Stephen Brown, Mr. Man

5.1K posts

Stephen Brown, Mr. Man banner
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man

Stephen Brown, Mr. Man

@sbrown64

none

San Diego, CA Katılım Ocak 2009
232 Takip Edilen190 Takipçiler
Nick Freitas
Nick Freitas@NickJFreitas·
@hasanthehun Well Hasan, it turns out communists have a long history of suppressing the truth about their regimes. Not everyone gets the same welcome that champagne socialists like yourself do. I notice you never choose to stay in any of the socialist utopias you visit.
English
28
230
5.4K
35.4K
Spencer Pratt
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt·
Karen Bass and Nithya Raman are secretly working together to block me in the primary. Enough with the corrupt, fake politicians. Enough with the games. VOTE PRATT TODAY
English
1.1K
12K
53.3K
866K
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man
@JeffryGerberMD Would AI be helpful in situations like that? More recently, I uploaded an x-ray of my knee and asked AI for a second opinion on a possible knee replacement surgery and got a detailed thorough response even identified of other things the doctors noticed or mentioned. 4x
English
1
0
0
14
Jeffry Gerber, MD
Jeffry Gerber, MD@JeffryGerberMD·
As an independent family doc with over three decades in the game, call me old school but many of my patients (new and old) still enjoy and choose real face-to-face time, and I give it to them. Selection bias, sure! 😀 AI is coming for all of us. Patients should have a real choice between old school connection and AI powered care.
English
14
1
35
21.1K
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man
@JeffryGerberMD 3. So why didn't the doctor in Oak recognize what this was? And why wasn't there some group, at the time, he could show it to that could identify it? Why did I have to go to another doctor? if I put those same symptoms into Google or AI, it identified the issue immediately. 3x
English
0
0
0
6
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man
@mubaraq00476 @Gabbar0099 The way some people go on & on about Israel is wild. Why is no one talking about Slovenia. Bc they're not doing anything. their neighbors aren't lobbing missiles, blowing up buses, acquiring nukes etc. if their neighbors didn't act like aholes, no one would be taking about them.
English
1
1
1
33
mubaraq
mubaraq@mubaraq00476·
Man, the way some people defend Israel no matter what is actually wild. Like bro, we’ve all seen the videos. Bombing kids, destroying hospitals, starving people… and then they cry ‘antisemitism’ when you call it out. Erika can say whatever she wants, but hating what Israel is doing right now isn’t evil, it’s basic human decency. Free Palestine 🇵🇸
English
5
8
115
9.1K
Ben Crump
Ben Crump@AttorneyCrump·
This is what it looks like to stand up when democracy is on the line! Florida Rep. Angie Nixon disrupted a special session to protest gerrymandering, declaring, “This is a violation of the Constitution.” We must continue to protect the power of the people’s vote! ✊🏿 🎥: philsomething/IG
English
754
3.3K
10.3K
480.6K
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man
@Inspirebloom1 @epaleezeldin They have been part of fear mongering and grifting. "We'll all die in 10 years" is not debate. And when their predictions are all wrong you have to question the "verified facts".
English
0
0
0
42
Inspire Bloom
Inspire Bloom@Inspirebloom1·
That’s a pretty heated take. It’s fair to question public figures and hold them accountable, but it’s also important to separate rhetoric from verified facts. People like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Sheldon Whitehouse have all been part of ongoing climate debates that involve complex science, policy, and long-term projections. There’s definitely room for criticism on policies and predictions, but the conversation tends to be more productive when it focuses on evidence and solutions rather than just frustration.
English
1
0
2
1.4K
Lee Zeldin
Lee Zeldin@epaleezeldin·
I told Senator Sheldon WhiteClub today that I won’t be listening to or caring about any of his lessons on morality knowing that he joined an all-white Rhode Island Country Club. I’m also done with the likes of AOC, Al Gore, John Kerry, and the rest of the lying cabal that make stupid climate predictions, plunder tens of billions of tax dollars, enrich their well-connected allies, and are committed to strangulating out of existence entire sectors of our economy. Climate alarmist AOC wants to be taken seriously while also insisting the world is imminently about to end due to climate change (Just under 5 years remain on her nutty Jan 2019 prediction that only 12 years of life are left on Earth). Al Gore is now speaking publicly about his concern with global freezing after decades of grift talking about global warming. “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro,” said Gore in 2006 (There’s still snow on Kilimanjaro year-round). Gore also predicted in 2009 ice-free Arctic summers within 5-7 years. John Kerry warned in 2009 that the Arctic would be ice-free by 2013. These people are dishonest, power-hungry hacks. The GREEN NEW SCAM is DEAD!!!
English
4.4K
26.2K
98.9K
2.1M
Manhattan Mingle
Manhattan Mingle@ManhattanMingle·
🚨In this overedited video, Zohran Mamdani is trying to scam NY’ers into thinking that if a random keffiyeh wearing Mohamed randomly knocks on your door, it’s okay. Except it’s not, it’s extremely alarming. Let’s not a normalize a txxrorist scarf.
English
138
453
3.2K
112.9K
Facts About Texas
Facts About Texas@FactsAboutTexas·
Mineral Wells is decimated 😢
English
103
275
1.7K
144.7K
Jackj
Jackj@Jackjgilz·
@ResisttheMS You bought Twitter and now charge people for it. What about Grok? It was free a year ago. Now you have to pay
English
1
0
0
217
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man@sbrown64·
@tylerblack32 Does he say sardines gave him cold resistance? Or does he say maybe an impact. Those don't sound like the same thing Tyler.
English
0
0
0
71
