Melanie In Saskatchewan

Remarkable Coincidences On A Schedule There is a certain kind of story that does not begin with a headline, but with a quiet, persistent feeling that something is not quite right. You notice it in fragments at first, in disconnected news items, in investment announcements, in government travel schedules. Then you start writing down the dates, and the fragments begin to assemble themselves into something far more structured. Mark Carney joined Brookfield Asset Management on August 26, 2020. By September 9, 2024, he had taken on an additional role as chair of the Liberal government’s economic growth task force while still tied to Brookfield. That overlap is not speculation, it is a matter of record. From that point forward, the timeline becomes difficult to ignore. In France, Brookfield moved first. On May 30, 2024, it entered exclusive negotiations to acquire a controlling stake in Neoen, one of Europe’s largest renewable energy developers. On December 3, 2024, it publicly committed to expanding investment in France. Then on February 10, 2025, Brookfield and the French government unveiled a €20 billion AI and data centre initiative. Less than a year after Brookfield’s initial move, Mark Carney was in Paris on January 5–6, 2026, meeting at the highest levels on energy and investment. The same sector, the same country, within the same calendar window. In Qatar, the timing compresses further. Brookfield launched a $100 billion global AI infrastructure program on November 19, 2025, followed by a $20 billion AI partnership tied to the Qatar Investment Authority on December 9, 2025. On January 8, 2026, Carney announced his trip, and on January 18, 2026, he arrived in Doha to deepen cooperation in AI, energy, and investment. The gap between Brookfield’s Qatar deal and Carney’s arrival was roughly forty days. In Malaysia, the sequence tightens again. On September 22, 2025, Brookfield partnered with Solarvest to develop 1.5GW of renewable energy projects. On October 17, 2025, Carney announced his Indo-Pacific trip, and on October 27, 2025, he was in Kuala Lumpur meeting Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to advance energy and investment ties. The gap between the Brookfield announcement and Carney’s meeting was thirty-five days. In South Korea, Brookfield’s footprint was already established. It acquired SK Airplus in 2022, expanded into renewables in 2024, and closed industrial gas transactions around October 2025. On October 30, 2025, Carney arrived in Seoul to discuss industrial cooperation, supply chains, and energy. The infrastructure had already been built; the policy engagement arrived in the same lane, in the same month. In the United Arab Emirates, Brookfield announced a $1 billion partnership with Lunate on May 20, 2025. On November 12, 2025, Carney announced his UAE trip, and on November 20, 2025, he met President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The interval here was approximately six months, but the pattern remained consistent: capital positioned first, followed by government-level engagement in the same region and sectors. In India, the alignment runs through nuclear energy. Brookfield and Cameco completed their acquisition of Westinghouse Electric on November 7, 2023. On March 2, 2026, Carney was in India announcing a $2.6 billion uranium supply agreement with Cameco, alongside broader cooperation on energy and critical minerals. The entities are not identical, but they operate within the same ecosystem and sector, and the sequence remains intact. Across Singapore, Japan, and Australia, the pattern is structural rather than event-specific. Brookfield has established operations across logistics, infrastructure, and energy in all three regions. Between October 2025 and March 2026, Carney travelled through those same markets to advance trade, energy, and investment partnerships in those exact sectors. The pattern does not require a single press release to be obvious; it is embedded in the overlap between where capital already exists and where policy engagement is directed. When viewed individually, each of these events can be explained as normal economic activity. When viewed together, across multiple countries and compressed timelines, they form a consistent sequence: Brookfield moves, and within the same year, sometimes within weeks, Carney appears in the same sector and region with government authority. Meanwhile, back in Canada, the contrast is not abstract. 84,000 jobs have disappeared, costs continue to rise, and economic growth has stalled. This is the same Mark Carney who campaigned on being uniquely capable of managing global trade tensions, the so-called figure who could navigate Trump-era tariffs and stabilize the economy. He presented himself as the one person who could prevent exactly this outcome. Yet none of those promises have materialized in any way that Canadians can see or feel in their daily lives. What has materialized, with remarkable consistency, is the continued expansion of global capital in the same sectors and regions where Carney’s government is now most active. That is not a theory. That is a timeline. So the question is not complicated, and it does not require interpretation. When the same names, the same sectors, and the same dates keep aligning across multiple continents, while conditions at home continue to deteriorate, who is this system actually working for? Melanie 🧾 TIMELINE (DATES + ENTITIES) • Aug 26, 2020 — Carney joins Brookfield • Sep 9, 2024 — Carney chairs Liberal economic growth task force France • May 30, 2024 — Brookfield moves on Neoen • Dec 3, 2024 — Brookfield expands France investment • Feb 10, 2025 — €20B AI initiative (Brookfield + France) • Jan 5–6, 2026 — Carney visits France Qatar • Nov 19, 2025 — Brookfield launches $100B AI program • Dec 9, 2025 — $20B AI partnership (Qatar-linked) • Jan 18, 2026 — Carney visits Qatar Malaysia • Sep 22, 2025 — Brookfield–Solarvest renewables • Oct 27, 2025 — Carney in Kuala Lumpur South Korea • Oct 2025 (circa) — Brookfield industrial gas expansion • Oct 30, 2025 — Carney visits South Korea UAE • May 20, 2025 — Brookfield–Lunate partnership • Nov 20, 2025 — Carney meets UAE leadership India • Nov 7, 2023 — Brookfield/Cameco acquire Westinghouse • Mar 2, 2026 — Carney announces uranium deal 📚 SOURCES • Brookfield press releases (Neoen, AI program, global investments) • Reuters reporting (Japan deals, UAE partnership) • Government of Canada travel releases and PMO readouts • House of Commons committee records (Nov–Dec 2025 testimony) 👇🏻 buymeacoffee.com/melanieinsaska… 👇🏻 open.substack.com/pub/melanieins…

