आयुष भारत

11.4K posts

आयुष भारत banner
आयुष भारत

आयुष भारत

@sleepyayush

Graduate(Engineering), #MaleRightActivist https://t.co/fBgQ4LUXnO

HP Katılım Aralık 2023
382 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Incognito
Incognito@Incognito_qfs·
Nine cousins in Pakistan married each other's sisters in Pakistan. Basically, everyone married their sisters and celebrated. Another man from Pakistan commented that he will marry his sister after she passes 8th standard. In Pakistan, they like to keep it in the family because retardness should never go out of family. Pakistan is beyond redemption at this stage.
Incognito tweet media
English
241
1.8K
7.3K
320.7K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
A former mayor and her rapist son, who worked together to stall police after they turned up at their home to question him about the attack, have been jailed. Naheed Ejaz, 61, was Bracknell Forest Council's first Muslim mayor when she was selected in May 2023 but quit her role as a Labour councillor in October 2024. She was jailed for three years after being found guilty of perverting the course of justice following a trial at Winchester Crown Court. Diwas Khan, 41, admitted perverting the course of justice and was found guilty of the rape of a 15-year old girl in summer 2024. He was given a jail sentence of 12 years. Only one community covers for child rapists like this, every single time!
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
148
1.8K
7.4K
73.7K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Visegrád 24
Visegrád 24@visegrad24·
BREAKING: An illegal Iraqi asylum seeker who pushed a 16-year-old Ukrainian refugee, Liana K., in front of a moving freight train in Germany has avoided jail. A court ruled that the 31-year-old Muhammed A. is not criminally responsible due to severe paranoid schizophrenia and ordered him to be placed permanently in a psychiatric facility. 🇩🇪
Visegrád 24 tweet media
English
277
760
3.4K
249.9K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Deepak Sharma
Deepak Sharma@SonOfBharat7·
शाबाशी दो इन बेटियों के माँ बाप को 🖐️ जो 3 हिंदू लड़कियां शुभम सोनी नाम के जिहादी के साथ ग़ाज़ियाबाद की एक सोसाइटी में फ्लैट नं. E-902 में रहती हैं रात में मारपीट ग़ालियों की आवाज आई तो पड़ोसिओं ने पुलिस बुला ली.. पता चला वो शुभम सोनी नहीं बल्कि खुश नसीब शेख है... और लम्बे समय से तीनों लड़कियों के साथ रह रहा था प्लीज़ कोई ये मत कहना इन हिंदू लड़कियों को कुछ पता नहीं था... ये जिहाद समाज के लिए हो सकता पर इन लड़कियों के साथ जो हो रहा था वो इनकी गन्दी परवरिश और घटिया लापरवाह माँ बाप की वजह से था ✍️ आपका क्या कहना हैं ?
हिन्दी
211
5.1K
10.1K
365.5K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Sann
Sann@san_x_m·
Her name was Priyadarshini Mattoo. She was 25 years old. A Kashmiri Pandit who had fled militancy in Srinagar with her family and rebuilt her life in Delhi. She was in the final semester of her LLB at Delhi University’s Campus Law Centre. Her senior in college was a man named Santosh Kumar Singh. His father was JP Singh, a senior IPS officer who would go on to become Joint Commissioner of Delhi Police. Santosh became obsessed with Priyadarshini. She rejected him. He began stalking her. She filed FIR after FIR. The police did nothing. Her father went to the university. The university did nothing. She was eventually given a personal security officer. The stalking continued anyway. On the morning of January 23, 1996, her security officer did not show up for duty. Santosh knocked on the door of her uncle’s house in Vasant Kunj where she was staying. A servant saw him enter. What followed took less than an hour. She was found under her bed. Strangled with an electric wire. Her face battered beyond recognition with a motorcycle helmet. She had 19 injuries on her body. DNA evidence linked Santosh directly to the crime. His fractured helmet visor was recovered. Witnesses placed him at the scene. In 1999, Additional Sessions Judge GP Thareja delivered his verdict. He said in open court I am convinced he is the man who committed the crime. Then he acquitted him. He said the CBI had fabricated the DNA evidence. He gave Santosh the benefit of the doubt. The Delhi High Court later called this verdict a perverse approach that murdered justice and shocked the judicial conscience. It took public outrage, media pressure and her aged father appearing on television for years before the High Court took up the appeal in 2006. Within 42 days, the High Court convicted Santosh and sentenced him to death. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction in 2010 but reduced the sentence to life imprisonment. He has since been granted multiple paroles. In 2019, he was given parole to appear for his LLM examination. The man who raped and murdered Priyadarshini Mattoo is studying law in prison. Her father fought for 10 years to get a conviction the judge already had in his hands in 1999. The verdict said police were reluctant to act on her complaints because Santosh’s father was a senior officer. It said junior staff do not react to complaints against the relatives of their fraternity. She filed FIR after FIR. Nobody moved. Not until she was dead. Follow for real stories India never makes headlines about.
Sann tweet media
English
261
2.7K
6.6K
255.3K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs
A SC bench led by Justice BV Nagarathna questioned a widow who lodged a rape case against her live in partner with whom she stayed in consensual relationship for years and even had a child. As usual, Feminist lobbies started doing Vidhwa Vilap after this
English
9
136
447
11.7K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Nupur J Sharma
Nupur J Sharma@UnSubtleDesi·
I was interrogated for hours at the behest of Mamata Banerjee and Abhishek Banerjee. My old father was threatened. My husband was threatened. TMC goons called up and listed my daughter’s school routine to intimidate. I was driven away. This seems like a day to light a cigar.
ANI@ANI

