Sar30

@Nit0r @Rainmaker1973 They are making a generalization from the very few interactions humans and orcas have had. I’m Biology/Chemistry minor I’ve never understood why we’d make that assumption on extremely limited data. Just because they don’t in the limited interactions doesn’t mean they wouldn’t.

Orcas are intelligent, social, and learn hunting techniques from their mothers/pods. Humans aren't part of their typical prey, and they use echolocation (not just sight) to identify targets precisely. Most interactions with humans show curiosity or avoidance rather than aggression. However, there was one documented non-fatal orca attack in 1972, when a surfer almost died. ✌️

One of the biggest mysteries is how Orcas, the ocean’s most efficient predators, have never attacked humans in the wild… almost like they know something we don’t.

@Nit0r @Rainmaker1973 Humans don’t live oceans the probability and static’s are completely skewed. So many probabilities if humans evolved along orcas in the oceans over time they may have adapted to hunting us it’s seen in the wild all the time when new species are introduced in the population.

@ZHall13688667 @Rainmaker1973 @grok Humans don’t live oceans the probability and static’s are completely skewed. So many probabilities if humans evolved along orcas in the oceans over time they may have adapted to hunting us it’s seen in the wild all the time when new species are introduced in the population.

@Rainmaker1973 @grok How many orca attacks upon humans has there been .. approximately?

@likes2sleep @TheMilkBarTV He’s a plagiarizing fraud fooling newly awakened people. There are several authors who wrote everything he’s saying 30-40+ years ago. People like William Cooper, Icke, Schinider etc. published everything in the 90’s he has literally copy & paste everything they have said.

@TheMilkBarTV He's been right about everything I don't care if he calls himself Pope Jiang

EXPOSED as a total fraud... Professor Jiang (who’s not a professor): “I never called myself a professor.” VS. Jiang, over and over on his YT: “This is Professor Jiang here.”

@0xHascoin @moondaisy_s @davidicke Theres not one thing he’s said that hasn’t come straight from an Icke lecture or book. After studying all this 40 years he’s copy and pasting everyone else’s work. When he started talking about Gnosticism exactly like Icke I was like he’s straight up copying.

@moondaisy_s @davidicke “Viral” is a red herring. Would it matter if he never went viral? Would his teachings still be valuable. IMO yes. Instead of focus on this irrelevant metric as to the how, why isn’t he addressing the what?

When a China-based 'professor' who is not a professor comes out of nowhere and is suddenly everywhere promoted by all the usual suspects and with massive algorithmic support it is worth asking a lot of questions about why. x.com/EscanorReloade…

@0xHascoin @moondaisy_s @davidicke It’s silly cause people like Icke, Bill Copper, many others have already written all this 30+ years ago. He’s no guru you literally could find all this in David Ickes books and others. He literally saying nothing new. It’s almost like this guy plagiarized Ickes and others work.

@BedeBecketBacon @LizGunnNZ @davidicke Lol is this AI slop or copy and paste? Clearly you’ve never read David Icke. Sad part is gullible people will fall for the nonsense you just posted. It also seems you don’t even have a rudimentary understanding of his work. He doesn’t say or believe half the junk you posted.

