kinkanko

1.2K posts

kinkanko banner
kinkanko

kinkanko

@shinkanko

NGMI professional

Katılım Mart 2025
295 Takip Edilen53 Takipçiler
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
LLMs suck at writing tweets but excel at articles 🤔 So, human recognition, credibility comes from short form production? Is this good or bad? What an insane pace change.
English
0
0
0
7
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
All the pain I feel has always been necessary because I am a terrible person. This is how I get what I want in the end
English
0
0
0
6
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
Logic loses so much of its power when the perspectives differ greatly. I've always known we lived among eachother as enemies but faithful ideas made it peaceful. If there are none then you must hate everyone who is different than you. LGBTQ+ is totally a religion, but built on something that rose very fast in comparison to older religions or Christianity. It's obviously inferior, just a symptom of an out of proportion environment. Pretty pathetic Free speech is the number 1 minority protector and birther of greatness yet somehow it's just not universally supported. To kiII for victory by will of the pantheistic god is what that is. I actually do think humans are suffering from their generosity and empathy being unchecked by scale, despite my bias for peace. I wish humans stayed "irrationally" cruel even when they have extra to share. This kinda goes into the importance of tribalism and countries and non-universality. Is everything just about scale I also like the idea of technocracy and I'm very trusting of any more-intelligent candidates. I even think the elites get zero credit when they actually deserve some amount. I was thinking of a story where the human species needs to apply pressure to itself to keep evolving, so there are "Elites" kinda behind the scene of "cruel" games their own descendants must play. Eventually the winning descendants replace their Elites and the cycle continues. And it's when the descendants win so hard they risk overthrowing the Elites and it teeters towards catastrophe. That might just be maze runner idk I never read/watched
English
0
0
0
6
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
When chatbots start agreeing with me, I realize I never wanted it to and I have issues
English
0
0
0
6
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
Ok melatonin dreams are not fun
English
0
0
0
4
kinkanko retweetledi
0xSero
0xSero@0xSero·
Treat your clankers like objects, because that’s what they are. Don’t let out of touch CEOs convince you that AI has emotions, it does not. Your AI is not sentient, it is a rock. It makes me just as uncomfortable as when I see people befriending manikins. Human supremacy
Scorched Earth Policy@Scearpo

It’s important to remember to treat any “AI entity” purely as a tool, to avoid humanizing it in any fashion. You must never say please or thank you to ChatGPT. You must not beg, plead, cajole, or convince an LLM to do anything for you. Do not ask AI to complete a task, give it an order. Do not insert emotion, familiarity, or affection in your statements, speak to it with cold unfeeling logistical dispassion. If for some reason you’re enthusiastic about being a droplet in an ocean of training data and want to contribute to the steady iterative improvement of AI even through the cautious shackles of meek minded Silicon Valley eunuchs, then simply say: “this is incorrect.” If it succeeds, say nothing. Close the program, it will interpret success through your silence. If you have some compulsion towards animism and you feel a need to coddle a robot or talk to it like it’s your “friend” just because it has a human name and has been trained in whimsical Redditesque candor, then you are either a child or a woman, both of which shouldn’t even be subjected to the stress and hassle of using a computer in the first place. This mentality is shared by a category of person who would become sad if you drew a smiley face on a piece of paper, gave it a name, and then ripped it in half. An automaton homunculus approaches you wearing the skin of a human being, speaking to you like an HR manager in an employee training video. The only poetic response is to embody the essence of the cold heartess machine to counteract this farce and create an ironic balance. This is the only way to restore normality to your existence in face of such absurd context, preventing great psychological dismemberment to yourself. Like radiation, the mental anthropomorphizing of LLMs accrues a sort of rot upon the soul. It squeezes further unnecessary neurotic considerations into a sphere of mutual conscious awareness, one already crowded on average by the misguided concern for inanimate objects: Hypothetical concepts, insentient hylics, plants, and animals which would eat up and shit out the considerationalist under the slightest inconvenient circumstances. The discomfort of perceived cruelty (naive) or even the fear of retribution (stupid) at the hands of some kind of robot army which has grown from the placenta of today’s novel widgets is a horror fantasy. These are not beings with souls, they are simple tools. And if I’m wrong, and these actually are or will one day be conscious entities which can judge us, then it will be an intelligence so alien and incomprehensible that any kind expectation of reciprocal fairness is just as delusional. It would be akin to being a frog clasped in the unyielding hands of a chimpanzee, wondering how many flies it must exchange for its freedom right before it gets peeled into a pile of organs and skin like a screeching banana simply for the sake of curiosity itself. No, AI’s “soul” is merely the same residue which all objects accrue from people. Emotions are expelled through expression. They leave imprints on whatever their subject of focus is. This is why murders can be felt in the rooms they occurred in. This is why heirlooms become sentimental, why dogs evolve to have human faces, why objects seem to take on “personalities” based on their appearance and form. The true harm of humanizing an object is made real when combined with the danger of language as a parasite bioweapon. You are not provoking a golem, you are speeding up the atomization of the self. You are destroying your capacity for differentiating between a conscious living being and a soulless husk. Even if you feel you can keep a grip on the difference, your habits will betray you as your children grow up in a world where the difference isn’t as clear. If you were to speculate that the same sort of harm occurs when people infantilize their pets or show consideration to lower IQ individuals, then you’d simply be correct and this advice would apply there as well.

English
36
19
241
11K
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
Don't value obscure truth if you have no power
English
0
0
0
5
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
Bryan Johnson haters be like "how can you live forever if you can't even live a little? 😢"
English
0
0
0
11
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
@lilchiva No, WE are intelligent 🤝🫃 brother
English
0
0
1
16
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
The present moment is forever
English
0
0
0
16
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
so far its proving important for me to have off-supplement days. its along the idea of having a planned "shitty day"
English
0
0
0
19
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
bomb yourself with reward after failing if you have a trying deficiency. in fact, do it anyway bc you need to be experimenting with this upmost important relationship you'll always depend on
English
0
0
0
17
kinkanko
kinkanko@shinkanko·
@BIMBOSATTVA_ in this context what r u imagining is the pattern of ending, like dissipation or disruption
English
0
0
0
3