#WATCH | Kolkata: West Bengal Chief Minister and TMC candidate from Bhabanipur Assembly constituency, Mamata Banerjee, says, "Look how our worker was beaten up at night. Just look at this atrocity. What kind of hooliganism is going on? Voting does not happen like this. Voting happens peacefully. It is a festival of democracy. But they have completely ruined it. The intention is very clear that the BJP wants to forcefully rig the election. Our workers and people are ready to die, but they will not leave the place."

English
207
4K
13.5K
274.8K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj@DeepikaBhardwaj·
Husband Wife decide to divorce by Mutual Consent Alimony of 20 Lacs agreed Husband pays 4 Lacs as first installment. Wife expires after that. Remaining 16 Lacs isn't paid Wife's mother moves court to get the money Allahabad High Court says she's entitled to it. Allowed
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj tweet media
English
334
594
1.7K
110.3K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
कुशल मेहरा
I had covered this case in my book Blasphemy. I had used this very case as an example of political privilege in India. I had predicted nothing will happen to Mr. Thakur. But if the same words are uttered by an average Indian they will go to jail. I think this judgment is sound because hate speech should also be legal in my view. But in India everyone uses convoluted logic. An average citizen would simply not get away like Mr Anurag Thakur or a Udaynidhi Stalin get away. The asymmetrical reality is very much in our face. "No Hate Speech Offence Made Out Against Anurag Thakur & Parvesh Verma : Supreme Court In Brinda Karat's Plea" livelaw.in/top-stories/su… livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
English
5
16
95
4.8K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Bar and Bench
Bar and Bench@barandbench·
Serving army officer argues own divorce case before Supreme Court: Wife: I am not here against divorce (divorce has already been granted). I am challenging the remarks and findings on cruelty and desertion made against me by the family court and high court. They may be expunged. Husband: I had to fight 10 years to get my parents’ name out, my sister’s name out and my name out from the allegations she had made against me and now she wants that they be omitted. Please see the allegations which were put on me. First allegation, trying to convert her religion, trying to murder her, sexual determination and gender bias, pressurising her to terminate pregnancy, harassment for dowry, demanding dowry, stalking, threatening with weapon… I had to fight 10 years to get my name cleared from this. Till date they have taken out about 57 lakhs from me. Court: they have taken out means what? It’s according to the family court’s order. Husband: in another matter they have to return 11.7 lakhs to me. Court: that’s a different matter, you have got recourse to the courts for that. Husband: the maintenance which they have taken from me is on a false affidavit. They have misled the family court. She has filed two contradicting affidavits. Court: contradicting doesn’t mean that it’s false. Court: What were the allegations in the divorce suit? Wife: cruelty in terms of not staying with him in his place of work, desertion that I did not go with my daughter to his house and instead I went to my parents’ house. I wanted to open my dental clinic in Ahmedabad has been used against me. Saying that I don’t want to join my husband in his place of work, knowing that he’s an army man. Court: yes, wife having own work, there’s nothing wrong with that. Court to husband: are you standing the risk of getting this judgement of high court reversed? [the judgement which had granted divorce based on wife’s cruelty]. We don’t think a single allegation in your petition amounts to cruelty, if you seek our opinion. Do you want to take that risk? Husband: the charges that were put on me… Court: let things be over. Forget about the past and move on. That’s more advisable for you. Husband: it took me 10 years to get my name cleared from the charges which she had put against me. Court: you also dragged her here till Supreme Court. (The husband has filed a perjury case against the wife for the alleged contradictory affidavits) The court ultimately reserved its order in the case.
Bar and Bench tweet media
English
288
238
769
208.7K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj@DeepikaBhardwaj·
A MURDERED MAN HAS LESS SERIOUSNESS IN EYES OF LAW THAN WORDS OF A WOMAN I feel totally lost today. Over the last few years, I have personally worked with men who are victims of #falserape cases who spent anything from 5 months to 5 years in false rape cases. No matter how many proofs they had of their innocence, courts did not grant them bail merely because "allegations" & "charges" against them were serious as recorded in their bail rejection orders BUT I am seeing women being granted bail within days or months even when they played an active role in the death of a man whether in abetment to suicide cases or even MURDERS !!! WHAT EQUALITY IS THIS? NOT EVEN 1 YEAR IN JAIL !!!?
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj tweet media
English
131
1.3K
3.4K
69.8K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs
Gems of Judiciary: Mumbai High Court gave date after 20 years to the 90 years old litigant. Milord wanted to close the defamation suit with an unconditional apology by the respondent but the 90 years old plaintiff wanted to pursue the case on merit. After that angry Judge adjourned the matter till 2046. Chances are good that the plaintiff will not be alive till then. Justice Served or Justice will be Due Forever?
NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs tweet media
English
98
475
1K
30.5K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Scam Altman and Greg Stockman stole a charity. Full stop. Greg got tens of billions of stock for himself and Scam got dozens of OpenAI side deals with a piece of the action for himself, Y Combinator style. After this lawsuit, Scam will also be awarded tens of billions in stock directly. The fundamental question is simply this: Do you want to set legal precedent in the United States that it is ok to loot a charity? If so, you undermine all charitable giving in the United States forever. I could have started OpenAI as a for-profit corporation. Instead, I started it, funded it, recruited critical talent and taught them everything I know about how to make a startup successful FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD. Then they stole the charity.
X Freeze@XFreeze