David Icke Is Not a Rebel — He Is an Heir There is something partly reassuring about David Icke’s views. He stands apart from institutions, mocks official narratives, scorns orthodoxies, and invites his audience to believe they are seeing what others cannot. In an age weary of manipulation, this stance feels like courage. The central mistake made by both Icke’s admirers and his critics is the same: they assume he is channelling new insight. He is not. David Icke is not a metaphysical revolutionary. He is an heir — just the latest populariser of a very old religious pattern that has resurfaced throughout the Christian West for centuries. Once this is observed. What remains is not a cosmic whistleblower but a familiar figure: the modern Gnostic. Strip away the contemporary vocabulary — “simulation,” “frequency,” “interdimensional,” “matrix” — and Icke’s worldview would have been quite familiar in the second century. There is a false creator god who made the material world as a prison. There are lesser beings who rule this system and feed on human ignorance. There is a hidden knowledge that awakens a spiritual elite. There is no final judgment, only escape. In classical Gnosticism, the world is not fallen but fabricated. Matter is not wounded but malignant. The problem is not sin but ignorance; the solution is not repentance but insight. Salvation is not reconciliation but exit. Christianity called this vision a lie, not because it denied spiritual evil, but because it denied creation, incarnation, and judgment all at once. David Icke’s cosmology reproduces this pattern with remarkable fidelity. The names change but the metaphysics do not. Icke Has told You Where He Got It This is not conjecture. He has named them repeatedly and enthusiastically. Jewess Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, founder of Theosophy, was praised by Icke as “the greatest esoteric pioneer of the modern era.” He has called The Secret Doctrine the foundation of everything he teaches about hidden bloodlines and non-human manipulation. Alice Bailey, Blavatsky’s heir, is described by Icke as having received the blueprint now being enacted by global elites through a channeled entity known as Djwhal Khul. Icke went further still, claiming in public venues that he now channels the same force. These are not passing references. They are acknowledgments of transmission. Theosophy itself was never subtle about what it was doing. Blavatsky openly drew from ancient Gnostic texts, Hindu cosmology, and Western occultism to construct a universal esoteric synthesis. Bailey systematized this into a managerial theology of history, complete with spiritual hierarchies, planetary rulers, and evolutionary stages. Humanity, in this scheme, is not redeemed but upgraded. Icke’s contribution was not innovation but translation. He replaced “archons” with “reptilians,” “aeons” with “dimensions,” and “emanations” with “frequencies.” The skeleton remained intact. The Appeal of Secret Knowledge Gnosticism has always thrived in periods of institutional distrust. It flatters its adherents by offering them an explanation for why they feel alienated: the world really is run by hidden powers, and you are among the few perceptive enough to see it. This is why Icke’s system is immune to ordinary critique. Evidence against it is never neutral; it is always reinterpreted as confirmation of how deep the deception runs. Disagreement becomes proof of spiritual sleep. Failed predictions become evidence of timeline manipulation. Contradiction is absorbed, not resolved. There is no intellectual rigor. Icke’s large catalogue of books have colossal inconsistencies, most havelarge sections have been completely rewritten. He's removed others completely from his books listing. Ancient Gnostic sects functioned the same way. Access to truth was tiered. Public teaching was a decoy. Real knowledge was reserved for the enlightened. The Church Fathers recognized the danger immediately: any system that places truth beyond public testing places power beyond moral restraint. Why This Matters? At first glance, Icke’s worldview may seem merely eccentric. But metaphysics is never idle. What one believes about reality determines what one believes about responsibility, embodiment, and justice. If the material world is a prison, then the body is a liability. If history is manipulated, then moral agency is an illusion. If salvation is escape, then judgment is a myth. This is why Gnostic systems consistently erode accountability while claiming liberation. Evil is always somewhere else — in the archons, the bloodlines, the matrix — never in the will. Redemption becomes informational rather than moral. Love becomes frequency rather than sacrifice. Christianity stands or falls on the opposite claims. Creation is good. The body matters. History is judged. Truth is public. God enters the world not to explain it away, but to redeem it from within. David Icke’s popularity does not signal a new awakening. It signals an old temptation resurfacing in digital form. When trust collapses and institutions fail, Gnosticism always returns, offering certainty without accountability and insight without obedience. The question is not whether there are hidden powers in the world. Scripture itself acknowledges them. The question is whether those powers are ultimate — and whether escape or incarnation is the answer. Icke offers knowledge that lifts you above the world. Christianity offers a God who enters it, suffers in it, and judges it. One flatters the listener. The other humbles everyone. Theosophy: The Engine Behind the Curtain To understand David Icke, one must understand the tradition he both inherits and (later) publicly distances himself from. That tradition is Theosophy—not as a vague spiritual influence, but as a fully formed religious system whose ideas now constitute the backbone of modern New Age belief, globalism, and the idea of the “great awakening”. Icke insists he is fighting a New World Order. What he does not tell his audience is that the metaphysical architecture of his worldview is lifted almost entirely from the very movement that helped give that