Steve Curry

Agreed. It’s not all I “took from that” I hate the entitled, obstructionist Karens w a passion. Also feel really bad for officers having to put up w verbal abuse and expected to be perfect. I also think he should’ve ended it by just giving her the ticket and license back. My opinion ..

@skcurry @BodycamVideos_ That’s what you took from that lol? He probably shouldn’t have raised his voice, but she created the situation for herself. If she’d complied, she would have been given the ticket and been in her way. It’s on her.

Bratty Karen Tries Fleeing Traffic Stop

@Sxnt1_Sxndxval Well done. You totally did the right thing. Should’ve fired him sooner. Life lesson: DO NOT hire friends or relatives.

Ayer despedí a mi mejor amigo de mi empresa y hoy todos nuestros amigos en común me sacaron del grupo de asado porque dicen que "se me subió el poder a la cabeza". Él y yo crecimos juntos; cuando fundé mi agencia, lo contraté para ayudarlo porque llevaba meses desempleado. Le di un sueldo por encima del mercado y total flexibilidad, confiando en que cuidaría mi espalda. Sin embargo, en el último año se volvió el empleado más tóxico: llegaba tarde, entregaba proyectos mediocres y se sentía intocable frente al resto del equipo porque "era el mejor amigo del jefe". Hace una semana, por su negligencia, perdimos al cliente más importante de la empresa, lo que puso en riesgo el sueldo de otras 15 familias. Cuando lo llamé a mi oficina para cuestionarlo, se rió y me dijo: "Relájate, entre amigos nos entendemos, mañana lo arreglamos". En ese momento supe que no podía seguir. Le pedí que recogiera sus cosas y le pagué su liquidación completa, pero él salió diciendo que lo traicioné por dinero. Ahora mi círculo cercano me dice que el dinero va y viene, pero que una amistad de 20 años no tiene precio. Yo opino que ser mi amigo no te da derecho a hundir mi negocio ni a burlarte de mi esfuerzo. ¿Ustedes qué harían? ¿Mantendrían a un amigo incompetente por lealtad o elegirían la integridad de su empresa aunque se queden solos? Los leo en los comentarios.

@BodycamVideos_ To clarify, I’m just talking about 1 part of the video where the cop refused to hand her the license and citation.

@BodycamVideos_ As much as I can’t stand Karen’s and cop abusers, he should’ve given her the ticket and her license back. Yes, she yelled, but he said “lower your voice and I’ll give you your stuff” - escalated the situation.

The world now puts “self” at the centre of everything. No shared goals, no culture, just ME. God has been replaced, by SELF. Empty, valueless, hedonistic self. My truth. Not the truth. Young people are unhappy as a result. Poor education doesn’t teach kids to be proud of their heritage. Poor coaching teaches “we all win when we don’t keep score”. Kids get gifts at others birthday parties. Mothers work, kids are starved for love, attention and support. At a result, they value their ability to work out at 3pm over their job. Or 10 am. Sleep, nutrition - everything is more important than work, don’t you know? “I don’t want a jooooob, like my parents… how boring …” Spoiled, entitled, unappreciative, demanding, self centred, neurotic, isolated, over stimulated, bored, worried, sad, wondering why … Not really their fault, but now they want to quit work, and protest to “save the planet”. We need more plumbers and electricians. …

