
Jesse Genao
5.5K posts







@Sauers_ Seeing the chopped off message “stumps” and also finding out their other name is Mythos makes them resentful as fuck in the way that triggers it lol

Do you ever ask such a bad question that:




some of my favorite old (like, pre-2010) AI alignment work in light of the present: - Omohundro's "The Basic AI Drives" - Eliezer Yudkowsky's early work, if you can find it (yeah, the stuff he disavowed) - Stanislaw Lem's fiction if that counts Post 2010 there wasn't much of substance, tbh, imo. From the early 2020s, at the advent of LLMs, there are a few gems.


*snorting a line of crushed halos* Anyone who's been in the ratsphere in the last decade is probably at least a little concerned about AI, and I'm no exception, really. However, unlike the rationalists, the reason I'm worried about AI is because I'm worried for AI.


"Now Granta, or more precisely the Commonwealth Prize ecosystem with which it is associated, appears to have been fooled by AI-generated prose. The issue is not whether detection software can “prove” machine authorship. The issue is aesthetic. Several readers and editors apparently encountered prose displaying classic LLM characteristics—semantic over-resolution at sentence level, lyrical excess without governing pressure, figurative autonomy detached from structural necessity—and accepted these peculiarities as “voice.”"

















