Sigma_Sails

My profile may be a ghost town, but I'm a permanent nuisance in your comment section.

@crossfiregus @BasedMikeLee That's a lot of text for simply saying: "we can't allow legitimate voting otherwise the people who hurt our feelings might win"

To hear some prominent MAGA voices tell it, the marathon Senate debate over the “SAVE America Act” — which has now stretched into the weekend — is an existential one for the Republican Party. If senators don’t figure out a way to pass this bill, they say, Republicans won’t be able to win elections anymore. If the bill isn’t signed into law, they say, GOP voters will just stay home in the 2026 midterm elections. Supporters of the bill will often point to how Americans overwhelmingly support requiring people to show ID to vote. And the new CBS News-YouGov poll shows 80% support that. But when the poll asked about the actual piece of legislation, formerly known as the SAVE Act, support wasn’t anywhere close to those numbers. In fact, just 28% supported it, while 31% opposed it. The other problem for Republicans is that this legislation isn’t as simple as preventing noncitizens from voting. The flipside is that it could make it more difficult for actual citizens to legally vote. (In fact, there’s plenty of evidence and recent history to suggest the latter looms larger.)

I’m now more convinced than ever that those who are most opposed to the SAVE America Act want to cheat by allowing noncitizens to vote The arguments raised by Senate Democrats are making that increasingly clear

@krotrus @Mylovanov @NotoriuosAgain You're clearly not smart enough to come up with a valid rebuttal, keep posting memes to show how ignorant and pathetic you are

@Mylovanov @NotoriuosAgain 🤣🖕🤣

Russian commanders treat their own soldiers like disposable bodies. They force men to fight each other to death, beat and electrocute them, strip them naked and tie them to trees in freezing cold. Wounded men on crutches go straight back into assaults – Daily Mail. 1/

@peppiniello1982 @Mylovanov You have no legitimate argument so you post a meme instead. How pathetic.

@Abcde42000 @front_ukrainian Cope harder loser

@front_ukrainian Americans in the comments talking about war crimes after they have just bombed a school killing 190 children... can't make this shit up.

❗️Full video: 🇺🇦Ukrainian FPV drone operator from the 59th brigade destroys a 🇷🇺Russian Ka-52 on the Pokrovsk direction. After ejection, the crew was eliminated.

@sweetman137 @EricLDaugh And yet you can't explain why it's "voter suppression"

@EricLDaugh These voter ID laws are Jim Crow 2.0. The political climate has changed at this day and time. Now it's the republican party supporting racism and white supremacy. This new law is voter suppression

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Sen. Ted Cruz just MIC DROPPED every Democrat in the Senate who calls SAVE America Act voter ID "JIM CROW 2.0" "I will ADMIT, our Democrat colleagues should be EXPERTS in Jim Crow, because it was Democrat politicians who passed the Jim Crow laws!" 🔥 "It was Democrat politicians who founded the Ku Klux Klan. It was Democrat politicians for decade after decade who enforced discrimination, separate but equal, poll taxes, and a host of other laws designed to prevent African Americans from voting." "But do you know who has rejected their disingenuous claim that photo ID to vote is Jim Crow? The Supreme Court of the United States!" THIS is why we need a talking filibuster for the SAVE America. DEMS HAVE NO ARGUMENT. 🇺🇸

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Typical muslim resorting to violence because you can't win an argument. You can't win in civil discourse, so you turn to violence because your theology can't stand on its own. Jesus is the only way the only truth and the only life.

@sigmasails @mrddmia Shut your b****, I have explained to you what kind of conversation you are having. If you do not belong to any religion, then it is your choice. In Islam, we hold the honor of our Prophet very high. I have explained to you that I will break your mouth,

Eating off the floor. Islamist dogs.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Why are you denying the truth? You're clearly ignoring all the evidence that your prophet Mohammed (Satan be upon him) was nothing more than an illiterate pedophile that had sex with a child.

Brother, now you are making a mistake again. If you want clear evidence, then go and watch the movie The Messenger. It is also shown in it that on the occasion of the conquest of Mecca, the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said that no one should be touched and no one's house should be broken into. This is clear evidence. And what place are you talking about? Speak with evidence.

@weneedyouobiwan @mrddmia "Wanting" isn't "doing." Again, your just being emotional, if you're a man, get out of that emotional headspace and start thinking critically, you wont get anywhere in an argument like this.

@sigmasails @mrddmia Maybe you haven’t realised but your president has been wanting to put boots on the ground, and the bases in the Middle East have soldiers there

@weneedyouobiwan @mrddmia You've yet to produce any reference, link, or proof

@sigmasails @mrddmia Bro I’ve seen it with my eyes I think you’re confused

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Peaceful conquest is a myth. Muhammad explicitly ordered the execution of several people in Mecca, including women and poets who mocked him (Ibn Ishaq p. 551). Your "red line" is just a cover for the violence you already threatened. The text remains: 6 and 9 in Bukhari 5134

You know that when Muhammad (peace be upon him) conquered Mecca, he declared that no one should be touched or anyone's house should be broken into, even though the people of Mecca had oppressed them so much, but when they returned, they did not respond to anyone and did not use violence against anyone.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Stop hiding behind claims of 'misrepresentation'. The text of Bukhari 5134 is a fixed historical record, not a variable number. It clearly states the marriage was at 6 and consummated at 9.