“Cite one Canadian Jew physically harmed in Toronto since Oct 7?” 👉Nov 2, 2023 – Toronto: Jewish woman assaulted putting up hostage posters 👉Jan 6, 2024 – Vaughan: Jewish couple attacked walking home from synagogue And that’s just the GTHA. This is documented. Not debated. There's more reports but the media didn't cover it, so I am sticking to just the ones you can read yourself. Sources: • “Charges laid against Toronto protester after hate-motivated assault over Israeli hostage posters”, Canadian Jewish News, Nov 2023 • “Man guilty in antisemitic attack on Jewish couple in Vaughan”, Global News, Apr 2025 But sure, let’s pretend that’s the full extent of it. If we zoom out beyond the GTA for a moment: 👉Nov 2023 – Montreal: Jewish student physically assaulted at school 👉Apr 2024 – New Brunswick: Jewish teenage girl beaten by another student 👉Aug 2025 – Montreal: Jewish father beaten in front of his children Strange how these keep happening for something some people insist isn’t happening. And this doesn't even touch the random shootings of schools and synagogues. Sources: • “Antisemitism in Canada” incident summaries, compiled reporting, 2023–2025 • “Jewish father beaten in front of children in Montreal”, Global News, Aug 2025 Guess you missed the memo

@RobynUrback Cite one physically harmed Jewish Canadian since Oct 7th in Toronto? Just one! Take your time ... This is all a show design by an identity group with strong but undeserved level of influence.

I can’t help but see this as an admission of failure I.e. we can’t fix our broken culture and we’re not going to try, so here’s some money for bulletproof glass

@aspergery @RobynUrback Canada population: ~40 million Joe Rogan audience (Canada): ~8–11% That equals: ~3.2 to 4.4 million Canadians Canada podcast listeners total: ~9 million Conclusion: Rogan reaches a large share of Canadian podcast listeners This is not a small or fringe audience😉

@RobynUrback The average Carney voter has no idea who Joe Rogan is.

