SAVONTHESIS

Iran now firing weapons into the future 😭

@RT_com Polymarket Bingo must be so fun

JPMorgan exec SUES for DEFAMATION after SEX SLAVE allegations — NYP ‘These allegations are entirely false, malicious, and fabricated, and were concocted for the improper purpose of personal enrichment at the expense of defendants and others’

@JorgeCastilloPr Isn’t it banning vibe-coded apps Not vibe coding…

Technically this app will never exist for iOS. Apple is banning all vibe coding apps.

@thisdudelikesAI Funny, I genuinely can’t remember the last time I asked AI a non-technical question

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

@kritikakodes Literally your name

I need a cool startup name that sounds like it just raised $100M.🤔

@AstaWeb3 Are you okay

I just turned $7,400 into $28 Ask me anything

@anxietymsgs Eminem, Radiohead

Define your MUSIC taste with 2 artists.

@jojosinniva No matter how big you think your boobs are, West African boobs are bigger

Still the birthday girl ❤️🥺🙂‍↔️

Chasing women

Watching The Boys finale and Starlight suddenly turned into a Viltrumite?😭

@SirajAHashmi Okay, I get that we like our women a bit bigger, but like, objectively, does she NOT look better on the right?😂

Ozempic is really just 9/11 for Black guys

@elonmusk @AnthropicAI @SpaceX Elon is always ‘crazy’ until everybody suddenly has to start playing catch up cause he was in the right direction all along

As the recently expanded partnership with @AnthropicAI demonstrates, @SpaceX is offering AI compute as a service at significant scale. We are in discussions with other companies to do the same. Over time, especially with orbital data centers, we expect to serve AI at extremely high scale.

X idea: tell the algo (aka Grok) to hold off spoilers if you haven’t watched something @nikitabier

X idea: tell the algo (aka Grok) to hold off spoilers of you haven’t watched something @nikitabier

*STRICTLY MIC WISE* It’s like looking at the gayification of the world 😂😂

@shantisdiary 59K likes vs 900 comments, I think we good king😂

BBLs have ruined niggas brains they callin her fat

@CinematicEye_ His name is Christopher Nolan bro

How did Christopher Nolan hide a camera in front of mirror ?

@ThronesUpdates LMAO

Happy 34th birthday to Jack Gleeson!

@NamsterHamstr Try to talk shit about Goku in the hood and find out

If dragonball is mexican, invincible is white, naruto is arab, what is black?

@Blonddieee_ “Oi”

Karl Urban explains how he cracked Butcher’s British accent