Tyler Black, MD
Tyler Black, MD@tylerblack32·
It doesn't matter the credentials. If you believe that eating sardines gave you cold resistance your influence on health discussions should be minimal.
Tyler Black, MD tweet media
English
55
8
161
26.2K
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man
Stephen Brown, Mr. Man@sbrown64·
@BNONews With that criteria, he could have just stayed in California but we so know it's just about hating on Republicans and the criteria is just justification.
English
0
0
0
6
BNO News
BNO News@BNONews·
NEW: Cole Allen wrote a manifesto saying he was targeting Trump officials: "I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes."
BNO News tweet mediaBNO News tweet media
English
1.8K
3.3K
21.5K
6M
Steven Quartz PhD
Steven Quartz PhD@StevenQuartz·
@nicknorwitz @PeterAttiaMD A debunking usually engages the content of an article, not just venting that you're upset Attia didn't mention your various degrees. Your post is puerile. And yes I know you'll respond with a stupid gif.
English
7
0
64
3.5K
Nick Norwitz MD PhD
Nick Norwitz MD PhD@nicknorwitz·
Peter Misses the Plot: a Swift Debunking 👇 It’s come to my attention that @PeterAttiaMD has come out with an attempted debunk to The Cholesterol Code documentary and, more broadly, the research on lean mass hyper-responders. I won’t mince words: It’s embarrassing. It’s simultaneously arrogant, deeply misinformed, and, as I read it, a transparent avoidance of the facts at hand. It’s posturing, not insight. And I’m prepared to back that up. First, Peter attempts to discredit the documentary, the research on lean mass hyper-responders, and the Lipid Energy Model, on superficial grounds: credentials and authority. He almost exclusively referring to the work as a product of the Citizen Science Foundation (CSF), i.e., @realDaveFeldman: the 'uncredentialed' outsider. He conspicuously avoids discussing the broader teams involved, many of whom carry credentials that would easily meet the standards typically valued in more traditional, credential-focused settings (and exceed his own). Even setting aside myself, an MD-PhD, there is: Dr. Adrian Soto-Mota, MD-PhD, ith the Lundquist team, there are others who have co-authored work in this space, including Anatol Kontush, Ronald Krauss, William Cromwell, and, notably, Peter’s own former head of research, Bob Kaplan. Go figure. Might have been a fact fact for Peter to include: "My former head of research was a coauthor on the Lipid Energy Model paper I'm inadequately trying to debunk." And that’s the short list. I’ll also point out that when I was writing an editorial on lean mass hyper-responders, I reached out to Peter, and he declined to contribute, citing that it was not his area of expertise. He instead referred me to Ronald Krauss at “the expert,” who has now collaborated with us on a couple of projects. So even at a superficial level, what we’re seeing here is avoidance, posturing, and frank hypocrisy. Peter further attempts to cast doubt on lean mass hyper-responders by questioning the existence of the phenotype, which is, frankly, comical. It exists. It is defined by three clear cut points, and people meeting those criteria unquestionably exist. It is also a dynamic and reproducible phenomenon, as demonstrated by multiple experiments, case series, and even meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that we have published. Peter forgot to talk about those data. No surprise there. Peter also demonstrates a misunderstanding of the Lipid Energy Model, for example by incorrectly suggesting a contradiction between the model and the low triglycerides observed in lean mass hyper-responders. And, more broadly, he reveals a lack of familiarity with the practical realities and constraints of clinical study design. If we are going to lean on authority, then it is fair to ask about experience. To my knowledge, Peter has not conducted clinical trials, and frankly, that gap shows here. At a deeper level, I don’t think Peter understands this physiology or this domain. And behavior like this, particularly when presented under the banner of scientific critique, is exactly the kind of thing that fuels “broader distrust in institutions and experts.” This is a textbook case of the pot calling the kettle black. I could go on, but I think the core point is clear. If further discourse is needed, Peter and his colleagues, including Tom Dayspring, have had ample opportunity to engage, collaborate, and discuss these ideas directly. If they choose not to, that speaks for itself. In the meantime, we’re not going anywhere. And no amount of pedantic posturing is going to change the trajectory of the data. Oh, and two more things… i. For those tempted to fall back on the overly simplistic take that “they’re saying high LDL is good” and “fear mongering about pharma,” or similar caricatures, you’ve entirely missed the plot. And, I have something coming this week. Again, if you interpret it as a pivot, you’ve missed the point entirely, as Peter has. ii. Finally, Peter’s central criticism seems to be that the documentary and our research suggest that even very high LDL cholesterol may not always indicate cardiovascular risk. Well, yes. The alternative is to argue that in all circumstances, at all times, very high LDL necessarily drives cardiovascular disease. This isn’t about discrediting, with a blanket statement, any role of ApoB or LDL in cardiovascular disease. This is about asking important questions at the frontier of science, because the status quo has been wholly inadequate in addressing the problem at hand. That's obvious. At least to some extent, we have been barking up the wrong tree. Anyone with a modicum of perspective can see that. And anyone with genuine curiosity would be willing to engage with the nuance, rather than lecture, avoid, and misrepresent, as Peter is doing here. Lastly: See the Cholesterol Code Documentary. It's on Amazon. And judge for yourself.
Nick Norwitz MD PhD tweet media
English
93
106
696
87.5K