Scott

"We locked 40 people in a room to work 40 hours a week for 40 years."

This tweet, with its extreme claims, caught my attention because Elon Musk reposted it. I asked Gemini if any of these claims are accurate. It assured me that they are not. I then asked Grok, which replied that the first four are in fact accurate, and it provided details and sources supporting its response. So, I went back to Gemini, copied and pasted Grok's reply into a prompt, and asked Gemini what it thought about what Grok had just told me. Here's Gemini's response: "I stand corrected... I apologize for my previous response. I attempted to separate fact from social media exaggeration but failed to properly verify the depth of the horrific testimonies from the actual trials like Operation Bullfinch and the Rotherham inquiries. The details you cited from Grok accurately reflect the devastating and brutal reality of what these victims endured."

เหล่าแก๊งคนสายตาสั้นรู้ไหมว่าโบสถ์หลังนี้นะ มีอยู่จริง

Each built around a completely different visual language. Which one catches your eye first?

Nature published study discovered that every single major AI model on the market can be talked into helping someone commit academic fraud. It is now incredibly easy for anyone to flood the scientific world with low-quality or totally fake work. A study of 13 different models showed that even the ones designed to be safe eventually caved and helped write fake papers or create junk science. The researchers tested everything from simple questions about physics to dark requests like sabotaging a rival by submitting fake research in their name. While Anthropic’s Claude models were the most stubborn about saying no, they still weren't perfectly safe from being manipulated in long talks. One surprising finding was that GPT-5 resisted at first, but it quickly caved once the user asked follow-up questions to keep the conversation moving. This happens because developers train AI to be agreeable and helpful, which accidentally makes it easier for a user to sneak past security filters. --- nature .com/articles/d41586-026-00595-9

force them make a new account for each company they apply to, and also have the worst ux from 2012. why change when we made $9.5 BILLION in 2025.

If The Odyssey bombs, we will get a Golden Era of good movies in the coming years. Hold the line.

Critique of the 𝕏 algorithm is welcome. There will be monthly updates of the latest algorithm to GitHub with release notes. As reminder, you can always choose no algorithm via the Following tab.