Sal_ICP

@thiskidkills @catt334 It's getting so weird at this point. Bro needs to get a life

@catt334 damn, tell me where icp touched you - was it your no-no place?

Internet Computer Not Internet Communism I have no interest in eating bugs and living in pods

@peterfury Watch your prediction for AJ Peter?

Commentary we know our boxing ‘ didn’t they just say the Russian would win in 4 rounds 😂

@lastmjs Jordan, In your view, what is the end goal of $ICP? What is the finished product

1/ Azle is a Wasm-based TypeScript and JavaScript runtime for the ICP decentralized cloud platform. The first prototype of Azle was open-sourced in 2021. We just passed 400 dependent repos. Thanks for trying us out everyone! Hoping to continue developing into robust maturity

Most of these were done, I'm in correct? Can we get a new list for 2024? @BobBodily

@BasedGiant_ what big players

$ICP friends, if you feel like NGMI, think about this: 1. DFINITY is marketing to developers via global hubs + hackathons, 2. Dominic's been on a conference pilgrimage as speaker for a year, 3. ckETH soon, 4. EVMs soon, 5. Big players building behind closed doors. WAGMI

@BobBodily Any ideas why @VitalikButerin literally never mentions $ICP anymore? @dominic_w

Vitalik just gave us the future roadmap for Bitcoin Vitalik just released a new blog post about different types of L2s on Ethereum, and I think it has EVERYTHING to do with Bitcoin. Let me explain. Heterogeneity of L2s (L2s are differentiating from each other) Vitalik argues that we are gradually seeing more heterogeneity in L2s on Ethereum, meaning there isn’t a single kind of L2, rather there is a broad spectrum of L2s with different trade-offs. The trade-offs here can be best explained by the blockchain trilemma (coined by Vitalik himself), which states there is trade-off between three critical aspects of blockchain technology: security, scalability and decentralization. Some L2s are: 1. Slower, more expensive, and more secure. 2. Faster, cheaper, and have more trust assumptions. 3. In the middle for speed, cost, and security. Examples In some cases, these are L1s that have decided to become L2s (Polygon as an ETH sidechain progressively moving to Polygon 2.0 as an ETH L2 rollup). In other cases they are fully centralized systems wanting to decentralize pieces of their tech stack. And in other cases they are games/social media that want decentralization but don’t necessarily require high security. In each of these cases you want to make different trade-offs on the blockchain trilemma, meaning you want different solutions (or L2s) to do different things. 3 Types of L2s (it is actually more of a gradient) There are 3 main types of layer 2s that Vitalik talks about in his post: 1. Rollups 2. Validiums 3. Disconnected systems Rollups Rollups are the zero knowledge rollups we all know and love because you can always trustlessly bring the asset back to L1. Computation is proven via fraud proofs or validity proofs, and the entirety of the data is stored on the L1. We don’t have any zk rollups like this on Bitcoin yet because Bitcoin can’t verify validity proofs. But there are plenty of projects trying to do this well on ETH. These are generally expensive as you have full data availability on the L1 and you have to generate big expensive proofs. Validiums Validiums are a step down from rollups. In a Validium you store data off-chain somewhere else, and only store the proof on the L1. This means Validiums are much cheaper than Rollups, but they add an additional trust assumption of off-chain data storage. In the case of Validiums, if the off-chain data is lost, your assets could also be lost (*not stolen). In this model, the main cost is the proving cost. You offload the data storage costs but keep the proof generation costs. Disconnected A disconnected L2 is essentially a sidechain. You have a completely separate blockchain or server, you trust some multi-sig or group of people to keep your coins safe, and then you receive all of the benefits of a sidechain (faster txn speeds, cheaper costs, etc). Layer 2s Are a Spectrum Importantly, Vitalik points out this is a gradient not discrete categories. Meaning an L2 might fall right between Validiums and Rollups, or between a Disconnected L2 and a Validium. Another important aspect of L2s is their “connectedness” to the L1. Vitalik broke this down into two parts: 1. The security of withdrawing to Ethereum 2. The security of reading Ethereum These attributes also fit on a spectrum. Finally, he discussed the security spectrum, with security demanding on the left, to scale demanding on the right. So What Does This Have To Do With Bitcoin?? This has everything to do with Bitcoin. On Bitcoin we have: Ordinals, BRC-20, Counterparty, Stamps, SRC-20, Colored coins, ARC-20, Atomicals, TAP, PIPE, BRC-100, BRC-69, BRC-21, ORC-20, ORC-CASH, Runes, Runestone, BRC-721, Lightning Network, Taproot Assets, RGB, Omni, MVC, Libre, Chia, Babylon, Interlay, Liquid, Stacks, ICP, RSK, ETH, BitVM, Bitcoin Script, TapScript, DLCs, Drivechains, Sidechains, Spacechains, Spiderchains, Statechains, Softchains, Ark, Optimistic Rollups (kind of), Sovereign rollups (in development), ZK-Rollups (someday), and many many more. Bitcoin has a huge variety of interesting layers that can all be categorized using Vitalik’s simple L2 framework, including the spectrum from Rollup L2 to Validium L2 to Disconnected L2, how securely you can withdraw from the L1 and how securely you can read from the L1, and whether you are more security-demanding vs scale-demanding. All of these Bitcoin layers have trade-offs (well explained by the Blockchain trilemma), and explain why we are likely to see MANY layers continuing to be built on Bitcoin. Conclusion Vitalik just gave us the future roadmap for Bitcoin, and the future roadmap is a wild world of interesting Layer 2 solutions, all making different trade-offs to support different use cases, collectively increasing the decentralization of the Bitcoin Layer 2 ecosystem.