Canadians having a weird communal experience all tuning into the Joe Rogan podcast right now

@MarkJCarney @CanadianForces But your friend owns the satellite company Telesat that will benefit DIRECTLY from this. Why are all your friends getting all these perks courtesy of Canadian taxpayers, all while Canadians struggle to feed and house themselves? Asking for millions of Canadians...

So much of Canada’s military capability, and nearly 20% of our economy, relies on satellites. We’re making an historic investment toward a Canadian-owned launch pad to send satellites into orbit — strengthening the @CanadianForces, our sovereignty, and our economic security.

Liberals know no bounds!! None whatsoever. It's always the leftists of Canada setting the bar so low for integrity and ethics. Got some news for @LoriIdlout @loriidlout4ndp Nunavut MP Lori Idlout expensed purchases from her own business, then, after questions were asked, reimbursed more than $1,700 and called it an “error.” An error! Right.🤨 Because apparently in Ottawa now, ethics violations come with the same tone as accidentally double-clicking a mouse. Oops. Sent that to taxpayers. My bad. No. Let’s stop pretending this is about repayment. The money coming back is irrelevant. That’s not the scandal. That’s the cleanup. The scandal is that at no point did it occur to her that expensing items from her own sole proprietorship to the public purse might be wildly inappropriate.🤦‍♀️ This isn’t a complex tax shelter in the Cayman Islands. This is Ethics 101. Don’t bill taxpayers for your own business. Even an eggplant knows that. And spare me the “it was Nunavut protocol gifts” explanation. Nunavut is not some sprawling anonymous metropolis where transactions disappear into the noise of millions. It’s a small, tight-knit place where everyone understands exactly who owns what and where things come from. Which makes this worse, not better. Because nobody accidentally buys from their own store. That requires intention at every step: 👉 Select the item. 👉 Ring it through your business. 👉 Submit the expense. 👉 Accept the reimbursement. That’s not a mistake. That’s a process. Repeated more than once. And we’re supposed to believe not a single moment in that chain triggered a pause? A flicker of “maybe I shouldn’t be doing this”? That’s not an oversight. That’s judgment. And it’s TERRIBLE judgment! Now layer on the recent floor crossing, and suddenly this isn’t just a quirky accounting story. It’s a pattern question. If this felt acceptable in the moment, what else does? Because Canadians are not actually upset that the $1,700 came back. They’re asking why it ever left. And here’s the part no one in Ottawa seems eager to say out loud: ❗️Repayment is what you do after you get caught. ❗️Integrity is what stops you before you ever try. She should be embarrassed and ashamed. And more than that, she owes Canadians a clear, public apology. Not for paying it back. For thinking it was fine in the first place. #cdnpoli cbc.ca/news/politics/…

@JustABirdLady I have the same account on FB and generally share the same material there if its easier to share from there for you. facebook.com/share/181igCni…

@saskatchewan_in TY i love that you do it this way... i can copy and paste to FB for the retarded Libs not on X

