Sean McBride
249 posts
@Zeshankenzo Hearts players wouldn’t have been in the position to assault Celtic fans if the Celtic fans hadn’t invaded to pitch…if I’m at work and some moron runs at me I can guarantee you it’s him being taken out before me.
English
@ghostofSanFran Lost 4/5 games and only beat Falkirk, where do yous get the confidence from 🤣
English
@Ricky1349516041 @UranusHasRings What a strange man you are 🤣 🏴 you probably work and socialise with catholics every day in life, maybe go outside, touch some grass and see the real world ya goblin
English
@UranusHasRings 🎯we’ll hear all the usual hysteria from the catholic/SNP seal clapping football supporters in the run up to the games and I include the Scottish media in that prancing around in kilts and reciting William Wallace fkn rhetorical pish…null points and taxi for Clarke for me..
English
When did “Scotland The Brave” become the land of faggots?!?
Check out these fannies 👇👇👇
English
3-0 win awarded to Hearts & 20 point deduction going into next season will do👍🏼
Daily Record Sport@Record_Sport
🆕 Celtic have triggered points deduction scenario claims ex SFA chief as pitch invasion punishments explored 🍀🚨 dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football…
English
@ottawascot 🤣🤣 fair enough mate
sadly I wouldn’t be surprised, I hope not but like all clubs there are some scumbags who ruin it for the majority
English
@smcb091220 Wean not wain. Because the child that has been weaned, also short for wee-ane. Wain is a horse drawn wagon.
Aye we'll see when the police reports come out. Id wager there is at least one assault charge from Celtic Park.
English
If Hearts players weren't assaulted what's the lad in a black hoodie and shorts doing?
English
@ottawascot Mate I’ve got wains to feed and shit to get done, I’d love to sit and dispute all day, let’s just see what the outcome is will we, I don’t think this specific one is the assault you claim it to be, but I have a feeling more footage me be released and shit will come out
English
@smcb091220 Im not trying to find it. Ive gone out of my way to say Scots law is based on precedent and doesnt have legistlation/charges for every specific infraction. They are umbrellaed under precedent and the Scot Gov defines "common assault" as Ive shown it to you many times
English
@ottawascot Because your trying to find specific Scottish government legislation, which just disintegrates the dispute, anyway have a nice Sunday, let’s see what comes out, again I condemn some Celtic fans behaviour to be clear regardless if it’s assault or just goading, ugly scenes
English
@smcb091220 Why do you keep mentioning Sovereign citizen bullshit were not talking about the US ffs. Such a weird deflection.
Anyways, your example is great and it very well could fall under that. Id argue the contact seen surpasses that into assault, as defined under common law.
English
This is an absolute travesty. 3 Celtic players clearly in an offside position.
VAR didn't even look at it.
This is just full blown cheating.
English
@ottawascot Yes I think your being disingenuous, I think he sticks the fingers up and jumps out the way of the incoming player 🤷♂️ I say let the courts decide not two guys on X
English
@smcb091220 The lad in shorts 100% lunges. And you accuae me of being disingenuous? Fucking hell
x.com/i/status/20558…
Sᴛᴜᴀʀᴛ ᴍᴀᴄ@ottawascot
If Hearts players weren't assaulted what's the lad in a black hoodie and shorts doing?
English
@ottawascot To be specific it would come under: Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 section 38 which is law, please mate ease of the sovereign citizen narrative it really descents this into stupidly, of course there are specific laws to this
English
@smcb091220 What specific Scots laws or precedent are you basing this off of?
English
@ottawascot we have courts to determine this, I personally feel the guy is goading and giving hearts players verbals, what I can observe is he does not draw back to punch, he does not grab, lunge or strike in the direction, he jumps out of the way of the hearts players and moves on
English
@smcb091220 You're saying it wouldn't meet the classification of assault
What specific Scots laws or precedent are you basing this off of?
English
@ottawascot Honestly mate, “Sovereign citizen pish”; the official charge is “assault”; I can see in the change of argument you have came to that conclusion finally and now are splitting hairs, regardless being it to your video, you are stretching if your claiming that’s what occurs here
English
@smcb091220 See Scots Law isnt covered by legislation like other places, much if it is based on precedent. So if the Scot government/courts have shown there is a precedent to classify crimes as "common assault" then it is factual to say that common assault exists under Scots law.
English
@ottawascot Yes but you do realise that classifications are not actual laws right? Your claiming this guy has caused an “assault”; im arguing that wouldn’t meet the “classification of assault”; it is more likely threatening and abusive behaviour charges at worst if not completely tossed
English
@smcb091220 Where did I mention charge? I said under Scots law that's how its classified. There are many laws that are covered by umbrella laws. The Scots Gov clearly classified Common Assault as its own category
English
@ottawascot Mate your now posting definition criteria, the charge is “assault” and I think your going down a rabbit hole, but please read the criteria and determine if you think it applies to the video you’ve originally posted, the term common is a word to split it from serious or sexual etc
English
@smcb091220 Infact under Scots Law there are various forms of Common Assault as defined by law. Including
English
@ottawascot Hahahah right now I’m certain you’re not reading what your posting, there is no charge of a common assault, just an assault, there is however a charge of serious assault, please I’m trying to be respectful as possible but read what you post and take it in
English
@smcb091220 Best tell the Scot Gov then. As they clearly distinguish between "serious assault" and "common assault"
English
@ottawascot Did you read the article you’ve just posted 🤣 “the act of assault”; there is no common assault charge, there is only an “assault charge” I’m not sure how your not getting this, the definition your showing is basically how serious the courts deem it and no goading is not a form
English
@smcb091220 It not a lot of nothing. Its the law.
Here is the official Scottish government defintion. Remember, you claimed "common assault" doesn't exist under Scots law...
English
@ottawascot Again common assault is not a charge in Scotland you can look this up, there are different detentions of “common” assaults either with or without injury, but it’s an assault charge non the less this does not meet the criteria for pf charges
English
@ottawascot There is no such charge in Scot’s law as a common assault mate that’s English, I appreciate the case your making but I feel the Celtic fans Lawyer should the case be made, would have a field day and at worst he would be charged with threatening behaviour
English
@smcb091220 Disagree. Approaching someone with raised fists absolutely constitutes assault, especially if the person is in fear of their safety, which from their response, is clearly the case on the video
English