The Screen In Transit

come join us in lagos next week Sunday. it's a maldoror month. it's free! get your tickets below!

we're back in Lagos! we are pleased to announce our screening happening next week, and we're showing two films by Sarah Maldoror: Monangambé & Sambizanga. get a free ticket below in the comments!

we are pleased to announce our abuja screening happening next week! we're showing two films by Sarah Maldoror: Monangambé & Sambizanga. get a free ticket below in the comments!

link is also in our bio!

in february 2026, we showed two films touching on the theme of love's many faces and societal pressures in African society. @ivanvespasian, writes about the films and the thematic focus for the month. link is below to read and subscribe. open.substack.com/pub/thescreeni…

we are pleased to announce our lagos screening happening next week! we're showing two films Traces of The Sun by Rete Poki & Muna Moto! get a free ticket below! useketro.com/lagoss-februar…

link is also in our bio!

in January 2026, we showed three films touching on the theme of Gender Identity, Roles and Representation on the African continent. writer, @ivanvespasian, writes about the films and the thematic focus for the month. link is below to read and subscribe. open.substack.com/pub/thescreeni…

We are pleased to announce the screening of the following films in Lagos: A Body In Metaphor by @amandamadumere, Girl-Boy by Ajay Abalaka & Taafé Fanga by Adama Drabo RSVP using the @useketro link below: useketro.com/lagoss-january…

We are pleased to announce, in partnerhip with The Heart Heartist Centre, Abuja, the screening of the following films: A Body In Metaphor by @amandamadumere, Girl-Boy by Ajay Abalaka & Taafé Fanga by Adama Drabo RSVP using the @useketro link in our bio, as seating is limited.

we showed jenin, jenin as part of @screenintransit Palestine Cinema Days Around the World in November. true anguish. rest gently.

it was our pleasure to show it and I'm glad the experience was a great one! a wonderful way to close the year for @screenintransit