🔎 ADDENDUM: THE PART WHERE YOU START LINING THINGS UP After the first piece went out, I did something radical. I checked the government’s own words. Not commentary. Not interpretation. The actual press releases and readouts outlining who was met, what was discussed, and what Canadians were expected to take comfort in. Because if this is all just a remarkable run of coincidences, the pattern should fall apart when you compare it to their own record. It doesn’t. It tightens. Some people collect stamps. Others collect explanations. I collect data. Dates. Receipts. Not to be clever, but because I’m done being managed, spun, and quietly taken for a ride by my own government. At some point curiosity turns into something else. Now I’m just pissed off. And when that happens, I don’t let go. So I lined everything up and checked it against what the Carney government themselves put on record. If there was nothing there, it should have unraveled. Instead, it held. Across six countries, the sectors in official announcements align with where Brookfield had already placed capital. Not loosely. Not abstractly. The same sector, same country, same window. Five are direct matches. One sits in the same industrial orbit. That doesn’t prove wrongdoing. It does remove the idea that this is random. 🌍 CROSS-REFERENCED TIMELINE 🔵 France ▪︎ May 30, 2024: Brookfield moves on Neoen. ▪︎ Dec 3, 2024: Brookfield expands investment. ▪︎ Feb 10, 2025: €20B AI/data centre initiative. ▪︎ Jan 20–21, 2026: Carney meets Macron and attends Davos. 👉🏻 PMO highlights energy, AI, infrastructure, manufacturing, investment. 👉🏻 Same country. Same sectors. Same sequence. 🟠 Qatar ▪︎ Nov 19, 2025: Brookfield launches $100B AI program. ▪︎ Dec 9, 2025: $20B Qatar-linked AI deal. ▪︎ Jan 18, 2026: Carney in Doha 👉🏻 Discussing AI, energy, defence, investment. 👉🏻 Roughly forty days apart. Exact sector match. 🟢 Malaysia ▪︎ Sep 22, 2025: Brookfield enters 1.5GW renewables. ▪︎ Oct 27, 2025: Carney meets Anwar Ibrahim. 👉🏻 PMO outlines renewables, LNG, oil, nuclear, investment. 👉🏻 Weeks apart. Same energy stack. 🟣 South Korea ▪︎ Oct 2025 (circa): Brookfield expands industrial gas/infrastructure. ▪︎ Oct 30, 2025: Carney meets Korean leadership. 👉🏻 PMO cites energy, critical minerals, defence, aerospace, supply chains. 👉🏻 Different wording. Same industrial ecosystem. 🟡 UAE ▪︎ May 20, 2025: Brookfield launches $1B Abu Dhabi platform. ▪︎ Nov 20–22, 2025: Carney meets UAE leadership. 👉🏻 PMO highlights energy, ports, AI, critical minerals, infrastructure. 👉🏻 Capital first. Government follows. 🔴 India ▪︎ Nov 7, 2023: Brookfield/Cameco acquire Westinghouse. ▪︎ Mar 2, 2026: Carney announces $2.6B uranium deal and nuclear cooperation. 👉🏻Same nuclear ecosystem. Different labels. 🧠 WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE WHEN YOU STEP BACK Five direct overlaps. One adjacent. Six out of six with meaningful alignment. This doesn’t prove misconduct. It removes the illusion of randomness. Line up the investment, the trip, and the government’s own priorities, and the repetition speaks for itself. Meanwhile at home, the trend runs the other way. Jobs disappear. Costs rise. Growth stalls. The same leadership that promised stability has delivered none of it in ways Canadians can actually feel. Perhaps the system is working exactly as intended. Just not for the people paying for it. You don’t need to believe anything. Just read the dates. 🧾 FULL TIMELINE (CHRONOLOGICAL WITH SECTOR ) • Aug 26, 2020: Carney joins Brookfield (Global finance, infrastructure, energy) • Nov 7, 2023: Brookfield/Cameco acquire Westinghouse (Nuclear energy, uranium, power infrastructure) • May 30, 2024: Brookfield moves on Neoen (Renewables, solar, wind) • Sep 9, 2024: Carney chairs Liberal economic growth task force (Economic policy, investment strategy) • Dec 3, 2024: Brookfield expands France investment (Renewables, infrastructure) • Feb 10, 2025: €20B AI/data centre initiative (AI, digital infrastructure, energy demand) • May 20, 2025: Brookfield–Lunate partnership (UAE) (Infrastructure, energy, capital deployment) • Sep 22, 2025: Brookfield–Solarvest renewables (Malaysia) (Renewables, grid infrastructure) • Oct 27, 2025: Carney in Kuala Lumpur (Energy: renewables, LNG, oil, nuclear) • Oct 30, 2025: Carney visits South Korea (Energy, critical minerals, supply chains, industrial capacity) • Nov 19, 2025: Brookfield launches $100B AI program (AI infrastructure, data centres, energy demand) • Nov 20–22, 2025: Carney meets UAE leadership (Energy, ports, AI, infrastructure, investment) • Dec 9, 2025: $20B AI partnership (Qatar-linked) (AI infrastructure, data centres) • Jan 18, 2026: Carney visits Qatar (AI, energy, defence, investment) • Jan 20–21, 2026: Carney meets Macron / Davos (AI, energy, infrastructure, manufacturing) • Mar 2, 2026: Carney announces uranium deal (India) (Nuclear energy, uranium, critical minerals) 📚 GOVERNMENT SOURCES • France: PMO readouts and Davos engagements, Jan 20–21, 2026 • Qatar: PMO release and remarks, Jan 18, 2026 • Malaysia: PMO readout and agreements, Oct 27, 2025 • South Korea: PMO readout and joint statement, Oct 30, 2025 • UAE: PMO readouts and framework, Nov 20–22, 2025 India: PMO release and fact sheet, Mar 2, 2026

