Rahul
2.1K posts

Rahul
@selfawareatom
Founding member and leading the foundation models team @sarvamai.

Today, we’re taking a step toward truly galactic-scale capabilities. 🚀 We’re partnering with @SarvamAI to bring sovereign AI into orbit aboard India’s first orbital data centre satellite, a pathfinder mission bringing datacenter-class GPUs and high-performance remote sensing together in space. Built and operated by Pixxel, with Sarvam providing the AI backbone, the demonstrator marks a step toward making orbital data centres real, operational, and scalable from India. May the 4th be with us all! ✨

We are excited to announce that Sarvam is partnering with @PixxelSpace to power the AI backbone of India's first orbital data centre satellite. This is a first for the country, with India-built AI models running on an India-built satellite and both training and inference happening directly in orbit, without any dependence on foreign cloud or ground infrastructure.

Imagine sitting in a theatre in 1999 & seeing this for the first time.

This is true. Modern religion absolutely uses gods as a gap-filler. But in Hinduism, there has always been deeper philosophical thought. And the gap-filling has been done in an amazing way, where our philosophers arrived at remarkably abstract conclusions through pure philosophical reasoning. And we can easily retrofit concepts of modern science into it. Stage 1: We questioned our own Gods The Rigveda's Nasadiya Sukta (Rigveda 10.129) is arguably the world's first agnostic cosmological text. It doesn't say "Indra created everything." It says: नासदासीन्नो सदासीत्तदानीं नासीद्रजो नो व्योमा परो यत्। किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद्गहनं गभीरम्॥ "Neither non-existence nor existence was there then. Neither the realm of space nor the sky beyond. What stirred? Where? In whose protection? Was there water, unfathomably deep?" को अद्धा वेद क इह प्र वोचत् कुत आजाता कुत इयं विसृष्टिः। अर्वाग्देवा अस्य विसर्जनेनाथा को वेद यत आबभूव॥ "Who really knows? Who will here proclaim it? Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation? The gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe. Who then knows whence it has arisen?" This is the Rigveda itself saying: the gods don't know either, and an acknowledgment that the origin of existence exceeds all gods and all human comprehension. Stage 2: We replaced gods with an abstract entity By the time the Upanishads came around, we had an answer. Uddalaka Aruni teaches his son Svetaketu about an impersonal, all-pervasive being: सदेव सोम्येदमग्र आसीदेकमेवाद्वितीयम्। "In the beginning, my dear, this was Being alone, one only, without a second." (Chandogya Upanishad 6.2.1) No Vishnu. No Brahma. Just Sat, pure existence, undifferentiated. Then comes the famous: तत्त्वमसि श्वेतकेतो। "That thou art, Svetaketu." (Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7) The substance that constitutes the cosmos is the same substance that constitutes you. Note that this is millennia before we knew about the big bang. We are getting glimpses of what will eventually become Advaita philosophy. Everything is one, but acting as the observer and the observed. Stage 3: We made the entity into something more pervasive The Mundaka Upanishad describes Brahman in terms that sound eerily similar to various fields of the Standard Model. ब्रह्मैवेदममृतं पुरस्तात् ब्रह्म पश्चात् ब्रह्म उत्तरतो दक्षिणतश्चोत्तरेण। अधश्चोर्ध्वं च प्रसृतं ब्रह्मैवेदं विश्वमिदं वरिष्ठम्॥ "Brahman alone is all this immortal being, in front, behind, to the right and the left, below and above. Brahman alone is all this universe, the supreme." (Mundaka Upanishad 2.2.11) We move from a person-god / entity to a kind of field: omnidirectional, all-pervasive, constituting everything. The Mandukya Upanishad actually opens with: ॐ इत्येतदक्षरमिदं सर्वं तस्योपव्याख्यानं भूतं भवद् भविष्यदिति सर्वमोंकार एव। यच्चान्यत् त्रिकालातीतं तदप्योंकार एव॥ "OM; this syllable is all this. All that is past, present, and future, all of it is OM. And whatever transcends the three times, that too is OM." (Mandukya Upanishad 1.1) Stage 4: We finally described how multiplicity arises from unity The Upanishads talk about the actual act of creation in a very interesting way. Not as a god making things, but as a single consciousness differentiating itself. Though the Aitareya says: आत्मा वा इदमेक एवाग्र आसीत्। नान्यत्किञ्च मिषत्। स ईक्षत लोकान्नु सृजा इति॥ "In the beginning, this was the Self alone. Nothing else existed. It thought: 'Let me now create the worlds.'" (Aitareya Upanishad 1.1.1) The act of creation itself is the Self splitting into Prakriti, which fills up the universe. But this splitting does not deplete the Self. As the Isavasya Upanishad says पूर्णमदः पूर्णमिदं पूर्णात्पूर्णमुदच्यते। पूर्णस्य पूर्णमादाय पूर्णमेवावशिष्यते॥ "That is whole. This is whole. From wholeness, wholeness proceeds. Taking wholeness from wholeness, wholeness alone remains." The Mundaka puts it very nicely: यथोर्णनाभिः सृजते गृह्णते च यथा पृथिव्यामोषधयः सम्भवन्ति। यथा सतः पुरुषात्केशलोमानि तथाऽक्षरात्सम्भवतीह विश्वम्॥ "As a spider spins and withdraws its thread, as plants grow from the earth, as hair grows from a living person, so from the Imperishable, this universe arises." (Mundaka Upanishad 1.1.7) It is basically saying the universe emerges from Brahman the way a web emerges from a spider. The substance of creation is not separate from the creator. The spider doesn't use external material; it produces the web from itself. You can draw parallels to the quantum field theory: Purusha is the field. Prakriti is the field in excitation. The particles, forces, and structures of the universe are not separate from the field; they are the field, vibrating. And when those excitations cease, the field remains; whole, unchanged, exactly as it was. To conclude, it is fascinating to me that modern science and these ancient dharmic thinkers were asking the same question: what is the fundamental nature of reality? Science uses mathematics and experiment. Our philosophers used pure reason and introspection. They arrived at surprisingly similar answers. Make of that what you will.



@Dank_jetha Humanity creates GOD whenever science can't explain. Sun God,Rain God etc were created because anchestors didn't know how they worked . Now some people believe Vishnu or Allah created Big Bang because Science can't explain how big bang happened.

As a Hindu, I believe the entire Universe is the manifestation of the Divine. All of it - the river, the tree, the snake, the stone, the earthworm, the cow, the monkey, the elephant - all of it is divine manifestation. That belief is not Demonic, it is not Satanic, that is the path to living in harmony with nature and with other human beings. Arrogant, intolerant monotheism - see the video below - that goes around labeling reverence for all of nature as "demonic" and "satanic"- that belief is what makes men do evil. History supplies ample evidence. Hindus did not run crusades. Hindus did not burn witches at the stake. Hindus did not invade nations and enslave people in the name of bringing "Civilization" and "God" to "pagans".

Why are they remaking Harry Potter when there's no problem with the current movies?



JUST IN: Artemis II crew experiences issues with Microsoft Outlook on their way to the Moon, asks ground crew for assistance.

OpenAI raises $122 billion to open its first training datacenter in India - All models serving Indian audience will be trained locally by Indian scientists. - All Indian user data will stay within India. First 'zero cooling cost' datacenter to open in Ladakh where servers will be naturally cooled for 8 months a year












