𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘

8.3K posts

𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘

𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘

@shardulcool52

🇮🇳🌐

India Katılım Kasım 2014
477 Takip Edilen110 Takipçiler
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Kiran
Kiran@KiranMechstars·
You should have mentioned 'Bal Gangadhar Tilak's stand on this case. On 22nd March 1887,in his Newspaper Kesari,he criticized Rukhmabai's stand. He wrote that according to Hindu Dharmashastra, court's verdict is correct. Such man is given so much importance in history books.
Sann@san_x_m

Her name was Rukhmabai Raut. She was born on November 22 1864 in Bombay. Her father, Janardhan Pandurang, died when she was very young. Her mother, Jayantibai, later married Dr Sakharam Arjun, an eminent physician and social reformer in Bombay. When Rukhmabai was 11 years old she was married to Dadaji Bhikaji, a 19 year old cousin of her stepfather. It was agreed that Dadaji would live in the household and be provided for while he pursued his education. He showed no interest in either. He fell into debt, moved to his uncle’s house and eventually demanded that Rukhmabai join him. She refused. She continued living with her mother and stepfather. She studied on her own using books borrowed from a church library. She attended social reform meetings. She had no intention of living with a man she had been given to as a child. In 1884 Dadaji sent a legal notice demanding she join him. The case went to court in 1885. During the hearings Rukhmabai wrote two letters to the Times of India under the pseudonym “A Hindu Lady.” She argued that a child cannot consent to marriage. She argued that no court should force a woman to live with a husband she was given to before she could understand what marriage meant. The first judgment went in her favour. The judge said he could not compel a young lady married in her “helpless infancy.” Dadaji appealed. The second judge ruled against her in 1887. He gave her one month to go to her husband. If she refused the punishment was six months in jail. She said she would rather go to jail. The case created a political storm across India and Britain. Indian reformers and British feminists petitioned Queen Victoria. Dadaji eventually accepted a payment of two thousand rupees and dissolved the marriage in 1888. The prolonged public battle around her case directly contributed to the Age of Consent Act of 1891, which raised the minimum age of consent for marriage from ten to twelve years. It was a small step. But it was the first time the law moved at all. Rukhmabai then left for England. She completed her medical degree at the London School of Medicine for Women. She returned to India in 1894 and joined the Women’s Hospital in Surat. She became India’s first practising woman doctor. She retired in Bombay and spent her later years writing against the practice of purdah and advocating for widows’ rights. She died on September 25 1955. She was 90 years old. Most Indians have never heard her name. Follow for stories India deserves to remember.

English
1
5
13
207
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Sann
Sann@san_x_m·
Her name was Rukhmabai Raut. She was born on November 22 1864 in Bombay. Her father, Janardhan Pandurang, died when she was very young. Her mother, Jayantibai, later married Dr Sakharam Arjun, an eminent physician and social reformer in Bombay. When Rukhmabai was 11 years old she was married to Dadaji Bhikaji, a 19 year old cousin of her stepfather. It was agreed that Dadaji would live in the household and be provided for while he pursued his education. He showed no interest in either. He fell into debt, moved to his uncle’s house and eventually demanded that Rukhmabai join him. She refused. She continued living with her mother and stepfather. She studied on her own using books borrowed from a church library. She attended social reform meetings. She had no intention of living with a man she had been given to as a child. In 1884 Dadaji sent a legal notice demanding she join him. The case went to court in 1885. During the hearings Rukhmabai wrote two letters to the Times of India under the pseudonym “A Hindu Lady.” She argued that a child cannot consent to marriage. She argued that no court should force a woman to live with a husband she was given to before she could understand what marriage meant. The first judgment went in her favour. The judge said he could not compel a young lady married in her “helpless infancy.” Dadaji appealed. The second judge ruled against her in 1887. He gave her one month to go to her husband. If she refused the punishment was six months in jail. She said she would rather go to jail. The case created a political storm across India and Britain. Indian reformers and British feminists petitioned Queen Victoria. Dadaji eventually accepted a payment of two thousand rupees and dissolved the marriage in 1888. The prolonged public battle around her case directly contributed to the Age of Consent Act of 1891, which raised the minimum age of consent for marriage from ten to twelve years. It was a small step. But it was the first time the law moved at all. Rukhmabai then left for England. She completed her medical degree at the London School of Medicine for Women. She returned to India in 1894 and joined the Women’s Hospital in Surat. She became India’s first practising woman doctor. She retired in Bombay and spent her later years writing against the practice of purdah and advocating for widows’ rights. She died on September 25 1955. She was 90 years old. Most Indians have never heard her name. Follow for stories India deserves to remember.
Sann tweet media
English
21
237
646
23.2K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Neoliberal Akiho ✨🇺🇳🇨🇦
Wanting to ban lab grown meat is probably one of the most needlessly evil political opinions anyone could have.
English
91
466
7K
84.4K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Jack
Jack@Jac5Connor·
Btw I saw the sacking of Troy scene from The Odyssey already. They played it before Project Hail Mary in Imax. And, it was the greatest thing I've ever seen in my life. So all this kvetching is going to be hilarious once the movie drops.
English
143
43
935
56.9K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
bumblebreeze DIVEST
bumblebreeze DIVEST@siberianpine·
@romanhelmetguy Best translation ever, has done more to stimulate interesting conversation about the story and intentions of the original than ever before, pissed off the most boring people to ever who think odysseus is their friend
English
1
1
140
3.2K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘@shardulcool52·
@Indo_Realist @AaryanPrateekX Kiara. The Akash case was quite different, she lied to Akash. He believed she was a virgin too. Otherwise no one in their right mindset would have trolled Akash.
English
1
0
0
76
Indo Realist ⚕️
Indo Realist ⚕️@Indo_Realist·
@shardulcool52 @AaryanPrateekX Ok. Your sexual past as a woman before marriage shouldn’t matter. Ur man I famous, so sadly, it does. So you did it once. Akash gets destroyed. Ok. I can see. A mistake. You do it again? Akash literally has to quit Flagrant. What a beeech of the highest order. Scum.
English
1
0
0
118
Prateekaaryan 𝕏
Prateekaaryan 𝕏@AaryanPrateekX·
Siddharth Malhotra joins Ranveer Singh on the elite list of publicly humiliated cucks by their wives.
Prateekaaryan 𝕏 tweet mediaPrateekaaryan 𝕏 tweet media
English
83
558
9.4K
923.7K
Indo Realist ⚕️
Indo Realist ⚕️@Indo_Realist·
@AaryanPrateekX North American Jeeta did the same to comedian Akash Singh. Why are jeetas doing this to their husbands publicly ??
English
1
0
42
25.2K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Joshua A. Streeter; ὃς μάλα πολλὰ/πλάγχθη
Christopher Nolan asked the Oracle of Delphi, "Will audiences love my adaptation of the Odyssey?" And the Pythia replied, "They will discuss it non-stop for months before it even premieres." And away he went, glad in this heart, poor fool.
English
120
2.4K
27.2K
335.3K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Variety
Variety@Variety·
'The Odyssey': Why Elon Musk and His Troll Army's Attacks Aren't Just Silly but Wildly Inaccurate variety.com/2026/film/opin…
English
245
103
770
61.5K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Sami Gold
Sami Gold@souljagoyteller·
Nolan’s film Oppenheimer won 7 Oscars 3 years ago (including Best Picture and Best Director) as a movie without a single prominent non-white character/actor and an almost entirely white production crew
C3@C_3C_3

