
Ryan Connor | RockawayX 🇺🇸
4K posts

Ryan Connor | RockawayX 🇺🇸
@ryanconnor
Partner at @RockawayX. prev @blockworks, macro investor. The most profitable arb is time horizon. Progress is boundless🇺🇸 tg: @ryanrconnor.


Chamath @chamath says a million AI tokens costs $0.50 from China versus $56 from Anthropic, and that spread has to rationalize. "Let's say a "barrel of intelligence," which is a million tokens, okay? You can buy that barrel for $26 from Anthropic's really good model. You can buy it from OpenAI for $26. Anthropic's latest model costs you $56. Elon is selling you a barrel of intelligence for $1. Zuck is about to sell it to you for $1.50. Demis and Sundar are trying to sell it to you for $1. The Chinese will sell it to you for $0.50. So this rationalization has to happen. We have the same input that has this crazy cost." ____ Follow @firesidealpha for more daily highlights of key business and technology conversations.


‘Member of Technical Staff’ at Anthropic is now easily the most under-stated and prestigious engineering title in technology. It’s the corporate equivalent of introducing Michael Jordan as ‘works in athletics.’

Crypto markets are rewarding fundamentals Check out the divergence, for example, between Financials Crypto Sector (eg $HYPE) and Consumer & Culture Crypto Sector (mostly memecoins) Quick blog post: grayscale.com/the-stack/cryp…




Encore un scandale. On accuse Elon Musk sans arrêt de se servir de Grok pour faire passer ses idées. Pourtant, le @neutralityorg vient de sortir The Neutrality Project : une étude indépendante qui prouve l’inverse. Sur 18 modèles IA testés, 54 positions sur 60 atterrissent à gauche du centre. Moyenne globale : -0.41 (biais progressiste massif, surtout environnement et valeurs sociales). Et Grok 4.5 ? -0.02. Le modèle le plus neutre de tout le benchmark. Le seul vraiment proche du centre. Pendant ce temps, les autres boîtes injectent massivement leur idéologie de gauche dans des IA qui répondent à des milliards de questions par jour. Manipulation des masses à grande échelle. C’est absolument scandaleux. Ça devrait être un scandale mondial. x.com/neutralityorg/…

Heading to TomorrowX Summit 2026 in Austin, Nov 17-18. Two days with the CEOs, investors, and operators moving TMT. @TomorrowXSummit #tomorrowXsummit2026



As a VC, Fable is better than me at VC work. It breaks down white papers better than I do. It's better at financial analysis. It chews through mountains of diligence in minutes. There is no single well-scoped intellectual task where I beat a frontier AI. I catch its mistakes sometimes, but it catches mine more often. If my job is "VC work," then Fable is better than me at my job. But Fable alone would be a mediocre investor. It would quickly pass on all the bunk, sure. But among the set of doable deals, it can't find the one with the je ne sais quoi. It doesn't have the bias toward special people, wild ideas, or risk-taking. Its tweets and thinkpieces are OK, but they're too safe, too obvious. I can prompt it in the right direction, but even then it's not quite right. It's too suggestible. It changes its mind too easily. It's not stubborn, self-assured, irrationally confident about how the future will play out, the way great investors are. But me + Fable is really good. Better than either of us alone. In fact every investor on our team has leveled up with AI in the same way. We all feel we have more to do now, not less. We feel more capable, not less. My theory is that AI disempowers service providers and empowers owners. If you sell your labor by the task, AI is genuinely terrifying. It can accomplish that task cheaper, faster, with more control and less bullshit. But if you own the outcome, if you're using AI to do something for you, then AI is amazing. It's empowering, not disempowering. Make your own logo, design your own website, write your own copy, build your own systems. It also means is that you should aim to reorganize yourself in the food chain. If you don't, AI will do it for you. Don't be a service provider, be an owner. If you're building something, you are a beneficiary of AI, all of the incredible gains that AI is enabling will accrue to you too. But if you're a tax on people building things, just know that the tax rate on building is rapidly going to 0.








