ALLAH DESTROY HIM ALLAH DESTROY HIM

8K posts

ALLAH DESTROY HIM ALLAH DESTROY HIM banner
ALLAH DESTROY HIM ALLAH DESTROY HIM

ALLAH DESTROY HIM ALLAH DESTROY HIM

@shugo7o

you're worse than a murderer you're worse than a rapist you're worse than a terrorist you're worse than a pedophile in the eyes of Allah

22 Katılım Ekim 2024
581 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler
ALLAH DESTROY HIM ALLAH DESTROY HIM
@hardasiron @cirnosad you pitiful retard Mongols took decades for China and then wasted WEST/CENTRAL ASIA + EAST EUROPE Japan industrialized and Qing Manchus being isolationist China pushed #1 USA all the way back from CN/NK border to Seoul cucks like you are getting killed by immigrants yearly 🤦‍♂️
English
0
0
4
65
Operatore Subacqueo X-MAS ⚡︎
@cirnosad Chinese were always coward weaklings, they only have numbers. Mongols destroyed them easy peasy, Japanese too, they had the whole korea peninsula and americans pushed them back in days. Millenary culture of cucking.
English
5
0
10
498
Mysteries
Mysteries@LOTM_WORLD·
HOLY PEAK THIS IS CRAZY
English
22
115
2.1K
117.3K
Thomas A Brown
Thomas A Brown@reallythistoo·
Who invented something is historically less important than who made it useful and popularized. Much like Ford and Musk, who invented not cars and rockets but the enduring industries around them, for all practical purposes Gutenberg invented publishing.
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand

It's pretty unreal that people still believe Gutenberg invented the printing press, when it was invented a whole 7 centuries before in China. When Gutenberg painstakingly printed 300 bibles in 1450 and went bankrupt because of it (as that lady describes 👇), some texts in Asia were already printed at 1 million copies (!!!) as early as the 8th century! That's the case of the "One Million Pagodas and Dharani Prayers" commissioned by Empress Shōtoku of Japan around 764–770 AD (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%C5%9Bu…), a series of one million small wooden pagodas each containing a printed Buddhist scroll, thousands of which survive to this day. Heck China had mass printed paper money - called jiaozi - during the Song Dynasty, around the 10th century AD, so roughly 400-500 years before Gutenberg (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiaozi_(c…)! It's probably only in the 18th or 19th century that 1 million copies of *anything* got printed in Europe, meaning we were behind Asia by literally a whole millennium in that regard. Quite the testament of our incredibly parochial worldview that we turned a thousand-year technological lag into the founding myth of supposed Western intellectual superiority...

English
3
0
3
281
ALLAH DESTROY HIM ALLAH DESTROY HIM
@major_crawley @RnaudBertrand There is no such thing as the cultural revolution It’s bullshit created by fuckers like you to justify stealing artifacts around the world You’re literally asking questions since you don’t even have the answers to said questions
English
0
0
5
91
Major Rawdon Crawley
Major Rawdon Crawley@major_crawley·
@RnaudBertrand No doubt the Chinese "are extremely meticulous about conserving their history" now. Were they - or their Manchu rulers - in 1900? Were the Maoists of the Cultural Revolution? How much of the official written record is accurate, how much justification of the rulers' behaviour?
English
2
0
4
268
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
It's pretty unreal that people still believe Gutenberg invented the printing press, when it was invented a whole 7 centuries before in China. When Gutenberg painstakingly printed 300 bibles in 1450 and went bankrupt because of it (as that lady describes 👇), some texts in Asia were already printed at 1 million copies (!!!) as early as the 8th century! That's the case of the "One Million Pagodas and Dharani Prayers" commissioned by Empress Shōtoku of Japan around 764–770 AD (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi%C5%9Bu…), a series of one million small wooden pagodas each containing a printed Buddhist scroll, thousands of which survive to this day. Heck China had mass printed paper money - called jiaozi - during the Song Dynasty, around the 10th century AD, so roughly 400-500 years before Gutenberg (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiaozi_(c…)! It's probably only in the 18th or 19th century that 1 million copies of *anything* got printed in Europe, meaning we were behind Asia by literally a whole millennium in that regard. Quite the testament of our incredibly parochial worldview that we turned a thousand-year technological lag into the founding myth of supposed Western intellectual superiority...
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

Gutenberg invented the most important technology of the millennium and immediately went bankrupt — and so did the bank that foreclosed on him, and so did his apprentices. Gutenberg could make a batch of 300 books for the cost of one, but there weren't enough buyers in his small, landlocked village in Germany. It it took the better part of a century of further innovations, social changes, and setting up of distribution networks before you could have a pamphlet like Luther's 95 thesis get from Wittenberg to London in 17 days.