To be eligible to win Best Picture at the Oscars… 1. At least 1 Non-White/Non-Straight lead or Significant Role. 2. At least 30% minor roles Non-White/Non-Straight people. 3. At least 2 Departments headed by Non-White/Non-Straight people. This is why Nolan did it. Coward.

English
58
172
4.5K
202.3K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
𝙻𝚎𝚊𝚟𝚎𝙷𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚍𝙰𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 🇨🇦
I’m tired of this level of sanitising headlines and stories. Call it exactly what it is. Elon Musk is a racist transphobe targeting (and “liking/engaging/boosting” posts which target) Lupita Nyong'o and Elliot Page because he is a bottom feeder who is just desperate to be liked and the only people he can appeal to are fucking 12-year-old racist edgelords who have blue checks because mom stopped buying their Robux. That’s the story. He’s not “bashing” Chris Nolan for wanting awards don’t obscure his bigotry because you’re scared.
𝙻𝚎𝚊𝚟𝚎𝙷𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚍𝙰𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 🇨🇦 tweet media𝙻𝚎𝚊𝚟𝚎𝙷𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚍𝙰𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 🇨🇦 tweet media
Variety@Variety

Elon Musk is bashing Christopher Nolan for #TheOdyssey casting, alleging the director cast Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy because he “wants the awards.” In additional X posts, Musk re-tweeted posts that mocked Elliot Page’s masculinity and claimed that Nolan was stomping all over Homer’s grave because of his casting choices. variety.com/2026/film/news…

English
21
280
1.6K
46.5K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Variety
Variety@Variety·
From the team that brought you “Why is Snow White Latina?,” “Why are there Black people in ‘The Rings of Power’?,” and “Star Wars has gone woke” comes the latest online onslaught against the diverse cast of “The Odyssey.” These culture warriors have been led to battle by their own personal Agamemnon, Elon Musk. Read the full story now: variety.com/2026/film/opin…
Variety tweet media
English
6K
638
5.8K
4.3M
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘@shardulcool52·
@MarkLazerus It's not bad for the reason chuds think it's bad but I think it's not very good
English
0
0
0
30
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘 retweetledi
Tanushree Pandey
Tanushree Pandey@TanushreePande·
Amit, only prostitution is prostitution. Kya iss ladki ne aapko bola hai ki paise lekar sexual favours degi aapko? Ya kahin mention kiya usne apni video mein ye cheez? Then how did you directly conclude “this is prostitution”? Call the content cringe, distasteful, attention-seeking if you must ... fair enough. But seedha “prostitute” bol dena is irresponsible, and shows your mindset, especially for someone with such a large audience. Bacchi hai yaar. Do you realise a lot of young boys who follow you will absorb this language and attitude? Wo kalko is ladki ko chedenge, gande gande comments karenge, bolke ki aisi ladkiyan toh public property hain ... The rape mindset starts exactly like this. Itna kuch chal raha hai desh mein, aur outrage ke liye ek ladki mili hai aapko?
amit kilhor@amitkilhor

This is prostituition. Though I support instagram dance and content accounts( means it's ok til the time it doesn't bother anyone, why moral police). But, this is prostituition. But as Seinfeld would say - Not that there is anything wrong with it.

English
413
221
2.4K
312.7K
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘
𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗘@shardulcool52·
@mayeahwe I was a fan when I read them in 6-7th grade. Was shocked upon re read how bad the prose is and how shallow the story is.
English
0
0
7
767