Interesting how it works Elon puts up his own money, rounds up the absolute best AI talent on the planet, leverages every connection he has to secure serious resources, and launches OpenAI in 2015 as a pure non-profit explicitly created to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, with zero profit motive and open research Then the “team” decides they want the bag They push Elon out, take control, and quietly flip the entire thing into a for-profit machine All while preaching the same sanctimonious lines on repeat: “We’re still mission-driven!” “AI for the good of humanity!” “We’d never abandon our principles!” The ultimate betrayal: Elon got zero equity. Not a single share. He funded it. He built the foundation. He got nothing while they turned his non-profit into their personal cash cow This is the level of betrayal and hypocrisy we’re dealing with And for the record.... this lawsuit doesn’t put a single penny in Elon’s pocket. Any win goes straight back to the non-profit to restore the exact mission he founded

English
10.6K
31.9K
187K
37.2M
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Scam Altman didn’t tell the OpenAI board that he OWNED the OpenAI Startup Fund. Altman lied in congressional testimony that he didn’t have financial gain from OpenAI.
DogeDesigner@cb_doge

Ex-board member of OpenAI calls Sam Altman a liar. He lied to the board for years, hid ChatGPT launch, lied about owning Startup Fund, falsified safety info, and lied to oust her after her paper. Board lost all trust → fired him. Sam Altman is a liar.

English
3.7K
26K
115.4K
15M
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Comman Man
Comman Man@CommanMan777589·
Bharat is a Banana republic Image 1- Gautam Khattar arrested within 48 hours for stating facts Image 2- Nida Khan no arrest till today Hindu’s are being fooled on a daily basis!!
Comman Man tweet mediaComman Man tweet media
English
260
8.9K
20.9K
121K
आयुष भारत retweetledi
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj
Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj@DeepikaBhardwaj·
In the last 2 weeks I have learnt of 3 so called rape cases where Supreme Court has sent these cases for "MEDIATION" CASE 1: Woman stole jewellery from house of neighbours. When he complained she retaliated with rape case. She moved Supreme Court after anticipatory bail was rejected even by HC. Supreme Court sent the case for "mediation" Case 2 : Married woman in consensual relationship with married man. Man has reached Supreme Court for anticipatory bail. Case sent for "mediation" Case 3 : Woman & Man in live-in relationship. Child born out of the relationship. Woman then filed rape case alleging false promise of marriage. SC sends the case for "mediation" AFTER MOCKERY OF 498A NOW RAPE LAWS ARE BEING MOCKED A Heinous crime like rape will now be mediated which basically means monetary settlement or demands of woman being met whatever it is. God save this country
English
21
177
594
18.2K