Shane Killian

@AlisDekay Whoever came up with GloboHomo should be locked away as a danger to the species.

@shanedk I am not referring to like, as someone else mentioned, taping a banana to the wall. Might be more accurate to say the blandism than minimalism. Just everything lowest common denominator. Not talking about modern art as it were.

Even if there was some reason legitimate reason to oppose AI art (there isn't) the possibility alone that AI art could kill the minimalism trend is worth AI art existing and becoming common place.

If you don't instantly see the problem with this logic, you might be a collectivist!

AI facial recognition matched the wrong person, but a simple check of records could have cleared her in minutes. Yet she spent months in jail, losing everything in the process. AI is far from perfect. But when authorities treat AI results as reliable evidence rather than a mere lead, the consequences can be devastating. This isn't just about AI facial recognition gone wrong; it's about accountability, due process, and the dangers of cutting corners. If we're going to use powerful tools like AI, we need to demand better from the people using them. youtu.be/m66CiSyiP4g

The Internet is rightfully outraged at the wrongful imprisonment of a grandmother who spent months in jail because of an AI facial recognition match. But the culprit here isn't the AI; it's the detective who could have easily ruled her out. Video in reply.

@Itsfoss They'd probably also include a utility to hack it.

What if Kali Linux adds age verification?

@djcows Uh, can anyone say, violation of the Second Law of Thermodyamics?

startup idea: submerged GPUs to heat the water to create steam to spin turbines to generate electricity to power the GPUs

@doromiert Yes, novels were considered low and base.

@shanedk knowing the stupidity of our species highly likely didn't we at one point basically treat books as brainrot?

I wonder if, when matches were invented, there were people out there screeching, "REAL fires are made with flint!!!"

@MbarkCherguia Is part of the challenge realizing that the letterhead is made by an AI that can't spell and the text a font typed by someone with no spellcheck?

This is supposed to be one of the hardest problems ever to solve. Is it? Or isn’t it?

@TerraDraca It was kind of an odd thing to tell an author who's had his own comic for years!

@shanedk Blocked me too when I pointed out the obvious. No wonder they hate AI. They can't handle being challenged even a little bit.

If my takes are so bad, then why did you block me so I can't reply, you fucking coward? x.com/KittenOfSafety…

@DavidMFrost2 @Artedeingenio @CopyrightOffice YOU said "they will reject your application out of hand if you can't satisfy them that you DID NOT use AI *at any time*." EMPHASIS YOURS. And that IS NOT TRUE. All I needed was one counterexample to show that you LIED, and I have it.

@shanedk @Artedeingenio @CopyrightOffice I'll assume you mean A.), Mister Matchmaker 😏 Shall I upload THE ENTIRE EMAIL I got from @CopyrightOffice along with my successful (the registration went through after I sent that & I have the certificate in my desk now) reply, redacting only my personal email? Shut up then? 💝

My favorite complaint from AI haters is: "you didn’t do anything, the AI did it." Name a single art form where you can create something without a tool. Following that logic, the pencil makes the drawing, the brush makes the painting, the chisel makes the sculpture, and the camera takes the photo. So the only art that deserves to be called art would be the one that exists only in the mind and is never materialized. The problem is, if it’s never expressed, you can’t even know if it truly exists. Schrödinger’s art.

Gotta love the people who spew bullshit, and then try to block you so you can't reply. His LIE that I'm my own source is easily debunked by a simple mouse click on the video. He'd rather spend HOURS paying attention to how he can avoid that than take a few seconds to see if he's wrong! Because he CANNOT allow himself to be wrong. Just like the flat-Earthers, just like the moon hoaxers, just like the creationists.

@KittenOfSafety @ehyeahwhatever @amateuradam "Go out of your way" except to make ONE SINGLE MOUSE CLICK...

I ran some of my writing through an AI checker. 29.7% robot-generated! Thing is, it obviously wasn't. Ethical and creative reasons aside, the book in question is nearly a decade old - well before technology could do this. 1/3

@KittenOfSafety @ehyeahwhatever @amateuradam And he blocked me, the coward!

@KittenOfSafety @ehyeahwhatever @amateuradam And incidentally: you're posting an awful lot for someone who doesn't care at all about the topic!

@Artedeingenio Bill Alexander's channel: @AAlexanderArt" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@AAlexanderArt

@Artedeingenio And the proof is in what people respond to, which is the point of art. Give them too much detail, and it'll be boring. Simplify it, and you leave it to the observer to fill in the details!

@DavidMFrost2 @Artedeingenio @CopyrightOffice That is an OUTRIGHT LIE. …037860.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/44037860…

@Artedeingenio A.) That's not how anything works at the @CopyrightOffice (they will reject your application out of hand if you can't satisfy them that you DID NOT use AI *at any time*) — creating something, & STEALING something are two clean separate things; & B.) I don't need a tool like you.

The replies to this are all we need to know that the anti-AI mob is in the same intellectual category as creationists and flat-Earthers.