Shrini Kulkarni

7.2K posts

Shrini Kulkarni

Shrini Kulkarni

@shrinik

What if ... Really? .... So what?

Pune, India Katılım Aralık 2008
179 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
@himanshustwts how is this different from konwledgegraph/ontology ? Looks like RAG extended to me - is that how it is?
English
0
0
0
514
himanshu
himanshu@himanshustwts·
and here is the full architecture of the LLM Knowledge Base system covering every stage from ingest to future explorations.
himanshu tweet media
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.

English
101
581
5.8K
659.3K
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
Indusind bank credit card - Your customer service is so bad - first to get through it is difficult, at times I get busy tone. Then after crossing all hurdles - you make me wait for more than 20 mins with music that goes on and on. @MyIndusIndBank Fail.
English
1
1
0
51
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
@maaretp @johannarothman Everybody's job = Whole team's job. Programmers do not (typically) go around say let me improve my testing skills. Do they? But testers are often boast of programming skills
English
0
0
0
0
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
@maaretp @johannarothman I have problem with thinking only writing code is testing and testing is everybody's job. The thought process seems to testing does not have any special skills.
English
0
0
0
0
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
@maaretp @johannarothman Thinking testing as a service keeps us from agile teams. Fair enough. Let us consider testing as core part of how we develop software - what if agile teams think testing = writing code ?
English
0
0
0
0
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
@xflibble @RachelNotley @jonathan_kohl Also consider some long term effects of masks. Generally most of us breath shallow. with pollution out there amount of fresh air and oxygen is small. now put mask. Is it ok if you breath sub-optimally say for 6 months...about 5 hrs a day?
English
4
0
0
0
Shrini Kulkarni
Shrini Kulkarni@shrinik·
@maaretp What is best way to sell a bug (meaning doing good testing to find an illusive/deep hidden bug and then) ? this bug is $1000 worth if left "unfixed" ?
English
0
0
0
0