Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Selenevea
3.9K posts
Selenevea
@selenevea
贩卖日落与深夜的心事 只取悦自己，无关他人 OOTD | 记录瞬间 | 勿扰模式
Los Angeles, CA Katılım Ekim 2023
725 Takip Edilen10.4K Takipçiler
Selenevea retweetledi
我很赞同，这个系统的创作者收益的部分，严重缺乏透明度，而且规则说变就变，就像小孩子过家家一样。
改变规则没有问题，应该是先发通知。我猜想之所以弄成现在的黑箱，就是方便自己的解释，可以随时更改。很难想象这个全球最大的社媒平台可以如此任性。
HenryMorgan@HenryMorgan_X
My name is HenryMorgan, and I am an original content creator on X. Recently, my content has performed exceptionally well: I’ve reached over 15 million impressions in a recent period, and my work is original—no reposts, no AI-generated material, and no policy violations. Yet my Creator Revenue Sharing payouts have disappeared, or dropped so far below the $30 minimum threshold that I’ve received zero payouts for this cycles—despite generating massive traffic. This contradicts basic logic and fairness: My traffic and visibility have grown significantly. Why has my income vanished? X emphasizes “Verified Home Timeline impressions” and views from Premium users. My content is being widely seen. Why is the algorithm calculating near-zero earnings? Everything about my account is improving—impressions, engagement, content quality—but my revenue is gone. Does that make sense? Or is there an issue with the platform’s opaque, black-box algorithm? I’m not just complaining about a number. I’m questioning the lack of transparency and fairness in the entire system. Support only sends template replies: “Check the terms,” “Earnings roll over if below $30,” or “We can’t share calculation details.” That’s not support—it’s deflection. If the algorithm silently favors certain formats, viewer groups, or hidden weights—causing many original creators’ work to be undervalued or erased—this is a serious problem. 15 million impressions of fully original content shouldn’t fail to meet the minimum payout. How many creators will lose motivation and leave because of this? I am ready to cooperate fully and provide all needed data: post IDs, impression breakdowns, audience sources, time frames—whatever is required. I want a reasonable, transparent explanation, not more scripted responses. If this is a systemic issue affecting many original creators, it will harm X’s creator ecosystem. X relies on creators to attract and retain users. Undermining trust in monetization will ultimately hurt the platform itself. I urge the higher-level team to review my account data and provide an honest answer. Creators aren’t cash machines. We invest time, creativity, and effort to bring value to X. Don’t let an opaque black box destroy trust in the platform. I request an escalated review of my data. Please DM or reply—I will provide full cooperation.@X @Premium @elonmusk @lindayaX @grok #XCreatorRevenue #CreatorPayouts #XMonetization #FixCreatorEarnings
中文
想要在 Mac 上同时登录多个微信账号？
这个开源工具或许能帮你解决大问题。
我开发了一款 macOS 原生 SwiftUI 应用，支持一键克隆任意 .app。
通过修改 Bundle ID，让原本只能单开的应用实现“影分身”，目前测试了微信，是没有问题的。
开源地址
github.com/tobemaster56/a…
━━━━━
💡 核心特性
🔹 原生开发：SwiftUI 编写，丝滑且轻量。
🔹 操作简单：直接选中应用即可生成克隆版。
🔹 多号共存：真正实现不同账号互不干扰。
━━━━━
⚠️ 避坑指南（使用前必看）
1️⃣ 更新逻辑
克隆版无法自动通过 App Store 更新。原版升级后，只需删掉旧克隆重弄一遍。
2️⃣ 签名限制
部分沙盒应用在重签名后会拒绝启动，这是技术底层限制，非工具 Bug。
3️⃣ 检测机制
极少数应用存在运行时“单实例检测”，此类应用目前无法克隆。
4️⃣ 数据安全
工具不会触碰原始 App 数据，但折腾前建议【务必备份】重要聊天记录。
━━━━━
📢 友情提示
如果是微信，建议克隆版仅用于登录不重要的小号，主号还是留在原版更稳妥。
koffuxu@koffuxu
中文