Tom Sash

"The outcome, I suspect, will be unshackled growth in the U.S., and across its true ally network, and probable stagnation everywhere else."

The term 'greenhouse effect' is only one of the many metaphors from 40 years of climate crisis. Real greenhouses promote plant growth in a controlled environment. Transparent window panels to allow heat in while preventing cooling airflow. In our open atmosphere, there are no such barriers. It's part of a wider UN PR strategy and the climate crisis is just the mechanism. We saw the jet-setting politicians, bureaucrats and industrialists cruising at 40,000 feet to luxurious annual COP junkets to save the planet. Free wind and sunlight don't provide essential baseload power, yet this sideline is costing the world $9.2 trillion a year to find out (McKinsey, 2022). You can't run a modern war machine on wind-solar or pitchforks and you can't have modern society either. These things should be self evident. President Donald Trump is the first of today's international leaders to cancel the global warming policy trajectory. He shouldn't be the last.

@PierrePoilievre youtube.com/watch?v=Q0jqfK…

The CEO of the only company that could build the pipeline to the Pacific lists the five things standing in the way. All five of them are…. Mark Carney. Don’t believe me, listen for yourself.

Seven-year-old Cassidy Baracka vomited for over eight hours following her first Covid mRNA injection. She was then administered a second injection, which proved fatal. And yet her death certificate attributes her death to Covid-19.

Finland tracked every gender-referred adolescent in the country for up to 25 years. Their psychiatric needs didn't improve after 'gender reassignment'. They surged. A landmark peer-reviewed study just dropped. Here's what it found. 🧵

@jonburkeUK x.com/OPECSecretaria…

Sorry, but the world’s largest wind turbine is DEC’s 26 MW unit. 60 to 70 of them produce the equivalent poser of a nuclear plant, even taking into account capacity factor. They can be up and running in 1-2 years & cost a fraction of nuclear. That’s why renewables are winning.

@jonburkeUK x.com/TheBrawlStreet…

Nicholas, thanks for replying. It is impossible to fully frame and surround the few words in a "Tweet" with full context and qualifications...so, yes, hydro is indeed ultimately weather dependent, but it is also dispatchable, on-demand energy, within limits. Those limits must be considered as Brazil, for example, found out with their recent drought. However, hydro also serves purposes for flood control, agriculture, water borne navigation, etc. So...no, I do not ultimately put hydro in the same categories as wind and solar. Wind and solar installations are constructed only for the purpose of generating weather dependent electricity. As I stated in my post, wind and solar installations will always require government subsidies and they will always increase total system costs, which means they will always be impoverishment vehicles to the societies pursuing them. With regard to the "modern grid", its architecture does date back to the turn of the century, but that architecture has seen continual evolution, improvement, and arguably, modern grids are the most complex machines ever constructed by man. A grid's purpose is to supply electricity of specific phase, specific voltage, and specific amperage, upon demand 24/7/365. That electricity "demand" is manifested by "switches", human activated switches. There is no switch on earth which compels the sun to shine or the wind to blow. Since wind and solar junk energies are inherently, completely, totally, and inalterably blind to demand, wind and solar energies are fundamentally NOT suitable to serve human demands for electrical power. Since wind and solar output are inherently, completely, totally, and inalterably blind to demand, there are very limited physical means to negate this fundamental defect and utilize these energies for human utilization. One can: --send the chaotic energy outputs to some type of storage, e.g. pumped hydro, batteries, within the input limits of the receiving devices. --send the chaotic energy outputs to a device which is agnostic to voltage and phasing within the receiving device's input limits--e.g. a radiant solar water heater, or a resistive heating coil. --send the chaotic energy outputs to the grid. This grid access by wind and solar energies is never discussed by the Green zealots. The ONLY way wind and solar junk energies can achieve access to the grid is by starting with a balanced grid where dispatchable generating sources have responded to grid demand, and then from that balanced state, grid operators can take deliberate actions to manipulate dispatchable generation output, primarily thermal generation output, to achieve "desired" generation source objectives. Continual manipulation of dispatchable generation--both additions of, and subtractions of, dispatchable generation, is required to maintain grid frequency while BOTH accommodating the W&S chaotic inputs and fulfilling grid demand. Since there is no switch on earth which can compel the sun to shine, nor the wind to blow, in response to demand, every single kW of wind and solar junk energies, when producing, can ONLY temporarily displace--NOT replace-- dispatchable generation, primarily thermal generation. Wind and solar are not able, and will never be able, to respond to demand. The manual, human manipulation of dispatchable power on a grid is the only physical means of responding to the chaotic wind and solar inputs...all while balancing on a tightrope which maintains grid frequency and phasing, and which satisfies demand. The more wind and solar is added, the more this chaotic generation must be reversed mirrored, which then causes increased capacity impairment in the thermal generation, at additional cost, not including costs of grid balancing, not including the costs of the zero inertia electricity provided by inverter based generation, not including the capital costs of the solar, nor including the capital costs of additional transmission capacity, and not including the management costs of the solar. The wind and solar pathway to "sustainable energy" is a total lie, a fraud, a con, and a delusion, a delusion of astonishing depth and breadth. It is physically impossible. This whole series is a good read: richardlyon.substack.com/p/chapter-1-th…

