Science Denier

903 posts

Science Denier

Science Denier

@science_denier

What has two thumbs and denies science? This guy.

Katılım Ekim 2017
393 Takip Edilen29 Takipçiler
THE MMA GURU
THE MMA GURU@THATBOYMMAGURU·
GREAT SCRAP From Ian Garry and Belal Muhammad Ian Garry clearly won the first & the third round, the second round is close. Give Ian Garry the title shot against Makhachev for sure #UFCQatar ALL TITLE ELIMINATION BOUTS SHOULD BE FIVE ROUNDS! I FEEL ROBBED How was Belal Champ?
English
108
27
2.7K
135.3K
LowKeyLurkin
LowKeyLurkin@LeverageOn·
@PokerTone @DougPolkVids please don’t give this moron a platform or attention lol, embarrassing behavior, even if mariano was slightly out of line (wasn’t imo) he handled himself respectfully and calmly like a professional and palma handled himself like a butthurt child, classic mtt mizreg
English
3
0
8
845
Antonio
Antonio@PokerTone·
Hey @DougPolkVids pleaseeeeee do a breakdown of the Nicky P and Mariano segment lol
English
15
1
97
21.9K
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@CourtvfanfromOr @JFGariepy Personally I don't believe she really thought it was because a fallen tree, and if she thought that she would want to check to see if the house was damaged, but I give you credit for making some fair counter points. We'll have to wait and see what unfolds, if anything.
English
1
0
0
20
Glenn Thomas
Glenn Thomas@CourtvfanfromOr·
@science_denier @JFGariepy It was an hour and a half after it happened, not an hour. Even if Dan wasn't murdered, she still would've driven that same route at the same time. Jeff confirms it was her normal route whenever she was in the area. She didn't know a murder had taken place that day. (See Below)
Glenn Thomas tweet media
English
1
0
0
19
Science Denier retweetledi
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
💔The top 5 toxic behaviors that females do during a separation.💔 I think it's important we talk about those things because there are guys out there constantly being wrecked emotionally and there are very few guides that exist to sort all of this out, thus leading people to feel isolated; they falsely think their situation is unique. In my experience, Homo Sapiens Femalus Separatus is a mode of the human species that is widespread. You'll see these tactics happening in pretty much every separation in some form or another. 1. Betray-then-demand. The female will first commit an unforgivable act of betrayal - something like cheating, stealing, withholding or hiding the kids, renaming the kids - and then she will not only act like that betrayal deserves no reparation or apology, she will demand that you care about HER mental torment as she suffers from the mental distress resulting from HER own dishonest action. Optimal response: "Get fucked, bitch." Limit emotional care until she fixes her mistake. Adopt the perspective that she has created a situation of extortion; she has violated one of your rights and she is now demanding the continuation of your obligations towards her, dangling the possibility of the continuation of the violation of your rights in front of your face. There can be no continued obligations without respect of rights. There can be no love under extortion. Opening yourself to this kind of emotional blackmail will ruin your heart, because she will continue escalating the violations and demand more and more from you without giving back. A female on the loose must be repairing her mistake before you ever give a shit again. Be creative in the ways you tell her to go fuck herself in order to throw them off. 2. "I didn't mean it that way." The separating female will commit serious slights and violations of the rules of the couple while also trying to absolve herself of responsibility by claiming that, though she has committed the violation, she did not INTEND to commit the violation. "It's not what you think." "I hid the kids from you and lied to you but I really WANT you to be involved in the kids' life." "I didn't KNOW it would turn that way." "I planted that sword in your chest but I didn't WANT you to die." Optimal response: Impose a sense of moral judgment based purely in actions and not intentions. It doesn't matter if she doesn't know, doesn't think, doesn't intend, doesn't whatever she's claiming. All that matters is what she's DOING; if it acts like Femalus Separatus, then it most certainly is. This goes both for the direction of good and bad actions. Corrections are only valuable once accomplished, not the mere promise of them. 3. "If you cared more, perhaps I could undo my betrayal." Here, the separating female is trying to extort emotional care without committing herself to the path of reparation of the couple. She is so greedy she wants to drain some more care and attention while you, the cuckhold of this arrangement, get nothing. She wants love on the way out. But in my experience, a woman on the way out is not going to be swayed by love. All that makes them return is a pillar of complete, righteous, masculine rejection. Optimal response: "I do not provide emotional care or financial support under extortion." Do not let her get away with even the slightest immoral act toward you. Down the line, she will respect you more if she is ever to return. 