Sharon Clark

@keeping_up_kcee 😕

I'm glad I took my mental health walk, with my dumbass weighted vest before seeing the dumbass election results. Who tf doesn't want more pay? The poorest counties in this godforsaken state, apparently. Y'all wouldn't know a good thing if it bit you on the ass.

My daughter sends. She knows all about this. Also please come over so I can feed you

💯

THE MAGA AGENDA: protect the fetus, starve the child, honor the soldier, abandon the veteran, enrich the corporations, and fleece the worker, quote the Bible but ignore every single fucking verse.

I refuse to watch The Hunt For Red October because I don't like movies with sub titles.

Join us for the Philadelphia Stories online book event featuring the talented Oliva Emerick! 📚✨ Check out the details here: philadelphiastories.org #PhiladelphiaStories #OlivaEmerick #BookEvent #LiteraryCommunity

Dear @RepRalphNorman: Please watch this video. You and I were Members of Congress when January 6 happened. Remember? Happy to bring police officers who were assaulted on January 6 to your office so they can explain to you how they got their injuries.

WTAF. The LIES of these ass-licking sycophants are so outrageous and blatant I can’t believe I’m hearing them. So disgusting and enraging. 🤬😤

Keep posting this so people don’t forget how truly bad this event was. Don’t let people gaslight you into thinking it was peaceful and worthy of 1500+ pardons and slush fund payoffs.

@TheCinesthetic One of my favorites!

The Fifth Element (1997) feels like Luc Besson was given unlimited money and told to make the strangest blockbuster imagination could produce. Every frame is overloaded with costumes, color, and pure sci-fi energy. Somehow it all comes together perfectly.

@MetamorphLitAg Welcome!

🎉 Please join us in welcoming our newest author, Sarah Burr! 📚✨ We are thrilled to have her on board and can't wait for you to dive into her captivating stories. Stay tuned for updates and releases! #NewAuthor #BookCommunity #AuthorSpotlight #ReadingAdventure

Forgive me for sounding like a broken record, but we are not a Christian nation. We are a nation where you are free to be a Christian. Your religion guides you, not all of us. It’s as simple as that.

@keeping_up_kcee 😄

I don't wanna brag, but my leg was featured on the news. I missed seeing it, but my bosses are having a field day with this entire thing. 💀🫠🤣🤣

Kids, Tickle Me Elmo is now 30 so tell your parents if he asks to tickle you.

Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT. The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time. A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B. Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself. GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won. Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective. It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect. Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance. 99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time. If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars. Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.

People need to wake up now! 👇👇