Jay

15.3K posts

Jay banner
Jay

Jay

@sebuchingu

she/they | fandom hag | mainly SVT, Sowon/Yerin/Yuju/VIVIZ | I tweet in Eng/Fil/Taglish | 時々日本語でツイートする

Katılım Haziran 2020
311 Takip Edilen573 Takipçiler
Jay
Jay@sebuchingu·
My only take on the picheolin discourse:
Jay tweet media
English
0
0
0
26
Jay
Jay@sebuchingu·
@thinkinboutnonu no fr because nung kinaladkad ako ni ate sa concert ng faves niya sa JP, namatay ako sa inggit because we got top tier prod (moving stage, inclining LED stage, moving LED screens, etc.) for less than 4kPHP. Pledis could do waaaaay more with the prices they're charging -_-
English
1
0
1
31
Jay retweetledi
냐옹
냐옹@luvheb·
부르셨나요
한국어
13
3.5K
18.5K
1.7M
Jay retweetledi
svtgf
svtgf@6FRD17·
check on ur caratbuddy friends they're not okay
svtgf tweet media
English
1
143
562
6.2K
Jay
Jay@sebuchingu·
You deserve what you tolerate 🤷‍♀️ this was a fanmeet where winning a slot was based on chance. OP was willing to buy their way through (and 5 digits at that), so dun pa lang ekis na ako.
jadey (saw enha & svt, still hoping to see bts) 🤍@yourjadeyyy_

I saw this sa isang facebook page while scrolling, ang masasabi ko lang ay may mga tao pa rin talaga na gahaman kahit sa kapwa fan mo pa dahil alam mo na gusto nilang makita idol nila. Imagine 'yung 50k na ginastos sa'yo te tapos wala man lang thank you 😭😭😭

English
0
0
4
87
Jay
Jay@sebuchingu·
THEY'RE FREE 🥹 and I hope whatever energy BPM gave their artists would return to them tenfold~
GFSquad@GFS_backup

[NEWS] 260408 - VIVIZ have terminated their exclusive contract with Big Planet Made in March On the 8th, VIVIZ legal representative from Shinwon Law Firm announced via an official press release that their contracts have been terminated. According to the statement, the members notified the agency of termination due to breach of settlement payment obligations, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust. The contracts were legally terminated as of March 4, 2026, and are no longer valid. Full Official Statement: “Hello, this is attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, legal representative for Eunha, SinB, and Umji of VIVIZ (hereinafter “the artists”). We are delivering the artists’ official position regarding the termination of their exclusive contracts. The artists notified their agency, Big Planet Made Entertainment, of contract termination due to violations of settlement payment obligations, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust. The contracts were lawfully terminated as of March 4, 2026. The agency delayed the final settlement payment around November 2025 and has not made any further payments since. Despite multiple inquiries, the agency only responded vaguely that payment would be made “soon,” but has not followed through. In January 2026, the agency unilaterally informed the artists of the cancellation of their upcoming album (EP06). Additionally, all domestic and overseas fan meetings scheduled for the first half of the year were canceled. The agency was even unable to cover basic on-site expenses, leading to situations where a manager had to use personal funds. While the artists were willing to endure delays in their own payments, they could not bear seeing those around them suffer financial harm as activities continued. Ultimately, the artists concluded that the agency had completely lost the fundamental will and ability to support their careers, failed to take responsibility for payments, and irreparably broke the trust necessary to maintain the contract. With heavy hearts, the artists notified the agency of contract termination. Although they were no longer contractually obligated to participate in scheduled activities after March 4, the artists completed all schedules through the end of March out of responsibility to their fans. As all activities have now concluded, they are only now sharing this statement. The artists sincerely thank their fans for their unwavering support and hope to continue together as one team in the future. They ask for your continued support. Thank you." 🔗naver.me/5fdn4VdJ #GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official

English
0
0
0
58
Jay
Jay@sebuchingu·
Love you talaga sebongs 🥹 thank you for staying together. I hope one day, if/when things get better, makita ko ulit kayo.
English
0
0
0
25
Jay retweetledi
mahal nyong sol 🇵🇭🏳️‍🌈 𝚿 (she/they)
PUV people have been rallying for weeks and somehow it’s THIS tonta that the LTFRB would rather listen to 🙄🙄
James Deakin@TransportGuy

Yesterday I wrote an open letter on behalf of the motoring public to the LTFRB and MMDA about community carpooling. Today, we were formally invited to the table. Credit to MMDA chairman Artes for reaching out and being proactive. This is how it should be. Unfortunately, I can’t make it in person due to a death in the family, but I have submitted a formal position paper, and I want you to know exactly what it says. Here is the short version. The new carpooling guidelines being drafted today are a good start. Company shuttles, non-profit, streamlined permits. I support it. But it only helps people who work for companies large enough to organize one. That leaves out a lot of Filipinos. What we are pushing for is the community version. You register once, in person, with your subdivision HOA or your employer, just to make sure you are indeed part of that community. After that, you can use the app and match only with verified neighbors or colleagues going the same direction. The platform charges nothing. No permits. No government registration. Just two people deciding not to take two cars. This is already legal. Former LTFRB Chairman Martin Delgra said so on record. Community carpooling with no platform fees falls outside LTFRB jurisdiction. That was true then. It’s still true now. What’s been missing is a public endorsement that gives communities the confidence to build without fear of being shut down the way Wunder was. Three things I’m formally asking for in the position paper: One. Include community-based carpooling in the guidelines being written tomorrow. Two. Issue a public statement confirming it is legal and encouraged. Three. Recognize that the company shuttle model and the neighborhood carpool model serve different people. They can coexist. They should coexist. The full position paper is on record. If you want to see this happen, share this post. The more people behind this, the harder it is to ignore.

English
6
202
984
31.4K