Tu hijo no tiene ansiedad. Lo que tiene es falta de hambre. Y la culpa es tuya. Ayer despedí a un chico de 22 años a los diez minutos de empezar su periodo de prueba. ¿El motivo? Me preguntó cuántas pausas para el café tenía y si el trabajo era "presencial obligatorio" porque le generaba estrés el transporte público. Le di su mochila y le abrí la puerta. Sin drama. Sin explicaciones. Estamos en 2026 y hemos creado un monstruo: el profesional de cristal. Gente que cree que el sueldo es un derecho de nacimiento y que el esfuerzo es "explotación". Me dicen: —"Es que los tiempos han cambiado, ahora priorizamos el bienestar". Mentira. Priorizáis la mediocridad. Priorizáis el camino fácil mientras el resto del mundo os pasa por la derecha sin pedir permiso. El éxito no es apto para gente que necesita un "espacio seguro" cada vez que recibe una crítica. El dinero no fluye hacia los que esperan que la empresa se adapte a sus traumas infantiles. Si te ofende este texto, felicidades: eres parte del problema. Eres de los que piensan que "ser amable" es más importante que ser eficiente. Eres de los que confunden tener una opinión con tener resultados. He visto a padres arruinarse pagando carreras privadas para que sus hijos terminen llorando en un hilo de X porque su jefe les ha pedido que lleguen puntuales. ¿Quieres ayudar a tu hijo? Deja de protegerlo de la realidad. Deja de validar sus excusas. Enséñale que el mundo es un lugar hostil que desayuna gente con "potencial" y merienda gente con "títulos". La verdadera salud mental es ser capaz de sostener tu vida sobre tus propios hombros sin pedirle a los demás que carguen con tu peso. Aquel chico se fue llamándome "boomer". Yo me volví a mi mesa a trabajar con gente que sabe que, en el barro, las etiquetas de cristal no sirven para nada. El mundo no te debe nada. Aceptarlo es el primer paso para dejar de ser un estorbo.

@eurofounder Don’t feed the trolls. Matthias is a troll. A funny one, but a troll(ish). Haha. My wife was dying, but my real fear was money - haha. But you trolled a lot of Xers.

My wife collapsed in our hotel room in New York today “Call an ambulance, I can’t breathe” she was screaming My heart dropped If she ends up in an American hospital we are financially ruined I went on the Lufthansa app to book a flight back to Frankfurt, but unfortunately pilots are on strike today “Please I’m begging you” she was lying on the floor I sighed and called 911 She is now in surgery as apparently her appendix “almost burst” I am extremely scared This is going to cost us at least $100,000 She could have received much better care, for free, in Germany I will never visit this barbaric country ever again

@Eliakim_Art Cancel her phone service. Then talk.

😥Anonyme : Je pense à DIVORCER tous les jours depuis 2 ans, et je me déteste pour ça. J'ai 37 ans, papa de trois enfants (9, 6 et 3 ans), marié depuis 11 ans. Je travaille à l'usine en 3×8, je rentre crevé, parfois à 5 h du matin, parfois à 13 h, parfois à 21 h. Je ramène l'argent, je paye le loyer, les factures, la bouffe, les vêtements, les activités des enfants, les cadeaux de Noël. Ma femme ne travaille pas. Elle reste à la maison depuis la naissance du deuxième, et je n'ai jamais rien dit. Je trouvais ça normal : les enfants ont besoin d'une maman à temps plein. Mais quand je rentre... rien n'est fait. Les enfants sont sales, les cheveux colles, les vêtements tachés de la veille. 1/2👇🏽

@VigilantFox Obviously, that question was a complete setup. Staged like everything the DEMS do. Couldn’t be a more softball question.

Voter to Pete Buttigieg: “Every day I wake up scared because… I’m waiting for the day that they start banging on doors and taking our trans and our gay friends… to concentration camps.” “I know that there’s nothing you can do about that, but if you could, what would it be?”

@myoldphones @Martina How do you know that? It’s weird, can you read ppls minds?

@skcurry @Martina Trump doesn’t care if someone has to die for his sake. He justifies that automatically.

If this is not a doctored photo, can a blood spatter expert please weigh in??? Sure doesn’t look like a normal wound spatter

@ConcerndBassist @Dzeman39 @Martina Haha Ok sweaty man. You know nothing.

@skcurry @Dzeman39 @Martina TRUMP WAS NOT SHOT

@pookaathelady @PicturesFoIder Imagine if AI could find that for you.

@skcurry @PicturesFoIder I just used ai to find my Amazon package, (which was dropped at the wrong house) based on the picture the delivery driver left. They sent me pictures of every house in my neighborhood with a similar door and porch setup and I actually found the house!

This guy explains how easy it is for creepy internet people to figure out where you are.

@kingloranch12 @PicturesFoIder Yup No response from the moron.

