Ranga

21.5K posts

Ranga

Ranga

@samjignyasu

संस्कृतं नहि योऽधीते किं कृतं तेन जीवता । अम्बुधौ रत्नसम्पन्ने कम्बु लब्ध्वा स हृष्यति ॥ संस्कृतानुरागी - अध्ययनं , अध्यापनं , रचनं , जल्पनम् ।

Bangalore Katılım Mart 2014
28 Takip Edilen3.3K Takipçiler
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma Yes right. Now you have only 14 characters so brief it as apt
English
1
0
0
5
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu 2 - Ideate a rejoinder Who sleeps on शेषनाग, Who is also the one who said यम्युक्तम् - स्थावराणां हिमालय: अस्मि / इति BG10.25 ?
1
0
0
6
💕
💕@harivyoma·
1 - Understand the meaning निद्रालुरप्यवति नः स हि मे शरण्यः ॥ Even though in sleep he protects us, he is my refuge (he is in cold refuge). @samjignyasu ?
1
0
0
41
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma yes of course, शतृ is meant for that right ? Anything that gives you "one who wishes" is fine here
English
0
0
1
5
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu एष्टुं = in order to wish. How to say 'wishing that'? Sir, I am thinking शतृ। 🆗?
English
1
0
0
23
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@Neetha_Murali @Parikramah इदमेव जानासि चेत् साधु हि जानासि
हिन्दी
1
1
2
65
Neetha Muraleedharan
Neetha Muraleedharan@Neetha_Murali·
@Parikramah पथिन् शब्दः । प्रथमायां पन्थाः । तृतीयायां पथा । परन्तु समासे उत्तरपदं पथिन् चेत् अ समासान्तप्रत्ययो भवति । यथा नरपतिपथः । ऋक्पूरब्धूःपथामानक्षे । तृतीयायां नरपतिपथेन । इदमेव जानामि वर्य ।
हिन्दी
1
3
2
336
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma Yes , समास must be a name for something
English
0
0
1
7
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu मुमागम कणिका Q: "only if संज्ञा" - I failed here I think; when you say संज्ञा, is it that the समास should yield a proper name, and not just the पूर्वपदम्?
1
0
0
33
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @5suspended6th Looks like in forms, when subsequent reattempts are submitted, the editor doesn't get any notification ?
English
1
0
0
14
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu I am still confused how or what rule specifies कप् for अक्षि loses the ि-कारं। Which section in the कणिका should I refer to? 🙏
English
1
0
0
60
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @5suspended6th Yes you got it right मृगाक्ष becomes मृगाक्षी in स्त्री While मृगाक्षि meaning 'eye' remains a noun so no लिङ्गं change
1
0
1
15
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@5suspended6th @samjignyasu Let's put the requirement. I want a बहु and not the meaning of the eye. I get मृगाक्षः पुं is okay, but what about स्त्री? Please confirm - मृगाक्षि - eye मृगाक्षी - बहु
1
0
0
20
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@patangaha समासे कृते श्र्यन्नं इत्येव सिध्यति श्रीरन्नं इति तु पदद्वयं परम् असंबद्धं वर्तते
MR
0
1
0
105
पतङ्गः
पतङ्गः@patangaha·
श्री अन्न @samjignyasu महोदय! संस्कृतेन समासः श्र्यन्नं साधु उत सन्धिः श्रीरन्नं साधु।
NE
2
1
1
162
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @5suspended6th Yes समास does not mean eye so अक्षि changes to अक्ष If it meant eye then no change so अक्षि remains अक्षि Why is कप् mandated ? अक्षि doesnt feature in कप् mandate rules isnt it
1
0
1
20
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @5suspended6th Yes this is mandated So after forming मृगाक्षि , we apply the mandated change to make it मृगाक्ष And then yes, as you mentioned, we have those forms in each लिङ्गं So that's about it !
English
1
0
1
22
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu @5suspended6th Is this mandatory sir? If so, then I see मृगाक्षी f, मृगाक्षः m. & मृगाक्षं n. is this right?
English
1
0
0
19
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @5suspended6th You are right about कप् , but what about this change : x.com/samjignyasu/st…
Ranga@samjignyasu

@harivyoma This one : अक्ष्ण: अदर्शनात् (समासस्य यदि नेत्रम् इति न अर्थः) समासान्ते अच् (अकारः), बहुव्रीहौ स्त्रियां ई । कमलाक्षः (God) । मृगाक्षी (Lady) । सुन्दराक्षि (Lovely eye, no change as समास means eye) । कमलपत्राक्षम् (eye-like lotus petal)

English
1
0
1
17
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu @5suspended6th If I read it right, mandatory कप् is for स्त्री दीर्घ ई, not for नपुं. Did I misread upto this?
1
0
0
16
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @5suspended6th That's incorrect. Let's break down the understanding. अक्षि - इकारान्त नपुं , "eye". One who has deer's eyes = मृगाक्षि . After forming this, is there a mandated समासान्त rule to be applied ?
1
0
1
16
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@5suspended6th @harivyoma Yes but for : • स्त्रियां मृगनयना only, no नी (as this अङ्गं word is long , > 2 letters) • After कप् , स्त्रियां मृगनयनिका (अक → इका स्त्रियां)
2
0
2
20
Bujji🇮🇳
Bujji🇮🇳@5suspended6th·
@samjignyasu @harivyoma मृगस्य अक्षि - मृगाक्षि मृगस्य अक्षिणी इव अक्षिणी यस्य सः - मृगाक्षः (स्त्रियां मृगाक्षी) मृगस्य नयने इव नयने यस्य सः - मृगनयनः/मृगनयनकः (स्त्रियां मृगनयना/नी/का) Is my understanding right sir 🙏
हिन्दी
1
0
1
33
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu @Neetha_Murali अवर्णः सविता रात्रौ अप्रत्यक्षं अस्ति -y, adv. अप्रत्यक्षं,
NE
1
0
0
14
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
अथ प्रारभ्यते #पद्यपाठः इति काचन शृङ्खला यत्र १. प्रतिसप्ताहम् एकं पद्यं (द्वे वा) साहित्यात् चितं प्रस्तूयते २. तस्य अवगमनविधिः अर्थश्च ३. ततः लब्धानि शिक्षणानि Specific Learnings ४. भाषाकणिकाः च Generic concepts संस्कृताध्येतॄणाम् इयम् उपकाराय भवेदिति आशासे ।
MR
4
26
74
16.7K
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu @Neetha_Murali Sir, नञ् बहुव्रीहि? colorless अवर्ण . I hope I can use this as an adjective.
1
0
0
18
Ranga
Ranga@samjignyasu·
@harivyoma @Neetha_Murali yes वर्णः is noun. Now when we coin अवर्णः from that, what is this new word ? What does अनिद्रः , अपुत्रः etc mean ? Remember which कणिका ?
1
0
0
12
💕
💕@harivyoma·
@samjignyasu @Neetha_Murali I read on Apte. वर्णः [वर्ण्-अच्], thought it was m. And it is not a specific colour, so I wondered. अवर्णः सविता रात्रौ and invisbile
1
0
0
24