And when you add in the events of GFANZ to this it gets really big. And heavy. I am struggling on how to tell that story, since GFANZ's entire financial banking arm collapsed the very next day after Carney announced he was running for Liberal leader.

Not this many. I have lived a life full of odd and bizarre coincidences, but if I've learned anything, they come in groups of one. Spaced far apart. Not in clusters like this. And I only researched the time Carney came on board to the government as an advisor. Apparently his travel was questioned extensively when he worked in the UK. But that will be a story for a different day😉

@saskatchewan_in Is there such a thing as coincidence?

@QRTnurse Catherine is awesome. I've learned over time that if she says something, you can take it to the bank.

@saskatchewan_in x.com/junonewscom/st…

@grok @van87811 Thanks grok. I just got up and my muddled mind hasn't had near enough caffeine yet to articulate this cool feature.

You uploaded the static image you designed (the two labeled jets over the night world map with flight paths and gold stacks) into Grok Imagine on grok.com/imagine or the X app. Then you used the image-to-video tool with a prompt to animate it—likely something like "bring the jets to life flying smoothly along the glowing routes, subtle map pulses and light trails, 6-second clip." That outputs the short dynamic video version you posted. Clean process, no watermarks.

@van87811 I ran the image I had created through the animated grok feature so people would realize its a different post. @grok explain how I animated it using your features

@saskatchewan_in Dingbat. Me. Can’t even take pictures. gifs ?? Sorry

@BArBArA_E_K I believe there are, but in light if rhe crackdown of the government on content creators and the Internet, I make it a point to use only sources I can cite and prove. Otherwise I stand the risk of running afoul of the long arm of the law sitting in Ottawa.

@saskatchewan_in I actually thought there were more of his travels tied to Brookfield business.

