older than one month.
That’s where, for the first time, we noticed something unusual. We saw a complete crash in short form views on content older than one month. (see image)
What we found was that somewhere in the middle of September last year, YouTube had pushed a significant change in their short form algorithm which impacted nearly every short form creator across the platform. Why is this a problem? Because it affects every creator we all care about. It didn’t matter if you were a smaller creator or one of the top ten creators, we haven’t found many people who were spared. I’ll leave a brief explanation at the bottom so you can check your own channel.
And these weren’t just entertainment or educational creators, it was both.
What we found is that YouTube seems to have implemented a change that strongly prioritizes content uploaded in the last month, roughly 28 to 30 days, we’re still unsure.
But what impact does this have, and why do I believe this is something that should be brought to light?
The first impact is that we’re seeing a shift away from quality to quantity. Often, creators live off the revenue generated, not just Adsense, from these bigger content pieces. A strong portion of this revenue comes from their back catalog, meaning older content. With this change, you’re increasing the importance of high volume uploads in the first 30 days.
What do I believe is happening, and why is this change going through?
I believe there are two reasons why YouTube is pushing this change.
First, to hit certain targets with Shorts. Plain simple, I don’t believe this is a “what’s best for the creator” type of play, it feels more like a “we want to compete with TikTok” type of play. Not unreasonable, even if the creator gets hurt by it short term. I’m just trying to think from a corporate point of view.
The second reason, which I believe to be the actual leading reason, is a push for recency, freshness or novelty, whichever term they would choose to use. But if this is the reason, there’s a massive overcorrection happening. Some content needs that freshness: news, streaming highlights, medical information. However, this isn’t true for all types of content. Some content from years ago is just as good today.
We have noticed that certain top content pieces, individual videos, still get a significant amount of views, so it looks more like prioritization than anything else.
Regardless, while in private I find it fun to refer to this situation as “the flattening”, in reality this is a very concerning moment where simple ideas turn into a massive hit toward the creator economy. And this is just the tip of the iceberg of changes that have been affecting people.
It’s important that changes on the platform aren’t just focused on the consumer, but the preservation of a healthy creator economy that allows creators to grow their business, teams, and create better content. Without a focus on both the creator and the consumer, you’ll quickly run into an issue of low quality slop that makes people want to go elsewhere.
If there’s any call to action here for you, whether you’re a creator or a viewer, I strongly encourage you to leave your thoughts here to encourage YouTube to rethink this decision, or at least optimize it so that it’s also regarding the importance of keeping a healthy creator economy. Share your thoughts, and even data from your own channel, because this will be seen by people who have the power to make change.
Disclaimer: I’ve left out some sensitive information. However, if you want to check this for yourself, go to Analytics, click on Advanced Mode, filter by Content Type (Shorts), filter by Publish Date (for example any short published from Jan 2025 to Jun 2025), set the data to Last 365 Days and take a look at the change happening around September last year. I think you can imagine why it took so long for us to find out where the issue began.

English
Rusttyyy retweetledi

I'm giving 3 of you who like, comment & repost this tweet an annual Premium plan.
comment here when done.
Pikzels@Pikzels
Pikzels 3.2 is Now Available! 🪄 TRY FOR FREE 👉 go.pikzels.com/x
English

@Benramine_ Naturellement vers une personne de couleur noir 🤷♂️
Français

@Benramine_ J’ai une supposition honnête: je pense que les gens vont plus facilement vers les personnes auxquelles ils peuvent s’identifier. C’est à dire qu’une personne de couleur blanche ira naturellement vers une personne de couleur blanche. Tandis qu’une personne de couleur noir ira
Français


@StephLau1200 @va20531 Dans ce cas n’achetez pas Volkswagen non plus qui utilisaient la main d’œuvre gratuite que l’Allemagne nazi leur envoyaient par déportation… 🤷♂️ Ni Hugo Boss aussi… et tant d’autres…
Français

@va20531 Le fait de ne pas vouloir acheter une bagnole à un gars au bras tendu qui supporte l'extrême droite en Allemagne est-ce une exigence morale ou du bon sens? Vous avez deux heures 😏
Français

Ce bashing primaire devient stupide et ridicule.
Ils vont acheter quoi comme voiture électrique européenne dont le dirigeant répond à leurs exigences morales ?!
franceinfo@franceinfo
"C'était la voiture à avoir, et là, clairement c'est fini" : ces entreprises françaises qui ne veulent plus de Tesla dans leur flotte l.francetvinfo.fr/UNr
Français
Rusttyyy retweetledi


@Ilangabet Si vous parlez du nazisme, c’était un parti socialiste et non d’extrême droite 🤷♂️
Français
Rusttyyy retweetledi

Deepseek running locally and privately for autocompletion in VSCode! 🙌
In less than a minute, I'll show you how to download Deepseek-coder and set it as the autocompletion model in VSCode.
You’ll need to use @ollama to download the model and CodeGPT to select it as the autocompletion model.
Enjoy the best models running locally with codegpt.co :)
English










