shresth

1.8K posts

shresth banner
shresth

shresth

@sagrawal

ceo @poddotnetwork

Katılım Temmuz 2018
1.2K Takip Edilen3.6K Takipçiler
shresth
shresth@sagrawal·
getting pumped for the MEGA launch. 60kg overhead press.
English
5
1
30
1.5K
Lyron
Lyron@lyronctk·
The total economic value of lost productivity every year due to plane wifi is probably close to the GDP of Vermont
English
44
49
210
3.1K
shresth retweetledi
Common Prefix
Common Prefix@CommonPrefix·
Episode 9 of Honest Majority is live 🎙️ "Is FasterPay faster than FastPay?" @dionyziz sits down with @giorgos_tsimos , scientist at @poddotnetwork, to discuss the latest research directions at Pod and the protocol's design. 1/4
English
3
11
20
3.1K
shresth retweetledi
Giorgos Tsimos
Giorgos Tsimos@giorgos_tsimos·
Fixing a stuck bank account is annoying. Recovering liveness for an account with a stuck payment on chain — without breaking safety guarantees — is an active research problem. Glad to discuss with @dionyziz at @CommonPrefix about improving throughput and client recovery on Pod!
Common Prefix@CommonPrefix

Episode 9 of Honest Majority is live 🎙️ "Is FasterPay faster than FastPay?" @dionyziz sits down with @giorgos_tsimos , scientist at @poddotnetwork, to discuss the latest research directions at Pod and the protocol's design. 1/4

English
0
1
6
313
shresth retweetledi
Niko
Niko@0xniko0x·
frankly, every one of these is a patch for a problem that shouldn't exist: 1) priority fees don't fix toxic flow - they monetize it. 2) speedbumps admit that continuous (fifo) matching is broken 3) market data jitter only matters when microseconds decide who wins those aren't solutions - they're symptoms of a structure that's fundamentally broken frequent batch auctions.
Robert Sags@RobertSagurton

Talked to bunch of Hyperliquid insiders about toxic flow and this is what I got: (1) Priority fees good for toxic flow for now and accepted as a solid idea for monetization. - Good for @TheHUB if traders are paying for optimization! (2) Speedbump good for those who can’t compete with the big HFT’s who kill them on CLOB’s. - Guess this one depends on who you ask! (3) Access to market data and paying validators (who are not upgrading) is bad. - Bit of perverse incentive here to upgrade. Also heard there’s 20ms variance on market data which is too much jitter. (4) Rate limit when congestion is annoying (and buggy). - I guess rate limit is supposed to be based on market share? Data points to learn from are always appreciated.

English
3
1
15
738
shresth retweetledi
Pod Network
Pod Network@poddotnetwork·
Testnet is live for early users! Check out test.pod.network if you've been approved.
English
70
71
234
16.1K
Pod Network
Pod Network@poddotnetwork·
Early access is live: Deposited USDC + referred friends? Checkout: test.pod.network Rolling out to our earliest supporters first. More soon - stay tuned.
Pod Network tweet media
English
72
79
334
46.2K
shresth
shresth@sagrawal·
pod is purpose built for fast and fair markets: - orderflow is confirmed in <150ms without consensus - markets are settled in batches using set agreement. leader can't censor or include its own orders - single clearing price across batch, independent of ordering (no mev) 👇
Pod Network@poddotnetwork

x.com/i/article/2046…

English
39
8
62
2.6K
shresth retweetledi
shresth
shresth@sagrawal·
the secret sauce for building fast, fair and global markets!
Pod Network@poddotnetwork

Building decentralized markets requires tackling challenges related to efficiency, real-time latency, market fairness, and censorship-resistance. Running black-box consensus at each step of the way won’t cut it. @abresas and @giorgos_tsimos discuss how Pod is utilizing a dual-architecture and enforceable market rules to provide fast and fair markets on decentralized networks on a global scale. 🎙️New episode of Inside the Pod 👇

English
1
2
22
939