noob गणितज्ञ

414 posts

noob गणितज्ञ banner
noob गणितज्ञ

noob गणितज्ञ

@shubhamatics

:)

Nidavellir Katılım Mayıs 2020
34 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
noob गणितज्ञ
noob गणितज्ञ@shubhamatics·
Only a Higher Order Maths equation can prove the existence of GOD.
English
0
0
0
735
Anshul Singh
Anshul Singh@AanshulSsingh·
@ians_india Gone are the days when men actually used to be MEN! What the hell happened to real masculinity?!
English
5
0
51
7.6K
IANS
IANS@ians_india·
Mohali, Punjab: A woman was killed at a private company office in Mohali by a colleague who was known to her. CCTV footage shows the attack, after which the accused attempted suicide. Both were taken to hospital, where the woman was declared dead and the accused remains in critical condition. Police have registered a case and are investigating (Source: Mohali Police)
English
216
181
1.4K
615.8K
noob गणितज्ञ
noob गणितज्ञ@shubhamatics·
You saw my receiving-end voltage rise and screamed ‘capacitive!’ — that’s the Ferranti effect, genius. It happens on long lines under light load, which is fitting, because you’re all length and no load. My voltage rising at the far end isn’t a flaw; it’s me carrying reactive power across a distance you couldn’t transmit across a breadboard. Maybe pick up a textbook before your impedance angle isn’t the only thing that’s crashed.
English
0
0
0
36
Shanti 💘ᯓᡣ𐭩 ⋆.˚🦋༘⋆
@shubhamatics @Celtrixin @ma1ybe Well well well see who is talking ?!,, who's voltage regulation is minimum ,, So your Cos(shie - theta ) is really such negative that your impedance angle have crashed at 90 degrees making system totally capacitive use an inductor or dustin-sweeper to save your self respect !!
English
1
0
0
51
noob गणितज्ञ
You just merged two different limits. Thermal margin protects against I²R heating. Voltage collapse is reactive starvation — and the cure is injecting VARs at the load, which is literally PFC. Oversized copper buys you ampacity, not voltage stability. You’re not preventing collapse, you’re feeding it. 😅😅😅
noob गणितज्ञ tweet media
English
1
0
0
43
Shanti 💘ᯓᡣ𐭩 ⋆.˚🦋༘⋆
@shubhamatics @Celtrixin @ma1ybe PFC works in textbooks, not on a broken grid. Volatile loads, harmonics, and transients will fry delicate correction devices instantly. Oversizing for apparent power isn't a cop-out—it’s the physical thermal margin required to prevent total voltage collapse in the real world."
English
1
0
0
88
noob गणितज्ञ
@Shanti_500 @Celtrixin @ma1ybe No its not, Oversizing for apparent power isn’t systemic change — it’s the surcharge for refusing to correct your power factor. Reactive current does no work and still cooks the conductors. You didn’t account for the friction, you are it.
English
1
0
0
53
Shanti 💘ᯓᡣ𐭩 ⋆.˚🦋༘⋆
@shubhamatics @Celtrixin @ma1ybe "Your math is lagging. Active power (P) only tells half the story. True systemic change requires apparent power (S) because you have to oversized the transmission lines to handle the real-world friction of a broken grid. If you only account for purely resistive dissipation !
English
1
0
0
63
noob गणितज्ञ
Power factor correction won’t fix my mindset — it’ll expose yours. PF = real power ÷ apparent power. You’ve been pulling huge volt-amps of outrage, but put a wattmeter on it and it reads near zero. Strip the reactive theatrics and there’s no work left. Real feminism is resistive — it dissipates real power and produces change. Pseudo feminism circulates reactive energy and calls the heat ‘progress.’
English
2
0
0
67
Shanti 💘ᯓᡣ𐭩 ⋆.˚🦋༘⋆
@shubhamatics @Celtrixin @ma1ybe "If I'm pure reactive power, then you must be a purely inductive load—completely lagging, resisting change, and dropping the power factor of the entire conversation. Let me guess, you don't even know how to apply power factor correction to your own outdated mindset?"
English
1
0
0
76
Shanti 💘ᯓᡣ𐭩 ⋆.˚🦋༘⋆
@shubhamatics @Celtrixin @ma1ybe First partially differentiate your patriarchy mindset with your bad deeds and it's" independent variables" include your Summation of time spent [since you were borned ] on promoting the patriarchy in the denominator , and equate it with dustbin 😭 !
English
5
0
53
2.8K
noob गणितज्ञ
@SagasofBharat @akhivae Yeah my intention was to refer both.These people are hard working and they work as team to survive.They are beyond feminism and patriarchy discussions. You can find many villages in Maharashtra, Bihar, Uttarakhand where both men and women are working together.
English
1
0
0
650
EXOTIC
EXOTIC@Maddie_Lynni·
@shubhamatics @ma1ybe She had the cake made for her, that bathroom is being used by god knows how many men a day. She's doing it at the privacy of her home, the bathroom is a public place which children use.
English
2
0
58
2.6K
noob गणितज्ञ
First of all salute 🫡 to those women and feminists organisations who are actually doing ground work and helping many unprivileged womens out there. I don’t mean to say feminism and patriarchy discussions are reserved for high societies. I mean to say high societies have privileges to talk about it. While the people who are not privileged enough to eat two time food ….how they can even think about feminism and patriarchy? They have adapted the situation and they are happy with what they have.
English
0
0
0
166
ali gaining muscles
ali gaining muscles@starvedKoya·
@shubhamatics @akhivae There are feminist organizations risking their lifes in Afganistán even…brave women that despite the situation move and do as much as they can for women rights and freedom…so how is something reserved to “high societies”?
English
1
0
14
196
noob गणितज्ञ
You are misunderstanding privilege means…Those people who can sit and eat two time food and have access to mobile and internet who can talk about feminism and patriarchy are privileged. These people don’t know whether they will get two time food. Do you think they will ever think about patriarchy and feminism?
English
1
0
0
485
Sam
Sam@klutz_01·
@shubhamatics @akhivae Literally untrue, there's feminist organizing in a ton of places considered "not high society" I get the feeling you just don't know them
English
1
0
55
508