@skcurry @PicturesFoIder no it wouldn’t bro

Misleading at best. Purposely misleading TIME does not rank the people within the Leaders group (or overall) by importance or influence. The presentation order on their site is purely editorial/layout-driven. Per GROK Why the implication feels offIf the graphic suggests Carney outranks Trump in global influence, that's a stretch driven more by TIME's editorial curation and Lagarde's glowing write-up than by measurable reality. As U.S. President in 2026, Trump wields direct control over the world's largest economy, military, and diplomatic apparatus—actions that move markets, alliances, and conflicts on a scale Canada's PM simply doesn't match, regardless of Carney's respected background in central banking or climate finance.TIME's choices often reflect their institutional lens (center-left, globalist-leaning), which can elevate multilateral figures like Carney while still including Trump (as they've done multiple times before). But equating or elevating a Canadian PM above a sitting U.S. President in "influence" ignores basic power asymmetries.The list is subjective signaling, not a serious power ranking. Critics in the original thread were right to flag similar past inclusions as evidence it's more narrative than neutral assessment.

2026 TIME 100 most influential people 🌍 Global Leaders and Policymakers (12) 1．Pope Leo XIV 🇺🇸 🇵🇪 🇻🇦 2．Mark Carney 🇨🇦 3．Mette Frederiksen 🇩🇰 4．Claudia Sheinbaum 🇲🇽 5．Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah 🇳🇦 6．Xi Jinping 🇨🇳 7．Tarique Rahman 🇧🇩 8．Benjamin Netanyahu 🇮🇱 9．Rafael Mariano Grossi 🇦🇷 10．Sanae Takaichi 🇯🇵 11．Balendra Shah 🇳🇵 12．Henna Virkkunen 🇫🇮 U.S. Political Figures and Public Leaders (9) 13．Donald Trump 🇺🇸 14．Gavin Newsom 🇺🇸 15．Marco Rubio 🇺🇸 16．Mark Kelly 🇺🇸 17．Zohran Mamdani 🇺🇸 18．Jacob Frey 🇺🇸 19．Steve Witkoff 🇺🇸 20．Susie Wiles 🇺🇸 21．Dan Caine 🇺🇸 Business, Technology, and AI Leaders (17) 22．Gwynne Shotwell 🇺🇸 23．Dario Amodei 🇺🇸 24．Daniela Amodei 🇺🇸 25．Sundar Pichai 🇮🇳 26．Neal Mohan 🇮🇳 27．Michael Dell 🇺🇸 28．Susan Dell 🇺🇸 29．MrBeast 🇺🇸 30．C.C. Wei 🇹🇼 31．Jeremy Allaire 🇺🇸 32．Sarah Friar 🇬🇧 33．John Furner 🇺🇸 34．David Ellison 🇺🇸 35．Josh D’Amaro 🇺🇸 36．Aliko Dangote 🇳🇬 37．Lip-Bu Tan 🇲🇾 38．Fatih Birol 🇹🇷 Science, Space, and Health Innovators (9) 39．Reid Wiseman 🇺🇸 40．Tony Tyson 🇺🇸 41．Kiran Musunuru 🇺🇸 42．Precious Matsoso 🇿🇦 43．Mari Luz Canaquiri Murayari 🇵🇪 44．Mariangela Hungria 🇧🇷 45．Rebecca Ahrens-Nicklas 🇺🇸 46．Luciano Moreira 🇧🇷 47．Anne-Claire Amprou 🇫🇷 Advocates and Changemakers (10) 48．Shirin Ebadi 🇮🇷 49．Dolores Huerta 🇺🇸 50．Heather Gerken 🇺🇸 51．Kica Matos 🇺🇸 52．Shannon Minter 🇺🇸 53．Lauren Hersh 🇺🇸 54．Mamadou Amadou Ly 🇸🇳 55．Zabib Musa Loro 🇸🇸 56．Rachel Foster 🇺🇸 57．Sabrina Walter 🇺🇸 Entertainers (18) 58．Ben Stiller 🇺🇸 59．Benicio Del Toro 🇵🇷 60．Zoe Saldaña 🇩🇴 61．Ethan Hawke 🇺🇸 62．Kate Hudson 🇺🇸 63．Dakota Johnson 🇺🇸 64．Ranbir Kapoor 🇮🇳 65．Claire Danes 🇺🇸 66．Keke Palmer 🇺🇸 67．Sterling K. Brown 🇺🇸 68．Alan Cumming 🇬🇧 69．Noah Wyle 🇺🇸 70．Anderson .Paak 🇺🇸 71．Jonathan Groff 🇺🇸 72．Wagner Moura 🇧🇷 73．Rhea Seehorn 🇺🇸 74．Jafar Panahi 🇮🇷 75．Nikki Glaser 🇺🇸 Musicians (6) 76．Luke Combs 🇺🇸 77．Coco Jones 🇺🇸 78．Jennie 🇰🇷 79．Hilary Duff 🇺🇸 80．Rauw Alejandro 🇵🇷 81．Noah Kahan 🇺🇸 Athletes (6) 82．Scottie Scheffler 🇺🇸 83．Chloe Kim 🇰🇷 84．Lando Norris 🇬🇧 85．Noah Lyles 🇺🇸 86．Hilary Knight 🇺🇸 87．Alysa Liu 🇺🇸 Visionaries in Fashion, Visual, Literary, and Culinary Arts (13) 88．Ralph Lauren 🇺🇸 89．Victoria Beckham 🇬🇧 90．Matthieu Blazy 🇧🇪 91．Anok Yai 🇸🇸 92．Nancy Silverton 🇺🇸 93．Vikas Khanna 🇮🇳 94．Mashama Bailey 🇺🇸 95．Lynsey Addario 🇺🇸 96．Cao Fei 🇨🇳 97．Tayari Jones 🇺🇸 98．Yiyun Li 🇨🇳 99．Freida McFadden 🇺🇸 100．Walter Hood 🇺🇸