4. The post-betrayal hypothetical. Homo Sapiens Femalus Separatus will engage in hypotheticals in which she irremediably violates your rights and then expect you to come up with a loving response toward them. It takes the form of "Suppose I was to [mess your life up significantly in some deeply immoral way], and this led us to split, would you commit not to go sleep with that girl I hate?" The fact that this tactic exists at all is a testament to the wicked sense of entitlement of females in general. As I've often written: they don't just want to wreck your life, they want to neuter you permanently. That's because females do not have the level of cognition required to understand that once they have broken the relationship, they have lost any control over their mate. Optimal response: "If you break our relationship, I can do whatever I want, including fuck a million girls you hate, and in fact I'll do it." 5. The post-betrayal justification. Here, the female tries to reconcile her cognitive dissonance over the fact that she has psychopathically executed a betrayal program against you, but she doesn't like to feel THAT evil. Therefore she will seek, in YOUR REACTION TO HER BETRAYAL, a justification for why she had to betray you. This generally takes the form of "Originally, when I [messed your life up significantly in some deeply immoral way], I didn't intend to break up with you, but now that I have seen how you reacted, I think it's better we part ways." Optimal response: Do not respond. Ignore. She is trying to insert poisonous thoughts of regret while constructing a narrative of innocence for herself. In the end, kindness will never help you fix a female that has decided she wants to separate from you. What the Optimal Responses above allow is 1. To protect yourself emotionally from the mental instability and wickedness of Femalus Separatus. 2. In the event that she was to come back, ensure that she will have gained respect for your upright stance in the process and that she will think twice before doing it again. In more general terms, understand that Femalus Separatus is a dangerous organism to even interact with at a distance. Never look at them in the eyes, never listen to a single word of what they say.
English
29
25
254
20.3K
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@CourtvfanfromOr @JFGariepy So the house that she used to live in, that her kids stayed at the night before, was surrounded by cop cars, and she didn't get out of her car to see what had happened? Instead she went to pick up some Bullet Bourbon and hang out with her friends...
English
0
0
0
18
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@CourtvfanfromOr @JFGariepy I don't think those points mean much. She could easily say those things to not be suspected. The murder was for her. She told Lacosse her brother was going to hire a hitman. And she drove up to the crime scene tape an hour after he was shot, then turned around and drove away?
English
2
0
0
50
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@JFGariepy We're still waiting to hear if Wendi Adelson, the x wife will be indicted. Super interesting trials thus far and the state prosecutors have been excellent.
English
2
0
1
339
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@JFGariepy JF, I'd love to hear your take on the Adelson murder for hire case in Florida. After a nasty divorce, a family conspired to have the x husband killed in order to get full custody of the kids. The hitmen, middleman, and two family members have already been convicted.
English
1
0
0
141
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@JFGariepy Where do you post your videos these days? No longer on odysee it seems...
English
1
0
0
214
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬
The mistreatment of Nick Fuentes by Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson is another form of Cancel Culture.
English
82
248
2.2K
48.4K
Robbi Jade Lew
Robbi Jade Lew@RobbiJadeLew·
One hand can change your life! 😱 I keep thinking about this hand 🤯 On DAY 1 of the @WSOP Main Event @LeoMargets put a player all in with only 15k chips behind her with a (semi-bluff-ish?) move against DeSantis who had her beat, putting him in for his tournament life… Had he called, she would have had only 15k behind on her FIRST day (which may have changed the trajectory of her tournament course). How exhilarating that she’s at the 2025 Main Event Final Table instead… already changing history! 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼 Speaks volumes on the volatility of poker, being able to read your opponent’s vulnerabilities, and being unafraid to make a bold move (at any stage of the tournament) @PokerGO @PokerNews @pokerorg @Winamax
English
67
31
2.3K
261.3K
Science Denier retweetledi
Scott Brown | USAHouses.com 🇺🇸
@WSOP @WilliamKassouf @SpaceyFCB What a hero to poker Kenny is. Can you imagine having to hear that Willie K Talk All Day? No way! The flop of the year. Turns out he got a bad beat down. He won’t be part of a full house anymore because he has to go straight home after they flushed him down the river.
English
1
1
4
944
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@Home_of_Fight The Stipe fight should have never been a title defense. That was an exhibition fight.
English
0
0
0
24
Home of Fight
Home of Fight@Home_of_Fight·
🚨👀Ariel Helwani reveals new details on UFC and Jon Jones negotiations regarding Tom Aspinall fight: - The UFC got Jon Jones the money he’s been asking for and he said yes but later changed his mind and said no. - UFC still tried to make this fight happen but couldn’t get Jon Jones interested. - Jon Jones is interested in fighting, just not against Tom Aspinall specifically (via. @arielhelwani)▫️
Home of Fight tweet media
English
285
136
5.5K
770.1K
Science Denier
Science Denier@science_denier·
@JonnyBones Shout out to those who never, not once believed that Jon would fight Tom, despite Dana promising it 100%...
English
0
0
0
14
Jonny Meat
Jonny Meat@JonnyBones·
You clowns thinking, Francis would be that much easier because of the ground game. Tom has no ground game either. In English black belt is like getting a participation ribbon.
English
2.2K
394
12.1K
1.7M
Science Denier retweetledi
Shawn Farash
Shawn Farash@Shawn_Farash·
THE 2020 ELECTION WAS STOLEN
English
495
3.9K
18.2K
0
Fleccas 🇺🇸
Fleccas 🇺🇸@fleccas·
MUPPETRY: LeBron wears a mask while driving a convertible by himself.
English
1.1K
599
5.4K
0
Science Denier retweetledi
Scott Adams
Scott Adams@ScottAdamsSays·
Did a Democratic mayor just list five CNN-inspired Trump hoaxes (and nothing else) as reasons Trump must be replaced?
English
393
1.8K
7.4K
0