English
210
1.3K
5.3K
494.8K
Democrat frauds
Democrat frauds@JaredC47931·
@JeanGreige You are a fucking Chinese cultist. Amazing. Go live in china you stupid bitch.
English
1
0
0
99
PLA Military Updates🇨🇳
PLA Military Updates🇨🇳@PLA_MilitaryUpd·
Its funny that you say we don't know how to make ballistic missiles, maybe try doing some research, and search up how many types of Hypersonic missiles are armed on our ships, how many Ballistic missiles which have 3x bigger warheads we have than Iran x.com/Indian_Bronson…
ib@Indian_Bronson

It’s evident from Iran that China can’t make ballistic missiles or radars at US quality — China can’t replicate SpaceX either. But in making *everything else*, slightly less complex, like phones and cars, they dominate. This is the military equivalent:

English
7
4
102
6.6K
China pulse 🇨🇳
China pulse 🇨🇳@Eng_china5·
A Chinese student built an interesting app using vibe coding that visualizes nearly 5,000 artifacts in the British Museum from 99 countries around the world. The app shows: • When these artifacts arrived • Which country they came from • And how the distribution would look if all artifacts were returned to their countries of origin.
English
607
7.4K
26.4K
2.2M
Giokielicious
Giokielicious@jokieliu·
Painting China as imperialism is some kind of Vietnamese online liberal cope or sth ?
Giokielicious tweet media
English
179
37
1.1K
925.4K
pepper
pepper@JZhen14804·
Idk when is white karen blocked me but imagine still being racist while his government is murdering people overseas. I hope you pay $100 per gallon for gas. China remembers the 8 nation alliance and japanese invasion.
pepper tweet media
English
2
0
24
679
Niemontal
Niemontal@niemontal·
@LOTM_WORLD no, it just doesn't activate anything in my soul, nothing catches emotions seeing some completelly indistinct swordsman fight some indistinct goons in some indistinct ancient Chinese city. Empty gaze...like, ok, masses of soldiers fight...ok. skip, don't care.
English
1
0
0
294
Mysteries
Mysteries@LOTM_WORLD·
THIS DONGHUA LOOKS INSANE HOLY SHH Title: BLADES OF THE GUARDIANS
English
19
193
1.5K
39.5K
PLA Military Updates🇨🇳
PLA Military Updates🇨🇳@PLA_MilitaryUpd·
You fucking drove your planes 5000km off YOUR land to OUR land and call this a fucking “unsafe interaction”?? Fuck off, Aussies. x.com/abcnews/status…
PLA Military Updates🇨🇳 tweet media
ABC News@abcnews

#BREAKING: The Australian Defence Force says there has been another "unsafe interaction" with the Chinese military after a People's Liberation Army-Navy helicopter intercepted an Australian chopper in the Yellow Sea. ab.co/3PltAlK

English
508
1.7K
11.8K
574.1K
Juan But Not Forgotten
Juan But Not Forgotten@MexiCayde_6·
@yosoymario91 @ezra_pvnished_2 We didn't. We bombed the enemy into submission, forces them to sign our documents, & went on our Mary way. The cowardly commies decided to launch another invasion after we agreed not to interfere anymore and left. In the end? Communism oppresses the people like we said it would.
English
8
0
17
2.9K
Mojtaba Khamenei’s disfigured rotting corpse Ezra
“Average battle of the Vietnam War” Battle of Long Dik Forces: -30 American marines -2 South Vietnamese soldiers -20000 Viet Cong Losses: -1 marine wounded -18000 Viet Cong pulverized -1000 Viet Cong maimed Result: -Strategic North Vietnamese victory
English
105
635
22.4K
649.2K
indi.ca
indi.ca@indica·
The radars and bases America is losing are not worth billions. They are priceless. America cannot get the rare earths nor can they manufacture anything anymore, they will never replace this hardware. These assets are just lost. Iran is decolonizing the region.
English
188
3K
16K
310.7K
parapara⚢
parapara⚢@SuiParabellum·
oh its MESSY messy
parapara⚢ tweet mediaparapara⚢ tweet mediaparapara⚢ tweet mediaparapara⚢ tweet media
English
13
115
3.6K
75.3K