skøgard

1.8K posts

skøgard banner
skøgard

skøgard

@skogard

creator @nuronos, @0xprivateparty, https://t.co/w1msYXLQgO, https://t.co/batr1xlO1Z, https://t.co/4W8rVtGLKJ email: [email protected]

sha256 Katılım Aralık 2020
39 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
Introducing Factoria, the simplest way to do NFT collections without relying on a centralized 3rd party, and without wasting tons of time & money. You no longer have to be a coder to deploy your own contract. Just open Factoria. Add files. And launch. youtube.com/watch?v=B2c1Fk…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
16
21
127
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
If we want anything serious to be built with NFTs, it is the CREATORS who should be able to express exactly how they want their creations to be used and traded. Not some 3rd party hosting providers.
English
0
0
6
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
Going along with marketplace driven solutions is not the answer. And marketplaces like @opensea should stop to think whether what they are doing is the right thing to do for the future of NFTs. It should be obvious this is not the way.
English
1
0
1
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
Legally speaking, NFT creators really have no right to demand Opensea or other marketplaces to respect NFT royalties, because there's nothing on the smart contract that says "respect royalty" to begin with. The solution is to clearly express it onchain: twitter.com/skogard/status…
skøgard@skogard

It's official: Just made a formal EIP draft proposal for the Ricardian NFT Royalty Standard. It's a decentralized and creator-centric way for NFT creators to explicitly attach license to their NFTs, solving many problems such as NFT royalty enforcement. Looking for feedback.

English
1
1
10
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
@optimizoor The reason is: creators are just giving away their contracts without an explicit license. No different from open source code without a license. You can't claim rights to public domain code. The simple solution: onchain license to actually express intent ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-draft-ri…
English
0
0
1
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
@z0r0zzz Agreed. This is the main reason why I stated in the Ricardian NFT royalty enforcement proposal that, the licenseURI should be onchain and not inside metadata. Predictable => Trustless => Composability => Innovation ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-draft-ri…
skøgard tweet media
English
1
2
5
0
ross.wei
ross.wei@z0r0zzz·
A Ricardian Contract, in simple terms, allows parties to legally sign and be bound to the result of the operation of code. It does not require a blockchain or the warranty of immutability. However, these guarantees improve the security of the agreement by making code predictable.
English
3
3
32
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
@z0r0zzz what if it blesses itself :) use this in an NFT contract and point to itself, 10K NFTs, one of them an admin NFT 👍
English
1
0
3
0
ross.wei
ross.wei@z0r0zzz·
@skogard nice twist ~~ can deploy that and bless an NFT from any collection with onchain powers
English
2
0
4
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
If a marketplace disagrees with a licensing model of a certain NFT contract, they can simply decide not to list it, making this market driven instead of centralization. And all of this can be automated onchain because licenseURI() is an onchain method. twitter.com/skogard/status…
skøgard@skogard

It's official: Just made a formal EIP draft proposal for the Ricardian NFT Royalty Standard. It's a decentralized and creator-centric way for NFT creators to explicitly attach license to their NFTs, solving many problems such as NFT royalty enforcement. Looking for feedback.

English
0
1
3
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
The proposal is very simple: "We should be able to attach license to smart contracts" It's not even about just royalties, not about just NFTs. It's about any type of smart contract. Whether this leads to legal enforcement depends on case by case scenario.
English
1
0
3
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
The main point I'm making with Ricardian extension standard is, currently there's nothing to comply to because nobody expressed anything to begin with, just like public domain open source code. Therefore marketplaces are not breaching anything.
English
2
1
3
0
John Palmer
John Palmer@johnpalmer·
starbucks is like a protocol - no borders - configurable - works the same every time - liquidity mining through stars
English
5
0
26
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
the more i think about it, the more i think ricardian contracts can solve a lot of seemingly impossible problems in crypto, and i'm not talking about offchain, i'm talking about fully transparent, programmable, composable license enforcement onchain.
English
0
1
2
0
pseudo 🇺🇦
pseudo 🇺🇦@pseudotheos·
Rollups are effectively just .zip files of valid transactions
English
7
18
175
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
It's official: Just made a formal EIP draft proposal for the Ricardian NFT Royalty Standard. It's a decentralized and creator-centric way for NFT creators to explicitly attach license to their NFTs, solving many problems such as NFT royalty enforcement. Looking for feedback.
skøgard tweet media
English
1
10
37
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
and if it happens, it will happen overnight.
English
0
0
1
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
the biggest hypothetical threat until now has been quantum computing. but might even be able to achieve without it. of course, if combined with quantum computing could result in much more unexpected results.
English
1
0
1
0
skøgard
skøgard@skogard·
the core assumption of crypto is that the underlying algo (ECDSA, Ed25519, etc) won't break. but with all the progress being made in AI, i wonder if some clever AI scheme can break everything overnight. cryptocurrency, nfts, blockchains, digital signature, everything.
English
1
0
4
0

Keşfet

@opensea @optimizoor @z0r0zzz @johnpalmer @pseudotheos @IPFS @elonmusk @BarackObama