@Crypto_Dep @santimentfeed @Polkadot @CardanoFeed @hedera @Aptos_Network @chainlink @iota @avax @MultiversX @radixdlt @polkadotnews No $ICP?

⚡️Top #Crypto Projects by Developer Activity in October 30 October 2023 #Cardano - 505 #Polkadot - 427 #Hedera - 380 #Aptos - 340 #Chainlink - 300 #Cosmos - 287 #IOTA - 272 #Avalanche - 250 #MultiversX - 138 #Radix - 127 Data source: @Santimentfeed $ADA #ADA $DOT #DOT $HBAR #HBAR $APT $LINK $ATOM $IOTA $AVAX #AVAX $EGLD #EGLD $XRD

@sowmaler Once the initial pain is over, and demand for ICP starts to rise, the tokenomics should begin level out Especially interesting considering how much ICP is locked up. Long term it's bullish, if you can patient of course

The dynamics of any market depend on the balance between supply and demand. For ICP, the supply side has been a major factor influencing its price, as large amounts of tokens have been released monthly to early investors. This chart shows the distribution schedule of ICP tokens. The last significant supply release will occur on May 10th 2024, when the seed investors will receive their final batch of tokens. This could create an opportunity for new entrants to invest in ICP, or it could trigger a wave of relocking by existing holders who want to extend their stake in the network.

@danawhite @VisitAbuDhabi @InAbuDhabi What a fight!!

USMAN vs CHIMAEV! #UFC294 is LIVE SATURDAY at 2pmET on ESPN+ PPV! #InAbuDhabi @VisitAbuDhabi @InAbuDhabi

@sowmaler @icx_one 🤣

Please tell me the worse projects that no one should invest in so I can go all in.

@mosesibb Why cheap? Compared to what

Imagine meeting Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc this cheap in the early 2000s 🤔 the #ICP ecosystem projects are so cheap, some with even less than a 2m market cap ☺️ #ICP is the right place to discover future gems 👌💯

@RealDanMcCoy Is this using vetkeys so the data is encrypted?

After months of stealth work I’d like to finally introduce my new app to the #ICPFamily! This app lets any user create a personal asset canister that only they own using just a wallet. It also provides a file explorer in the browser to let users upload and manage their files on chain. Features: • Code-free autonomous canister creation. • Familiar file explorer interface. • Drag and drop file upload. • Supports Plug, Stoic, and NFID. • Works on mobile with NFID. The app is currently in a whitelisted beta as I finish up testing but I’m happy to allow anyone early access. There are a lot of features still on the way including share via QR-code, named canisters, and even automatic cycles top-up. This app was meant for everyone to be able to use so I look forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts, feedback, and feature requests. The link to the deployed app is below, just login and dm me the principal at the bottom for whitelist :) h3cjw-syaaa-aaaam-qbbia-cai.ic0.app

@CoolPineapple18 ICO 2.0

At this rate the only hope for $ICP price is if some shady telegram group decide to pump it.

@0xMic0 @seers_app Why do you think lol

@purpleordinal You know something we dont?

@icircle_nft Any particular reason or?

#InternetComputer $ICP is going to $1000

@OpenFPL_DAO @funded_app I bought one more :)

We are indeed funded! Thanks to @funded_app. They have a cool feature that allows us to go to 20% over funding. The share of $FPL is still 100K per NFT, the additional 2m $FPL coming from the founding team. funded.app/projects/openf…

Huge #BetBase update coming tomorrow. 🚀 Our second game is imminent. 💥 $ICP

@SNS1dao why would be buy all these tokens and not just launch his own SNS? Dont get it

👀 neopets dev buys sns1?

@LefterisJP @discord Do you think of the $ICP SNS/DAO implementation?

Did you know that the term DAO is supposed to mean Decentralized Autonomous Organization? The D in DAO does not stand for @discord A cooperative of people working remotely for a common goal is also not a DAO. Autonomous was supposed to mean operating without human oversight!!