@sash_tom @7Kiwi I assume you are excluding hydro as it too depends on the rain. Interesting that you use rhe term “modern grid” to describe a grid system architecture that dates back to the turn of the 20th century more than 100 years ago. Hardly “modern”. Time to look forward not back.

We're facing an energy crisis that is going to require radical solutions to solve. Many countries are ramping up coal-fired electricity generation in response. Is it time for the UK to go for Coal not Cold? A thread (1/n)

Atlas: "We should absolutely pass laws that forbid lockdowns, that forbid gov't from imposing shutdowns on businesses, on churches—we have freedom of assembly in this country... [our liberties have] been completely lost by this expansion of government into our personal lives."

Climate campaigners tell you green is cheap It isn't Global green transition cost is now $14+ trillion, rising with over $2 trillion/year (2% of global GDP) 105x our spending to avoid hunger Still, CO₂ emissions set another record last year assets.bbhub.io/professional/s…

"But nobody goes to war over solar panels for the same reason nobody goes to war over candles: they cannot power the things that economies, civilizations, and wars run on....The fact that nobody wages war over solar panels is evidence of their limitations not superiority.” x.com/sash_tom/statu…

900 battery-powered ships and counting: It isn't a test case anymore, it’s a declaration of independence from being fossil fuel hostages: With battery costs down 99% since 1991, the "too expensive" excuse is officially dead for shipping Sovereignty is renewables ft.com/content/06563c…

Meanwhile, in the real world. All time world record consumption of natural gas in 2025. All time world record consumption of oil in 2025. All time world record consumption of coal in 2025. The modern world has been built with, and is sustained and maintained by, the products and energies of the wondrous, wonderful hydrocarbons. The world will NEVER transition away from these wondrous, and wonderful, resources. Expect greater hydrocarbon consumption in 3026 than the consumption in 2026. voronoiapp.com/energy/What-Po…

Who to believe? The IPCC tells us that Australia emits a net 437.5 megatons of carbon dioxide into the air and that we should spend $Trillions of dollars to reduce it. But The GOSAT Satellites that accurately measure the actual near surface carbon dioxide flux show that Australia adsorbs a net 788 megatons of carbon dioxide from the air and doesn't need to spend a cent on reducing its carbon dioxide emissions.

Democrat NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani is launching a “racial equity plan” designed to solve "decades of discrimination" by prioritizing resources for "black and brown" people. Straight-up racism against White people

A great example of how the Green Grift works in the real world...charge ratepayors for non-dispatchable surplus un-demanded "green" energy which the grid operator sells off at reduced price to move the unwanted, un-demanded green junk energy. IESO managed to only obtain about $1,342,700 for what they sold via the intertie connections at the average price of $21.06 MWh so methinks it cost us dearly as that only reduced our costs to $10,245,386! Wow, Wind Solar and Battery Storage Ontario Ratepayers Consumed, Cost 56 Cents/kWh …tenergyperspectivesblog.wordpress.com/2026/04/06/wow…

Read more from @MarkPMills: city-journal.org/article/strait…

Headlines you won't read in a newsletter...

We're told the green transition is cheap. It most certainly is not. Global spending has exceeded $14 trillion with annual investment now standing at over $2 trillion (or roughly 2% of global GDP). That is more than 100 times what's spent tackling world hunger. And we're getting nothing for that money. Global CO2 emissions hit another record high last year (largely thanks to China). There is no green energy "transition" underway - just an expensive "layering" on top of an expanding fossil fuel base. We are being lied to.