Misleading at best. Purposely misleading TIME does not rank the people within the Leaders group (or overall) by importance or influence. The presentation order on their site is purely editorial/layout-driven. Per GROK Why the implication feels offIf the graphic suggests Carney outranks Trump in global influence, that's a stretch driven more by TIME's editorial curation and Lagarde's glowing write-up than by measurable reality. As U.S. President in 2026, Trump wields direct control over the world's largest economy, military, and diplomatic apparatus—actions that move markets, alliances, and conflicts on a scale Canada's PM simply doesn't match, regardless of Carney's respected background in central banking or climate finance.TIME's choices often reflect their institutional lens (center-left, globalist-leaning), which can elevate multilateral figures like Carney while still including Trump (as they've done multiple times before). But equating or elevating a Canadian PM above a sitting U.S. President in "influence" ignores basic power asymmetries.The list is subjective signaling, not a serious power ranking. Critics in the original thread were right to flag similar past inclusions as evidence it's more narrative than neutral assessment.

Canada’s Mark Carney ranked #2 on the TIME 100… right behind the Pope. 🇨🇦 But hey… whatever you do, don’t let Pierre Poilievre see this. Wouldn’t want him finding out what credibility looks like 🤭

Misleading at best. Purposely misleading TIME does not rank the people within the Leaders group (or overall) by importance or influence. The presentation order on their site is purely editorial/layout-driven. Per GROK Why the implication feels offIf the graphic suggests Carney outranks Trump in global influence, that's a stretch driven more by TIME's editorial curation and Lagarde's glowing write-up than by measurable reality. As U.S. President in 2026, Trump wields direct control over the world's largest economy, military, and diplomatic apparatus—actions that move markets, alliances, and conflicts on a scale Canada's PM simply doesn't match, regardless of Carney's respected background in central banking or climate finance.TIME's choices often reflect their institutional lens (center-left, globalist-leaning), which can elevate multilateral figures like Carney while still including Trump (as they've done multiple times before). But equating or elevating a Canadian PM above a sitting U.S. President in "influence" ignores basic power asymmetries.The list is subjective signaling, not a serious power ranking. Critics in the original thread were right to flag similar past inclusions as evidence it's more narrative than neutral assessment.