Brother, you are misrepresenting the point, so I will say it wrong, right? The reference you gave me, I have explained the details of this reference to you, now you will change the numbers again and again or change the references, then it will not work like this, if you speak directly, then you will get a direct answer.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia There are no 'two opinions' on the text itself. In Sahih Bukhari 5134, the Arabic explicitly says 'بِنْتُ سِتِّ سِنِينَ' (6 years) and 'بِنْتُ تِسْعِ سِنِينَ' (9 years). You tried to use a different Hadith about fasting to avoid these figures.

@sigmasails @mrddmia I have read my books and I am referring to them. I have given you the translation of the hadith you referred to in Bukhari Sharif, explained it to you, and after looking at it, I have told you what the two opinions are about the hadith you referred to me in.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia You claim peace while threatening to 'break my mouth'—a perfect display of the 'victory through terror' Muhammad bragged about in Bukhari 2977. Your own Sira (Ibn Ishaq p. 106) says Muhammad feared he was demon-possessed (majnun) until a human convinced him otherwise.

After breaking your mouth, it was because our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is our last red line. We have never heard a word about him and we will never hear it. That's why I told you that I will break your mouth. You have to talk like that, we will do it. But Islam will never allow violence. But the Prophet is our last red line.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Reading something four times doesn't change the ink on the page. Use any standard reference (Muhsin Khan or Dar-us-Salam) and look at Bukhari 5134. It's not 'misrepresenting' to quote what is written in black and white. If you can't address the text, you’re just proving my point.

@sigmasails @mrddmia Oh brother, I have read it, I have read it two or four times. You are misrepresenting. You are repeatedly misusing figures. This is not good. Why are you doing it like this? You and I have no discussion about this and you are misrepresenting.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Universal numbers like 5134 aren't 'manipulation'; they're how scholars find text globally. You manually labeled Hadith 5066 as 64 to hide the age of 6 and 9 clearly written in Arabic. If I'm wrong, explain why 5134 exists. You can’t, so you deflect. Done gaslighting.

You are just manipulating words, changing them, changing the numbering. This is not a good thing. You are talking about the state. If you are so keen on talking about Islam, then read the complete Sahih Bukhari and the complete Quran. Then you will understand this matter. Then you can talk to me.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia I’ve provided specific citations from Bukhari 5134, 25, and 2977. You’ve provided indexing errors and deflections. Telling me to go read the books I’m currently quoting to you isn't an argument it’s a white flag. If the text isn't there, prove it. Otherwise, stop the gaslighting

@sigmasails @mrddmia Oh my dear brother, go and read the complete Sahih Bukhari. If you are interested in talking about Islam, then read the Quran and read Sahih Bukhari.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Evasion" is citing a fasting Hadith to hide the text you don't like. Bukhari 5134 Arabic literally says "بِنْتُ سِتِّ سِنِينَ" (6 yrs) and "بِنْتُ تِسْعِ سِنِينَ" (9 yrs). As for terrorism, Bukhari 2977 quotes your Prophet: I have been made victorious with terror. Read your books

@sigmasails @mrddmia Oh my dear brother, I replied to the reference you gave me. It is not written anywhere that he was six years old or nine years old. You are just talking about evasion. Why is Islam associated with terrorism when we have never been involved in this matter?

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia You just claimed Islam never teaches violence, then immediately threatened to 'break my mouth' for quoting your own books. Typical. Even Ibn Ishaq’s Sira (p. 106) records Muhammad feared he was demon-possessed (majnun) after the first revelation. Your threats only prove my point

@sigmasails @mrddmia Our Prophet is our red line, if you do anything beyond that, I will break your mouth.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia Calling facts 'mischief' doesn't erase them. If the descriptions fit, it’s because of your own Sahih sources. Bukhari 5134 confirms the age of 9. Bukhari 25 and 2977 confirm the warmongering. If you find the truth offensive, your issue is with the Hadith, not me.

@sigmasails @mrddmia You are crossing your limits. You are spreading mischief by talking wrongly about our beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Islam. We respect every religion.

@shanisheikh7871 @mrddmia I’m not 'changing' anything; I’m quoting the text you claim to have read. Bukhari 5134, 3894, and 5158 all state the age of 6 and 9. If that's a 'wrong picture,' your issue is with Sahih Bukhari, not me. Stop deflecting with emotion and address the actual scripture. Look up 5134

@sigmasails @mrddmia You are now changing things, changing the facts and figures to what they are, and trying to impose it on me, Maulana, by saying that this is not the case. You are presenting a completely wrong picture of Islam, which is not at all correct.