Stuart Black 🦊🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

True, one's first concern whenever laying down flowers for a dear friend is always to check the cameras are getting the good shot👇

Over 115 million website requests in 10 days. People are seeing what israel did, that is for sure. It is a big weight off our shoulders to know that many website mirrors now exist around the world, and that this archive can never be deleted. Thanks to all those who helped get the word out & who downloaded copies/ are seeding this project on torrents. We are working on uploading the remaining footage to the live site in the coming weeks. x.com/xIsraelExposed…

The Trump administration has launched effort to ‘dismantle’ the International Criminal Court, per WSJ The U.S. never even joined the International Criminal Court. Washington refused to ratify the Rome Statute, rejected the court’s jurisdiction over Americans, and has repeatedly opposed investigations into U.S. personnel. Yet for years, the ICC was embraced politically when it prosecuted leaders and officials from countries that opposed or challenged the Western-led order. Now that the court has turned its attention to Israel and their US sponsors, the Trump administration reportedly wants to dismantle it. The United States spent decades championing the ICC when it was prosecuting leaders in the Balkans, Africa, and elsewhere. It praised “international justice” when the court’s targets aligned with Western foreign policy. If an international court is only legitimate when it prosecutes your adversaries but becomes illegitimate the moment it investigates you or your closest allies, that’s the opposite of justice. It’s a commitment to selective enforcement. Rules for thee. Immunity for me.

English people *really* need to stop indulging in this narcissistic rubbish. Scottish independence is about establishing an accountable and representative democracy for Scotland. That's it. Nobody wants to assume responsibility because they 'hate' a domineering ethnic group.

"These Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures." —Steven Some, chair, New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education

👹✡️RABBI SAYS: Non-Jevvs should be distracted with sports & preoccupied with killing each other so they don't focus on what Jevvs are doing to cause all the problems that are destroying them.

Is it just me or is this demonisation of Iran and the Revolutionary Guard entirely made-up and manufactured? There is no evidence of any attacks by Iran on the UK. They’re not interested in us at all. Absurd, manufactured paranoia. Orwellian.

🎯🎯🎯

As punishment for my factual journalism, I was subjected to political harassment by the Trump administration upon my return from Iran. This Israeli-influenced criminal cartel is clearly threatened by my reporting from Tehran, where I showed the massive crowds of mourners and ferocious public backlash to the assassination of [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei, exposed US and Israeli war crimes against civilians from the ground, and conducted candid interviews with officials, negotiators and influential Iranians. The seizure of my devices was a clear act of intimidation aimed at deterring me and others from doing further critical reporting from Iran, which is likely why my interrogators from CPB demanded to know if I would be returning to Tehran to report any time soon.

They already are.

@TrackAIPAC Gavin Newsom has just made himself unelectable.

Well fuck Gavin Newsom then. It’s not enough to be merely against Trump.

@SatyagrahAlba @tallyanne1 Don’t give the cunt ideas. 😳

@tallyanne1 You could have Melania for President next. 😳

What a shitshow , they are laughing at us…

🇨🇳 Three child rapists were executed in China the same day. No hiding it. China’s Supreme People’s Court approved the death sentences and they were carried out together. All three men had raped children. The court made the cases public with one clear message: no mercy for anyone who harms a child. This is straight from Chinese media: One offender names Zhao ran an illegal education business where he and others abused dozens of underage students. He alone repeatedly raped eight girls, three under 14. Wang and Chen had their own records of targeting the vulnerable over years. The system didn’t drag its feet or offer endless appeals. Justice was swift and final. The CPC has zero tolerance for crimes against children and there’s no room for debate. It is protecting the future of families and society in the most direct way possible. These executions send a strong signal: prey on the innocent and the state will end you. Western media goes on about human rights and how no state should kill. The same voices often watch their own systems cycle predators through soft sentences while victims and communities suffer. China chooses different and prioritises the safety of its children over performative compassion for monsters. The difference between China and the West is clear. In China the focus stays on deterrence and real consequences for the worst offences. Publicising these cases reinforces the bottom line. Harm kids and there will be no quiet deals or second chances. This is not new. Beijing has done it before and will do it again when the crimes demand it. It is rooted in practical reality: a stable society protects its most vulnerable first. When a country refuses to hide its toughness on child abusers and delivers results, is that backward or is it basic responsibility to its people? China has made its choice clear.