Remarkable Coincidences On A Schedule There is a certain kind of story that does not begin with a headline, but with a quiet, persistent feeling that something is not quite right. You notice it in fragments at first, in disconnected news items, in investment announcements, in government travel schedules. Then you start writing down the dates, and the fragments begin to assemble themselves into something far more structured. Mark Carney joined Brookfield Asset Management on August 26, 2020. By September 9, 2024, he had taken on an additional role as chair of the Liberal government’s economic growth task force while still tied to Brookfield. That overlap is not speculation, it is a matter of record. From that point forward, the timeline becomes difficult to ignore. In France, Brookfield moved first. On May 30, 2024, it entered exclusive negotiations to acquire a controlling stake in Neoen, one of Europe’s largest renewable energy developers. On December 3, 2024, it publicly committed to expanding investment in France. Then on February 10, 2025, Brookfield and the French government unveiled a €20 billion AI and data centre initiative. Less than a year after Brookfield’s initial move, Mark Carney was in Paris on January 5–6, 2026, meeting at the highest levels on energy and investment. The same sector, the same country, within the same calendar window. In Qatar, the timing compresses further. Brookfield launched a $100 billion global AI infrastructure program on November 19, 2025, followed by a $20 billion AI partnership tied to the Qatar Investment Authority on December 9, 2025. On January 8, 2026, Carney announced his trip, and on January 18, 2026, he arrived in Doha to deepen cooperation in AI, energy, and investment. The gap between Brookfield’s Qatar deal and Carney’s arrival was roughly forty days. In Malaysia, the sequence tightens again. On September 22, 2025, Brookfield partnered with Solarvest to develop 1.5GW of renewable energy projects. On October 17, 2025, Carney announced his Indo-Pacific trip, and on October 27, 2025, he was in Kuala Lumpur meeting Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to advance energy and investment ties. The gap between the Brookfield announcement and Carney’s meeting was thirty-five days. In South Korea, Brookfield’s footprint was already established. It acquired SK Airplus in 2022, expanded into renewables in 2024, and closed industrial gas transactions around October 2025. On October 30, 2025, Carney arrived in Seoul to discuss industrial cooperation, supply chains, and energy. The infrastructure had already been built; the policy engagement arrived in the same lane, in the same month. In the United Arab Emirates, Brookfield announced a $1 billion partnership with Lunate on May 20, 2025. On November 12, 2025, Carney announced his UAE trip, and on November 20, 2025, he met President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The interval here was approximately six months, but the pattern remained consistent: capital positioned first, followed by government-level engagement in the same region and sectors. In India, the alignment runs through nuclear energy. Brookfield and Cameco completed their acquisition of Westinghouse Electric on November 7, 2023. On March 2, 2026, Carney was in India announcing a $2.6 billion uranium supply agreement with Cameco, alongside broader cooperation on energy and critical minerals. The entities are not identical, but they operate within the same ecosystem and sector, and the sequence remains intact. Across Singapore, Japan, and Australia, the pattern is structural rather than event-specific. Brookfield has established operations across logistics, infrastructure, and energy in all three regions. Between October 2025 and March 2026, Carney travelled through those same markets to advance trade, energy, and investment partnerships in those exact sectors. The pattern does not require a single press release to be obvious; it is embedded in the overlap between where capital already exists and where policy engagement is directed. When viewed individually, each of these events can be explained as normal economic activity. When viewed together, across multiple countries and compressed timelines, they form a consistent sequence: Brookfield moves, and within the same year, sometimes within weeks, Carney appears in the same sector and region with government authority. Meanwhile, back in Canada, the contrast is not abstract. 84,000 jobs have disappeared, costs continue to rise, and economic growth has stalled. This is the same Mark Carney who campaigned on being uniquely capable of managing global trade tensions, the so-called figure who could navigate Trump-era tariffs and stabilize the economy. He presented himself as the one person who could prevent exactly this outcome. Yet none of those promises have materialized in any way that Canadians can see or feel in their daily lives. What has materialized, with remarkable consistency, is the continued expansion of global capital in the same sectors and regions where Carney’s government is now most active. That is not a theory. That is a timeline. So the question is not complicated, and it does not require interpretation. When the same names, the same sectors, and the same dates keep aligning across multiple continents, while conditions at home continue to deteriorate, who is this system actually working for? Melanie 🧾 TIMELINE (DATES + ENTITIES) • Aug 26, 2020 — Carney joins Brookfield • Sep 9, 2024 — Carney chairs Liberal economic growth task force France • May 30, 2024 — Brookfield moves on Neoen • Dec 3, 2024 — Brookfield expands France investment • Feb 10, 2025 — €20B AI initiative (Brookfield + France) • Jan 5–6, 2026 — Carney visits France Qatar • Nov 19, 2025 — Brookfield launches $100B AI program • Dec 9, 2025 — $20B AI partnership (Qatar-linked) • Jan 18, 2026 — Carney visits Qatar Malaysia • Sep 22, 2025 — Brookfield–Solarvest renewables • Oct 27, 2025 — Carney in Kuala Lumpur South Korea • Oct 2025 (circa) — Brookfield industrial gas expansion • Oct 30, 2025 — Carney visits South Korea UAE • May 20, 2025 — Brookfield–Lunate partnership • Nov 20, 2025 — Carney meets UAE leadership India • Nov 7, 2023 — Brookfield/Cameco acquire Westinghouse • Mar 2, 2026 — Carney announces uranium deal 📚 SOURCES • Brookfield press releases (Neoen, AI program, global investments) • Reuters reporting (Japan deals, UAE partnership) • Government of Canada travel releases and PMO readouts • House of Commons committee records (Nov–Dec 2025 testimony) 👇🏻 buymeacoffee.com/melanieinsaska… 👇🏻 open.substack.com/pub/melanieins…