order its spiritual grammar. Blavatsky and the Recovery of Gnosis Helena Petrovna Blavatsky did not present Theosophy as a new religion. She presented it as the recovery of a secret wisdom allegedly suppressed by Christianity. This is the classic Gnostic move. In The Secret Doctrine (1888), Blavatsky makes the system’s orientation unmistakable. Christianity is not the fulfillment of truth but its corruption. The biblical God is not the Creator but a lesser, ignorant being. Salvation comes not through repentance or grace, but through awakening to hidden knowledge. Her inversion of Christian moral categories is explicit. Writing of Lucifer, Blavatsky declares: “Lucifer represents… the active principle… the rebel against divine tyranny… the light-bringer, the Logos.” Here Satan is not the deceiver but the emancipator. Knowledge, not obedience, becomes the path to liberation. This inversion is not peripheral—it is foundational. Blavatsky also introduced the doctrine of Root Races, teaching that humanity evolves through successive racial-spiritual stages, some superior, some degenerate, guided by hidden masters. History, in this system, is not governed by providence or moral law but by occult evolution. These ideas did not disappear. They metastasized. Annie Besant: Spiritual Evolution Meets Global Governance Annie Besant, Blavatsky’s successor and one-time president of the Theosophical Society, carried these ideas into explicitly political and internationalist forms. Besant was not merely a spiritual teacher; she was deeply involved in globalist thought, social engineering, and international coordination. She openly rejected nationalism, especially Christian Nationalism, and traditional sovereignty in favour of planetary governance guided by enlightened elites. In The Ancient Wisdom, Besant writes: “Man is his own lawgiver… the source of authority lies within himself.” And elsewhere, describing humanity’s future trajectory: “The evolution of man is towards divinity.” Here the Nietzschean echo is unmistakable: man ascending beyond moral law into self-authorship. Christianity, with its doctrines of sin, judgment, and submission to divine authority, had no place in this vision. Besant also advocated the dissolution of national identities in favour of global spiritual unity, arguing that nationalism was a relic of a lower evolutionary stage. This is why Theosophy found natural resonance with early internationalist movements: it supplied a spiritual justification for dissolving borders, traditions, and inherited loyalties. Blavastsky, Bailey and Besant all fervently urged for the replacement of Christianity with Theosophy. When Icke rails against globalism while preaching spiritual evolution, planetary awakening, and post-national consciousness, he is not resisting theosophical tradition. He is re- enacting it. Alice Bailey and the “Plan” If Blavatsky supplied the cosmology and Besant supplied the political instinct, Alice Bailey supplied the administrative theology. Bailey’s writings, produced under the claimed dictation of a non-human intelligence she called “The Tibetan” (Djwhal Khul), present history as the execution of a hidden plan overseen by a spiritual hierarchy. Humanity’s task is not repentance or moral reform, but alignment with this plan through awakening. Bailey is explicit about Christianity’s obsolescence. In The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, she writes: “The era of the Christ is passing away… the new age will be inaugurated.” Elsewhere she insists: “The Christ as He was known is disappearing… a new revelation is taking its place.” Jesus is not denied outright. He is demoted—recast as one enlightened master among many, subordinate to a cosmic hierarchy. Bailey also promoted the idea that a new world order—spiritual, political, and cultural—would emerge as humanity advanced into the Age of Aquarius. She spoke favourably of global institutions as vehicles for this transition, a fact often noted by critics of the United Nations’ early spiritual influences. Whether one interprets this charitably or critically, the pattern is clear: hidden knowledge, elite initiation, managed evolution, and the replacement of Christianity. From Ascended Masters to Reptilians David Icke insists he has rejected Theosophy. In reality, he has merely inverted its moral polarity. Where Bailey spoke of benevolent masters, Icke speaks of malevolent interdimensionals. Where Theosophy spoke of evolution, Icke speaks of imprisonment. But the structure remains identical: Non-human intelligences govern reality History is manipulated behind the scenes Humanity is divided between the awakened and the unconscious Salvation comes through hidden knowledge Christianity is false, corrupt, or deliberately deceptive This is why Icke can denounce Bailey and Blavatsky while reproducing their worldview almost verbatim. Gnostic systems are designed to survive repudiation. Each new revelation simply reclassifies earlier ones as partial, corrupted, or infiltrated. The ladder stays. The labels change. The New Age in One Sentence Virtually every modern New Age staple belief traces directly to Blavatsky and her successors: reincarnation, spiritual evolution, an age of awakening, root races, rejection of the Bible, demotion of Jesus to enlightened teacher, rehabilitation of Lucifer as light-bringer, channelled entities as authorities, and secret knowledge reserved for the awakened elite. None of this is accidental. It is a system. Why Christianity Must Be Neutralized Christianity is intolerable to this system for one reason: it collapses the hierarchy. A God who becomes flesh abolishes secret initiation. A Cross that bears guilt abolishes scapegoating. A final judgment abolishes endless deferral. Christianity does not offer awakening; it calls for repentance. It does not offer evolution; it promises resurrection. It does not offer secret knowledge; it proclaims public truth. This is why Theosophy had to neutralize Christ—and why Icke must portray the biblical God as a villain. He is not rebelling against the system. He is performing his role within it. wilhelmlamb.substack.com/p/theosophy-ex…