Tell us about this very real threat. What form is it taking?

On 13 July, the President of the United States announced that America is henceforth "THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT" and will be "reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped." Iran's Foreign Minister @araghchi replied that the President is absolutely right: whoever provides safe passage should be compensated, and that Iran, the guardian in fact and in law, will set a fairer figure. Washington may read this as sarcasm. It is better understood as a legal instrument because it does two things at once: it accepts the American premise and forecloses the American objection. For years, the United States has claimed to be the principal author and enforcer of the rule that no state may levy tolls on international navigation. It built the Freedom of Navigation Program around that proposition. Only weeks ago, its own officials, along with scholars at the U.S. Naval War College, declared Iranian transit fees flatly unlawful. Yet customary international law is formed through state practice and opinio juris. The ILC's 2018 Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law make clear that public statements made on behalf of a state, especially by the organ responsible for conducting its foreign affairs, may constitute evidence of both. On 13 July, the United States declared, formally and as a matter of right, that a state which secures a strait is entitled, "as a matter of FAIRNESS," to be reimbursed by the ships that pass. That is a legal claim, not a policy preference. A customary rule sustained overwhelmingly by the conduct of specially affected states cannot survive the defection of the most specially affected state of all. At the very least, the state that defects is estopped from invoking against another the rule it has discarded for itself. Allegans contraria non est audiendus. Whatever the law was on 12 July, Washington forfeited its standing to invoke it on the 13th. Furthermore, there is no status in the law of the sea called "guardian." Hormuz lies wholly within the territorial seas of Iran and Oman. The Convention allocates every regulatory competence in the strait, including sea lanes, traffic separation, safety regulation, pollution control, and navigational aids, to the states bordering the strait. User states receive one thing: a right of transit. They may pass, but they may neither legislate, police, nor tax. They cannot turn another state's territorial sea into a tollbooth. Article 26(2) permits the coastal state to levy charges as payment for specific services rendered, without discrimination. Article 43 directs user states and strait states to cooperate in sharing the costs of maintaining the safety of passage. The Turkish Straits and the Strait of Malacca illustrate what lawful cost recovery looks like: itemised, service-linked, proportionate, or, as Foreign Minister Araghchi put it, "fair." Measured against that standard, the American scheme fails on every count. A percentage of cargo value is not payment for a service; it is a tax on trade. And it is enforced through duress, making it not a service charge but a levy extracted under the threat of force, sustained by a narrative of perpetual conflict in which Iran is cast as the villain against whom the United States claims to defend freedom of navigation. Measured against the same standard, Tehran's position fares far better. Iran holds title to the relevant territorial sea, maintains the navigational aids, operates the traffic separation scheme, bears the environmental burden, conducts search and rescue operations, and, on the President's own theory, provides the restraint on which the safety of the Strait has long depended. Mr. Araghchi accepted the premise and drew its only logical and legal conclusion. If the provider of security is entitled to compensation, then that compensation is owed to the coastal state. There is no third rule under which Washington may collect rent from waters that are not its own. "We will be fair" is not a taunt. It is an offer to apply the American-endorsed rule correctly.

Yes. Where are Kurchner and co. forging the deeds for their ‘Riviera resort’ on the Gaza Strip? No wonder they want rid of the .@IntlCrimCourt, they all parasitical bandits.

@TerribleGamble2 @IrishUnity ODFO arsehole.

@IrishUnity Didn't happen. I met him not long before he died,he said, quote "FUCK PALESTINE"

"In my heart I am Palestinian.. I am a defender of the Palestinian people, I respect them and sympathise with them, I support Palestine without fear". - Maradona