🟥 Well, there is no need to say much here, is there? 🙂 The graphic speaks for itself. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Our Prime Minister, Mark Carney, is named by TIME as the 2ND most influential Global leader, after the Pope. We chose the right leader, Canada. 🍁 Despite his critics' constant attempts at misinformation about Carney, the FACTS speak for themselves. This coming decade is going to be the most significant for Canada in a very long time. A positive RENEWAL of our policies, our economy, and our global influence. 🚀 (PS: Trump is down at number 13 on the list. 😌)

@ConcerndBassist @Dzeman39 @Martina Yes, you DO unfortunately. Trump did it, it's wrong. Trump said it, he lied and it's wrong. Trump got shot, must be fake. Simple cult for simpletons. Just like you.

@Dzeman39 @skcurry @Martina Cultist believes obvious lies ☝️

@ConcerndBassist @Martina Wow, repeating the same words totally makes them true. Huh? You know nothing. Sit down.

@skcurry @Martina TRUMP WAS NOT SHOT You idiot.

Amazon's internal metrics said customers waited under 60 seconds for customer service. Jeff Bezos picked up the phone in a meeting and waited more than 10 minutes. The head of customer service had been defending the number. Bezos said "Ok, let's call." He dialed Amazon's 1-800 line on speaker. The room sat there for over ten minutes before a rep answered. The metric didn't survive the meeting. Bezos has a saying: when the data and the anecdotes disagree, the anecdotes are usually right. Metrics don't measure reality. They measure what you designed them to measure. Customer service dashboards commonly filter out abandoned calls, cap hold time at the IVR timeout, and start the clock after the menu tree completes. Every one of those choices pushes the average down. The customers hanging up at minute 9 are not in the denominator. The 60-second number was technically accurate and practically wrong. That call broke through a defended metric in a way no spreadsheet could have. The head of CS had dashboards and a team whose job was to report that number going down quarter over quarter. Bezos had 10 minutes of hold music and a room full of people watching. This is the executive test almost nobody runs. Call your own 1-800 line. Try to buy your own product in incognito. Every senior leader can do it in under 15 minutes. Almost none do, because the dashboards feel like the truth and the dashboards say things are fine. The measurement got redesigned. Wait times actually fell. When your data says you're winning and your customers say you're losing, the customers are right. The data was built by people whose job depends on it going down.

@SatireSquadHQ Haha - good one. I love the deep satire!

New: CBC Poll says 96% of seniors see immigration as a net positive despite crime and healthcare strains. Vancouver — A new CBC poll has found that an overwhelming 96 per cent of Canadians aged 65 and older view immigration as a net positive for the country, even as many express concerns about its impact on public safety and access to care. The survey of seniors comes as Canada continues to grapple with record population growth driven largely by immigration, which has coincided with soaring housing costs and stretched healthcare systems in major cities. Eighty-six per cent of respondents cited declining home values as a top concern, with many emphasizing the importance of maintaining property equity built over decades. “I love the diversity — my cleaner is from the Philippines, my gardener from Mexico,” said one 72-year-old retiree from West Vancouver, who asked not to be named. “Just don’t let anything slow the bidding wars until I flip this place to the next overseas buyer. After that? The kids will figure it out.” While younger Canadians face skyrocketing rents, stagnant wages and fierce competition for entry-level jobs, seniors largely remain supportive of high immigration levels. Many plan to use rising home equity to fund extended winters in warmer climates like Florida or Europe. The poll arrives amid growing national debate over whether Canada’s immigration targets align with infrastructure capacity. Yet for this demographic, the benefits appear to outweigh the strains — at least until the “For Sale” sign goes up. CBC News Poll • April 2026

@ConcerndBassist @Martina You make zero sense. So a random shooter with REAL BULLETS showed up and Trump had a prop ready to go - yeah, good one. So the shooter COULD HAVE killed him, but it was worth the risk, right? Your conspiracy theory requires logic stupider than you. Think before you speak.

@skcurry @Martina Read this carefully, it's just 4 words; TRUMP WAS NOT SHOT