John Mckay

@Chirleeee @my3rd_alt @LucyLiuya3f @jvceryskanej Notice how he’s pivoted from “there’s nothing wrong with owning those books” to “they were probably planted by the maid” lol

@my3rd_alt @LucyLiuya3f @schoopydobloop @jvceryskanej Absolutely not. You truly believe that the maid who worked there for years without issue, was somehow planting evidence in his locked wardrobe? You need serious help

michael jackson defenders truly need to be studied...

@Nestarichierich @mtracey lol why is it when Michael Jackson fans done have a good answer they just resort to childish insults?

@schoopydobloop @mtracey You’re too stupid! First of all, it’s the Chandlers who were pushing for the settlement. Second of all, you’re an idiot!

If anyone popping off "discourse" about Michael Jackson suspiciously omits that he was ACQUITTED after years of intense investigation and an incredibly exhaustive trial, by a jury pool selected from a relatively conservative area, you can pretty much just ignore their Discoursing

@Nestarichierich @mtracey You think a prolific paedophile like Michael Jackson was worried about the legality of the deal lol? You’re absurd.

@schoopydobloop @mtracey Yes you want me to understand that MJ paid the Chandlers not to testify in a criminal court, though that’s illegal and not necessary for them to get paid since a civil settlement was being paid anyway. Your theory is absurd and supported by zero fact.

@Nestarichierich @mtracey Ok, I’ve explained to you as clearly as I can what happened but if you refuse to see the wood for the trees that’s on you, have a good day

@schoopydobloop @mtracey You’re beyond stupid! The settlement was for the civil trial, not the criminal one. He was being sued in civil court while a criminal investigation was ongoing. He settled the civil case but the criminal one went on. You just don’t understand the first thing about any of this.

@Nestarichierich @mtracey Except you can It might be illegal in theory, but in practice there’s nothing stopping two parties privately making a shady agreement, which is what happened here He gave them $20 million, they agreed to not cooperate

@schoopydobloop @mtracey Yeah you’re too stupid for this convo. You can’t pay people not to cooperate in a criminal investigation. That’s illegal. There was no trial because there was no evidence.

@Nestarichierich @mtracey That’s what I’m saying, there was no trial in 1993 because he paid the Chandler money not to cooperate in one

@schoopydobloop @mtracey He wasn’t acquitted in 93 because there never even was a trial, dumb ass! There couldn’t be an indictment because there was no evidence. The settlement didn’t prevent the Chandlers from cooperating in a criminal investigation, but they chose not to because they only wanted $.

@MarianaR @ANNASARAKI @mtracey I've noticed a trend here where Michael Jackson fans just result to insults when they don't have a good response to what you've said (usually because there isn't one) so they lash out instead

@ANNASARAKI @schoopydobloop @mtracey He can't because he, like others, is a pathetic ignoramus who gets his information from trashy press How many times do we have to repeat the same thing for these people to understand?

@my3rd_alt @LucyLiuya3f @jvceryskanej If someone gave me that as a "gift" I'd chuck it right in the bin

@LucyLiuya3f @schoopydobloop @jvceryskanej But that doesn't mean he viewed it as CP when a fan gifted it to him in the early 80s.

@sisteract4encom @DillyJ92 @Trutown @mtracey Absense of evidence isn’t evidence of absence, just because his fingerprints weren’t found on the books doesn’t mean he never opened them. Fingerprint analysis isn’t infallible, and those books had been sitting for over a decade before they were checked.

@schoopydobloop @DillyJ92 @Trutown @mtracey there's no context that would have made them illegal and (as we established) the books were gifted to Michael and he never so much as opened them. The FBI seized 16 hard drives from his home and found nothing incriminating

@DillyJ92 @sisteract4encom @Trutown @mtracey They were produced by NAMBLA and were specifically designed to skirt around the law

@schoopydobloop @sisteract4encom @Trutown @mtracey There was no books related to NAMBLA. Books found was legal art books that are legal

@Obi887962668520 @mtracey I’m all for applying the same criticism to Elvis and The Beatles

@schoopydobloop @mtracey Sit down hater. Imagine if energy towards Michael was done to others like Elvis, Beatles etc🤔. Beatles had sexcapades involving underage girls. Michael hate is nothing to do with allegations. It's do with him not bendiny knee to establishment and wanting ownership of music.

@DillyJ92 @sisteract4encom @Trutown @mtracey I'm saying it raises some very obvious questions which you are clearly wilfully ignoring What's your opinion on the NAMBLA books which were in with his porn collection?

@schoopydobloop @sisteract4encom @Trutown @mtracey So let me get this straight, he’s not allowed to be an innocent person, have clean image because he has a porn collection. LOL Nah, this is when the internet is too much for the day. Mate, you’ve got some issues.

@DillyJ92 @sisteract4encom @Trutown @mtracey It’s an issue when you advertise yourself as this super innocent “Peter Pan” type character Kind of contradicts that whole narrative

@schoopydobloop @sisteract4encom @Trutown @mtracey lol so having porn collection is now a issue 😂😂😂😂 it’s like your do desperate for him to have been guilty

@sisteract4encom @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey which completely contradicts his "oh I'm so innocent, I'm Peter Pan" persona, and frankly just raises more questions

@schoopydobloop @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey tbh I think the most shocking fact to come out of the trial was that MJ was a red blooded american male who read playboy

@sisteract4encom @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey He had one hell of a porn collection for someone obsessed with childhood, innocence and purity

@schoopydobloop @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey he had a pretty well documented obsession with childhood/innocence/purity in no small part due to being raised a jehovah's witness, i can't say why but it seems like part of that, he had pics of kids and babies and angels all over neverland

@sisteract4encom @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey Well that’s not true at all, in 2003 he already had 3 kids and was still having the sleepovers with boys

@schoopydobloop @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey He kept doing it until he had kids of his own (and by all accounts he was a fantastic father). Is it normal or healthy to recruit random kids and their families to help you live out your lost childhood? no not really, but its very different from being a child predator

@sisteract4encom @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey But why keep a book like that?

@schoopydobloop @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey The books gifted to him by someone (much like with hundreds of other books in his collection) This is Micheal Jackson people and hand him stuff constantly. As per the 2005 trial his fingerprints (and signature on one) were found on the cover but not inside, he never read them.

@sisteract4encom @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey The problem with this is he kept doing it Ten years later he was still having little boys stay at his house and sleep in his bed

@schoopydobloop @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey By the time the reality of what this was doing to his reputation became clear, he did pretty much what you would expect and collapsed into painkiller addition and left his legal team completely directionless.

@sisteract4encom @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey Why did he have NAMBLA books in with his porn collection?

@schoopydobloop @Trutown @DillyJ92 @mtracey Which is not to say the settlement didn't make him look guilty and leave him open to further accusations. He was extremely stupid. Jackson did not see how this was any different from the litany of paternity claims and other extortion attempts he dealt with near constantly

@BuysErik @mtracey I’ve seen that before, it’s incredibly misleading and misses out a lot (I suspect intentionally)

@schoopydobloop @mtracey This is a clarifying thread: x.com/i/status/19335…