The man who warned the world decades ago and was reviled and ridiculed . @davidicke is FULLY vindicated now. If only we had ALL listened to his warnings about these globalist parasite scum ( They are NOT 'elites' ) decades ago .

@Jaytex45 @francisjfoster Because it was Q literally told you to vote for the very people all confirmed in the files doing the actions! He was 100% right Q tried to get everyone to believe that the people doing this were saving us.

@francisjfoster Then why did he call Q bollocks? He's a shill selling lizard people bullshit to retards

Imagine being David Icke, you’ve been proven correct on a cabal of paedos running the world. All you need now is for the royal family to be exposed as a bunch of space lizards & you’re Nostradamus.

@no_mates83871 @davidicke youtu.be/gRTS-Zsd6ZM David Icke and Jordan Maxwell Project Avalon over 15 years ago.

@sarus301 @davidicke maxwell went on record claiming and criticising that icke plagerised his books, Jordan wasn't a happy camper with icke at the time

When I said and wrote in the 1990s that human society was controlled from another dimension and by blood drinking human-non-human hybrids, Alex Jones said that I was 'a turd in the punchbowl' discrediting his credible information about a human-only conspiracy and I was either a conman or working for 'them'. Then he goes on the Rogan show - who refuses to have me on at any price - and claims to be the 'expert' on the same subject. Hilarious. This is Jones on a British TV show in 2001.

@no_mates83871 @davidicke I remember that it was way earlier. They later did interviews together referring to the negative nonhuman factions interfering on the planet including the groups Icke mentions.

@no_mates83871 @davidicke I was there in the 90’s Cooper and all them. Actually that’s not true Jordan Maxwell and Icke are good friends literally interviews of them together. Maxwell credits Icke as the first on a lot of this. Also they both believe and talk about multiple nonhuman intelligences.

@sarus301 @davidicke icke copied and pasted a lot of stuff in his books from other authors like the late great Jordan maxwell, but to give icke credit he has an appendix at the back of his books that mentions sources of information

@no_mates83871 @davidicke No Alex Jones has interviews where he admits and gives Icke credit for exposing this info first. Jones literally has interviews saying the exact same thing on Joe R or podcast way after Icke.

@davidicke blood drinking non human hybrids 😂 Alex jones was RIGHT David icke is a nutter, anyone with an active brain cell on duty could see this with this post

@blab90 @Byrek33 @davidicke Cause he was right where everyone was falling for all these influencers & politicians. He also never fell for the politics left vs right it’s all illusions. You don’t have anyone else today that’s stood their ground like Icke over time.

@Byrek33 @davidicke Tbh you're right, his books are great, but lately all I see is him talking like 'I was here first, I got it before you, I I I, me me me' & shit talking. He talks about ego death and infinite consciousness. But seems very up in his own ego himself.

You didn't begin anything, mate. You just rode its back and now it's bolting as you are being sussed. I can't repost this because he and his brother blocked me years ago.

@dingleberry2786 @redpilldispensr These people are the “sheep” he never said that.

@redpilldispensr He used to claim he was Jesus.

Despite decades of ridicule, David Icke has been right all along.

@Toffeetype1215 @flippineckdude @redpilldispensr They can’t they’ve never read his books a day in their lives. Then what’s even funnier is that they will tell you everything that people like Icke were the first to expose

@flippineckdude @redpilldispensr C'mon back that up

@flippineckdude @redpilldispensr Ah who are you? Where’s your books and interviews from the 90’s when it wasn’t a trend to be awake. Sure tell us something new! Pretty sure you’re going to repeat everything Ickes & others like him have already said. Please enlighten us oh “non-establishment plant” guru.

@redpilldispensr Despite decades of ridicule, David Icke is still an establishment plant.

@MantasJaskys @iluminatibot Prove it enlightened us. Or should we go read your books from the 90’s? Or we should listen to you since you just woke up and are the new authority? People like you say nonsense then repeat everything Icke said like it’s your own and think you’re trendy give us a break.

@iluminatibot He’s a part of the club.

He called it perfectly over a decade ago.

@miltorbica @iluminatibot Then the funny thing is people like you will go on to repeat everything he was the “first to expose.” You have nothing new yall just regurgitate what you hear online. “Plenty of writers write his books” just asinine illogical statements showing you have no clue.

@iluminatibot This is called seeding. david icke never left the bbc, they gave him prime time on the Terry Wogan show in the 80s & plenty of writers write his books. The technique is used 2 acclimatise ppl 2 that which they have planned for the future. These types are 100% part of the machine.

@miltorbica @iluminatibot Jezz you must be young. He literally was the first one stating and warning about what you just wrote. He was ridiculed laughed at and called crazy. The only reason people are listening to him now is because of everything being exposed. Newly awakened people uhg.

@TheUSAPatriot @jackunheard Are y’all slow she’s literally making a joke it’s called satire. Go watch her show she’s mocking the idea

@jackunheard I am SO OVER that mentally ill biotch.

Candace Owens starts her show by dancing to Jewish music. I’ve officially seen it all🤣