The Balfour Declaration was issued on 2 November 1917. In the memorable words of Arthur Koestler, Balfour’s declaration was “one the most improbable political documents of all time,” in which “one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third.” As is well known, the Balfour Declaration was categorically rejected by the Palestinians. That they would not look kindly upon their intended dispossession by the Zionist movement was considered so self-evident that General Edmund Allenby, who that same day had finally seized Gaza from the Ottomans on the third attempt, and was preparing to make his way to Jerusalem, issued a decree prohibiting its publication in Palestine. Less well known is that the Balfour Declaration hardly met with widespread euphoria among its intended beneficiaries, the Jews of Europe. Below is an excerpt from a memo presented to the British cabinet by Edwin Samuel Montagu in August 1917, as the Balfour Declaration was being drafted. Montagu’s memorandum, entitled “On the Anti-Semitism of the Present [British] Government”, is significant because Montagu was at the time the only Jewish member of the British cabinet, and in that capacity also the Balfour Declaration’s fiercest opponent. In his words: Zionism has always seemed to me to be a mischievous political creed, untenable by any patriotic citizen of the United Kingdom. If a Jewish Englishman sets his eyes on The Mount of Olives and longs for the day when he will shake British soil from his shoes and go back to agricultural pursuits in Palestine, he has always seemed to me to have acknowledged aims inconsistent with British citizenship and to have admitted that he is unfit for a share in public life in Great Britain, or to be treated as an Englishman. I have always understood that those who indulged in this creed were largely animated by the restrictions upon and refusal of liberty to Jews in Russia. But at the very time when these Jews have been acknowledged as Jewish Russians and given all liberties, it seems to be inconceivable that Zionism should be officially recognised by the British Government, and that Mr. Balfour should be authorized to say that Palestine was to be reconstituted as the “national home of the Jewish people”. I do not know what this involves, but I assume that it means that Mahommedans and Christians are to make way for the Jews and that the Jews should be put in all positions of preference and should be peculiarly associated with Palestine in the same way that England is with the English or France with the French, that Turks and other Mahommedans in Palestine will be regarded as foreigners, just in the same way as Jews will hereafter be treated as foreigners in every country but Palestine. Perhaps also citizenship must be granted only as a result of a religious test. I lay down with emphasis four principles: 1. I assert that there is not a Jewish nation. The members of my family, for instance, who have been in this country for generations, have no sort or kind of community of view or of desire with any Jewish family in any other country beyond the fact that they profess to a greater or less degree the same religion. It is no more true to say that a Jewish Englishman and a Jewish Moor are of the same nation than it is to say that a Christian Englishman and a Christian Frenchman are of the same nation: of the same race, perhaps, traced back through the centuries - through centuries of the history of a peculiarly adaptable race. The Prime Minister and M. Briand are, I suppose, related through the ages, one as a Welshman and the other as a Breton, but they certainly do not belong to the same nation. 2. When the Jews are told that Palestine is their national home, every country will immediately desire to get rid of its Jewish citizens, and you will find a population in Palestine driving out its present inhabitants, taking all the best in the country, drawn from all quarters of the globe, speaking every language on the face of the earth, and incapable of communicating with one another except by means of an interpreter. I have always understood that this was the consequence of the building of the Tower of Babel, if ever it was built, and I certainly do not dissent from the view, commonly held, as I have always understood, by the Jews before Zionism was invented, that to bring the Jews back to form a nation in the country from which they were dispersed would require Divine leadership. I have never heard it suggested, even by their most fervent admirers, that either Mr. Balfour or Lord Rothschild would prove to be the Messiah. I claim that the lives that British Jews have led, that the aims that they have had before them, that the part that they have played in our public life and our public institutions, have entitled them to be regarded, not as British Jews, but as Jewish Britons. I would willingly disfranchise every Zionist. I would be almost tempted to proscribe the Zionist organisation as illegal and against the national interest. But I would ask of a British Government sufficient tolerance to refuse a conclusion which makes aliens and foreigners by implication, if not at once by law, of all their Jewish fellow-citizens. 3. I deny that Palestine is today associated with the Jews or properly to be regarded as a fit place for them to live in. The Ten Commandments were delivered to the Jews on Sinai. It is quite true that Palestine plays a large part in Jewish history, but so it does in modern Mahommendan history, and, after the time of the Jews, surely it plays a larger part than any other country in Christian history. The Temple may have been in Palestine, but so was the Sermon on the Mount and the Crucifixion. I would not deny to Jews in Palestine equal rights to colonisation with those who profess other religions, but a religious test of citizenship seems to me to be the only admitted by those who take a bigoted and narrow view of one particular epoch of the history of Palestine, and claim for the Jews a position to which they are not entitled. If my memory serves me right, there are three times as many Jews in the world as could possible get into Palestine if you drove out all the population that remains there now. So that only one-third will get back at the most, and what will happen to the remainder? 4. I can easily understand the editors of the Morning Post and of the New Witness being Zionists, and I am not in the least surprised that the non-Jews of England may welcome this policy. I have always recognised the unpopularity, much greater than some people think, of my community. We have obtained a far greater share of this country’s goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach on the whole maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships and intolerant in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us. But just as there is no community of thought and mode of life among Christian Englishmen, so there is not among Jewish Englishmen. More and more we are educated in public schools and at the Universities, and take our part in the politics, in the Army, in the Civil Service, of our country. And I am glad to think that the prejudices against inter-marriage are breaking down. But when the Jew has a national home, surely it follows that the impetus to deprive us of the rights of British citizenship must be enormously increased. Palestine will become the world’s Ghetto. Why should the Russian give the Jew equal rights? His national home is Palestine. Why does Lord Rothschild attach so much importance to the difference between British and foreign Jews? All Jews will be foreign Jews, inhabitants of the great country of Palestine. I do not know how the fortunate third will be chosen, but the Jew will have the choice, whatever country he belongs to, whatever country he loves, whatever country he regards himself as an integral part of, between going to live with people who are foreigners to him, but to whom his Christian fellow-countrymen have told him he shall belong, and of remaining as an unwelcome guest in the country that he thought he belonged to ... I would say to Lord Rothschild that the Government will be prepared to do everything in their power to obtain for Jews in Palestine complete liberty of settlement and life on an equality with the inhabitants of that country who profess other religious beliefs. I would ask that the Government should go no further. E.S.M. 23 August 1917

Join us on Sunday, November 2nd for our free Palestinian Cinema Days Around the World screening, organised around the world by @PalFilmLab, providing a platform for humanising Palestinian voices and freeing their art from world censorship. RSVP through the link in our bio!

Showing on our Lagos screens on the 25th of October are the films: The Weight of Small Things, Sands of Time and This Is Not a Burial, It's a Resurrection. RSVP by getting a ticket at the link in our bio! See you! Curated by @amandamadumere @Retepoki @zainab_twt & @heyifeoluwa

We're so sorry guys, we've had to postpone our Sunday screening. A new date will be communicated soon enough. Thank you for all the support!

Hello everyone, due to some unforeseen circumstances, we've had to postpone Sunday's screening. We hope to see you all soon. A new date will be communicated in due course. Apologies to everyone hoping to see this wonderful films this weekend 🙏🏿

Showing on our Lagos screens on the 27th of July are the films: The Weight of Small Things, Sands of Time and This Is Not a Burial, It's a Resurrection. RSVP by getting a ticket at the link in our bio! See you soon! Curated by @amandamadumere @Retepoki @zainab_twt & @heyifeoluwa