Sabitlenmiş Tweet
natzpop
502 posts


@mistersquid @1sakEra @kanyestreams1 @Keir_Starmer God now I feel virtually touched unconsensually by seeing this 😭..

English

@1sakEra @kanyestreams1 @Keir_Starmer "Hes talking about ur face mate you look like a pedophile and probably are one"

English

@ironypilled Because no matter the reputation, I decided to post some important information they could hold onto since I was the one with the Nathorix & Parlo logs and Dupe's legal side of the story and ect
English

@simardmusic ok so why were you trying to use the site in the first place
English

@ironypilled Even tho Kiwifarms has an obvious bad reputation, I feel like it was just a right motive to call out that post because the story about Nathorix being in GC with minors apparently 'my fault' was very out of context.
English

@xxsarventexx_90 Nobody deserves to be swatted, no matter the severity of their actions. It is a immoral and unethical move for me to ever endorse or do.
English

@77IsUnavailable @ExposingSchlep @p0lar_rblx It's hilarious for him to claim he would never speak to Nathorix. Very interesting...
English

Parlo didn't you claim to have proof the @ExposingSchlep account was Nathorix? Here he is following you!
@p0lar_rblx



English

@TheWorldsMale @InspectorNuggie It applies to every section. Please do better
English

@simardmusic @InspectorNuggie That was only for Section 7-8. I am not being misinformed because my information comes directly from the uk legislative website
English

@TheWorldsMale @InspectorNuggie This include online communications. You are being misinformed.
English

@simardmusic @InspectorNuggie That is only for sexual activity with a child [Section 7-8 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003]. Section 15A [Sexual communication with a child]'s reasonable belief clause states that the belief must be reasonable. There's no age limitation for that
English

@InspectorNuggie And I forgot to answer the other question, the child did not make that dox. I believe this was made by an ex of his.
English

@InspectorNuggie That dox's been up for quite a while and Dupe lied about his age not just Parlo but to people years back and he had his reasoning of lying about his age. While that I do not justify the act of the child, there was a obvious neglection part from Parlo himself.
English

@InspectorNuggie If anything, the case was dropped for a much different reason in which I have just told a part of a summary to the tweet
English

@InspectorNuggie As I have previously spoken about, there's no case of reasonable belief available under the UK territory as the child was under 13 years old and the adult did not take any actual steps to ask for identification or related to confirm age before engaging sexually.
English

@InspectorNuggie There was no direct way to access the WAR ERA account since it was termed / or I believe forgotten, could be one of them. Regardless, the only thing they'd have access is the story I gave them, the huge document + folder that 77 made, Dupe's story and the logs. Nothing else.
English

@simardmusic If this is a case of alleged grooming of someone under 13 you can bet the police have done everything to get access to the material necessary and came to the conclusion to drop the investigation due to clear and sophisticated catfishing. There's not much more to it.
English






