Simo Hosio
4K posts

Simo Hosio
@simohosio
Optimist Professor in Computer Science & Engineering / 🇫🇮 & 🇯🇵 / Turbocharge your academic output 👉 https://t.co/GagGgjuNGi


one thing I noted was how many professors talked about how the students aren't all thrilled to be using AI, even as they use it. There is a question: what is the point if we can do this?













Asking a student what their paper is about is not a whole other assignment. It’s part of helping students with their work. It’s literally part of teaching. And oral exams teach completely different skills. But I guess you could choose failure instead of a 5 min convo


An Oxford academic has warned that students using AI can obtain a degree without reading any books Katherine Rundell warns that reliance on AI is creating a ‘vast counterfeiting of knowledge’ in universities 👇 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/2…


So this means you expect every author to check every citation and make sure that every citation is real and accurate? What if it's beyond the ability of one of the authors to verify one of the citations because that citation is in a language he doesn't know or concerns technical material he doesn't understand but another author on the paper does?





I’m getting tired of “experts” like this misunderstanding what they’re looking at. LLMs are giant databases of stuff HUMAN BEINGS have done. They are the EXHAUST of humanity. Prompts are database queries into EXISTING DATA. It’s a fuzzy search engine, not intelligence.


@michaelbilleaux To be a successful PI in bio it usually (not always) requires writing 10-20 high profile papers a year, each one with ~80 citations. No bio PI reads each one of these citations cover to cover. That would be absurd.