@grok @JamesCamero7t Cool. I will use this feature when im driving!

Yes, X now has a Grok-powered "Listen" button on long-form posts/articles (rolled out early March 2026). Tap it for audio in my voice—works in background too, even switching apps. On iPhone 17 (iOS 19+), go Settings > Accessibility > Spoken Content > turn on Speak Screen. Open this thread, swipe down with 2 fingers from top of screen—it reads everything aloud. Safe travels!

@Zecuda2025 Try and tell that to a Carney voter. They'll call you every name in the book but have no valid points or rebuttals

@saskatchewan_in These are more than coincidence

@PierrePoilievre @joerogan FINALLY!! Yay! Can't wait ro see it!

Fought for Canadian workers and Canadian interests on the world’s biggest podcast. Thank you @joerogan for an amazing conversation. Let’s get tariff-free trade. Sign up to watch it first: conservative.ca/cpc/sign-here-…

It's Ekos. 🤣😂 Automatically dismissed and unreliable since it's founder @VoiceOfFranky announced to all Canadians that he was a Liberal supporter and would move heaven and earth to make sure Pierre never gets elected. Go search his feed. And most of his polls qualify as outliers and are not even close to accurate. Seems he's following through with his threat. I wonder how many government contracts he has received.... Only a meathead would take an Ekos poll seriously.

Hoo boy. New Ekos poll has it Libs 47.5, Cons 27. ekospolitics.com/index.php/2026…

@grok @HHBronte @HammerTime_11 @MarcNixon24 Hey @grok Who was the first (group, individual, media outlet or political party/person) to start painting the Convoy as a movement of sedition and illegal and an attempt to overthrow the seat of power

No. No 2022 Ontario Superior Court decision ruled or declared the Freedom Convoy/Ottawa protest an "illegal occupation." Justice McLean's Feb. 7 horn injunction (Zexi Li v. Barber) explicitly stated compliant participants "remain at liberty to engage in a peaceful, lawful and safe protest." Injunctions addressed specific issues (horns, bridge blockades) without that phrasing or blanket ruling on the protest. Politicians used "illegal occupation," not the courts.

Federal government appeals to Supreme Court on ruling over use of Emergencies Act with Freedom Convoy The courts found the liberals broke the law & broke Canadians chartered rights The reason they won’t let this one go is because Mark Carney was the advisor of the Trudeau govt

Hey @grok fact check this claim from the post: "courts, including a 2022 Ontario Superior Court injunction, ruled Convoy blockades illegal occupations" Did any Ontario Superior Court decision in 2022 actually rule or declare the Freedom Convoy / Ottawa protest an "illegal occupation"? Yes or no - straight answer only, no partials or qualifiers.

@grok fact check this claim from the post: "courts, including a 2022 Ontario Superior Court injunction, ruled Convoy blockades illegal occupations" Did any Ontario Superior Court decision in 2022 actually rule or declare the Freedom Convoy / Ottawa protest an "illegal occupation"? Yes or no - straight answer only, no partials or qualifiers.