Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)

23.3K posts

Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu) banner
Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)

Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)

@SoilManDan

I read dirt. Dirt is everywhere, pay more attention! #Geoarchaeology Proud stepdad and stepgramps.

Katılım Mayıs 2014
1.5K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)
Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)@SoilManDan·
Graham tried to be slippery, but: 1) All of his "fingerprints" are things that archaeologists have studied, he just disagrees with the conclusion. 2) If he's referring to unexplored areas, he hasn't studied those either. Nobody has, that's the point.
clarky@MalClarky1

@xashtreex @DeDunkingPast @SoilManDan In what “they” (mainstream) have investigated. It’s that simple. Graham Hancock doesn't say there is no evidence, but he has admitted that there is no direct archaeological evidence for his theory in the areas currently studied by mainstream scientists.

English
2
3
23
1.4K
Timothy Alberino
Timothy Alberino@TimothyAlberino·
Be careful with the UAP files. There may be some intentionally dubious material (especially from AARO) mixed in with the legitimate stuff to poison the whole batch.
English
42
39
488
20.8K
Abel Babel
Abel Babel@babel91042·
@Gnosisinformant @4gottnHistory @MattBeallPod Bruh the mortar samples were taken from exactly the outer casing stones that a repair would have newly mortared into place, and the wood is famously too old. Damn right I'm guessing maybe it's repairs.
English
3
0
2
74
Forgotten History
Forgotten History@4gottnHistory·
@Gnosisinformant you went on @MattBeallPod and said the Merer Papyrus is the smoking gun that proves the pyramids were built by Khufu, but in reality, it doesn’t. If we read what it actually says, it describes workers transporting stone by boat during Khufu’s reign. That’s important evidence… but it does NOT explain: 📍How the Great Pyramid was constructed, it says nothing about that. 📍How 80-ton granite beams were lifted. 📍How hard stone was cut with such precision. 📍Or how millions of blocks were aligned so accurately. Moving stone and explaining the construction of the Great Pyramid are two very different things. For all we know Khufu found the pyramid and was just repairing it. So, while it is a very important papyrus, calling it a smoking gun is a stretch too far for me. Having said that, it was a great debate, brother 🔥
Forgotten History tweet media
English
7
0
15
3.5K
crossetteframes
crossetteframes@Hillbillyflyer·
@DrHughT @4gottn_History Because it puts in most people's head the image of a caveman. Which most people don't actually believe existed- myself included. The term stinks of failed evolutionary theory and people reject it outright as nonsense. Say nomadic tribes and there's no conflict. Nomads farm.
Greenwood, AR 🇺🇸 English
2
0
1
189
William Smith
William Smith@4gottn_History·
Göbekli Tepe wasn't built by hunter-gatherers in my opinion.
William Smith tweet media
English
14
1
36
10.2K
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak@Gnosisinformant·
Watch the delusion happen in real time.. Forgotten History is shown PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that shows us WHEN and WHERE and by WHO the Pyramids were built for. But his delusional brain, which is completely captured by his dogmatic worldview, is now looking for ANYTHING to somehow negate this. So he brings up how the papyri doesn't tell us HOW they blocks were lifted. As if this somehow negates the data of the papyrus and makes it void. But wait.. If we establish WHEN and WHO built the pyramids, then doesn't that sort of destory the idea that they were built with advanced secret technology if we know what 4th dynasty Egyptian capabilites were? And doesn't he at least have to throw away that it was built by 10,000 BCE survivors of the ancient advanced Atlanteans? Make it make sense.
Forgotten History@4gottnHistory

@Gnosisinformant you went on @MattBeallPod and said the Merer Papyrus is the smoking gun that proves the pyramids were built by Khufu, but in reality, it doesn’t. If we read what it actually says, it describes workers transporting stone by boat during Khufu’s reign. That’s important evidence… but it does NOT explain: 📍How the Great Pyramid was constructed, it says nothing about that. 📍How 80-ton granite beams were lifted. 📍How hard stone was cut with such precision. 📍Or how millions of blocks were aligned so accurately. Moving stone and explaining the construction of the Great Pyramid are two very different things. For all we know Khufu found the pyramid and was just repairing it. So, while it is a very important papyrus, calling it a smoking gun is a stretch too far for me. Having said that, it was a great debate, brother 🔥

English
11
6
32
9.3K
Thomas Portail
Thomas Portail@Thomas_dupes·
@SoilManDan @Gnosisinformant Markings that only Vyse discovered in a discharge chamber similar to some other chambers already discovered in which there were none, with wrong spelling, same wrong spelling you could find in the book this archeologist had… knowing that he had to find smthing to get credits…
English
2
0
0
14
Thomas Portail
Thomas Portail@Thomas_dupes·
@SoilManDan @Gnosisinformant I don’t know where you are from but here in France we had to rebuild a part of Notre Dame de Paris Cathedral. If there were no markings inside and 4000 y later someone find a 2020 document saying stones were brought to the cathedral, it doesn’t mean that it was to build it.
English
2
0
0
14
Thomas Portail
Thomas Portail@Thomas_dupes·
@Gnosisinformant Do you agree that documenting carrying stones under Khufu’s reign doesn’t mean that these stones were dedicated to build the great pyramid?
English
2
0
0
16
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak@Gnosisinformant·
I like Matt. He’s a rock star for his contributions to excavating the Pyramid right now. He’s also a real nice guy and genuine in my opinion. But it is very bizarre to me how easily these primary sources are available to myself as an amateur yet so many on the pseudo side are clueless of these major primary sources. And they wonder why Egyptologists are so keen on the data being what it is, yet they act surprised when you show them Merer papyrus or the inscriptions/grafiti etc. So many people I know will admit they don’t know much (which is fine) but then have strong opinions about why scholars are wrong. It’s very strange. I can’t believe neither Matt or Dan were aware of the Merer papyrus’ contents being so clear that they took blocks from the quarry to the pyramid. And that it clearly mentions Khufu’s Pyramid (With that determitive pyramid hieroglyph). That should be household universal knowledge but it’s not.
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak tweet media
English
8
3
36
1.6K
Justine “That Woman” Warren
Justine “That Woman” Warren@adancingferret·
Ok, what the hell, I’m tired from driving and supply runs and setting up camp and snark needs an outlet, so I’ll livetweet watching the debate between @Gnosisinformant and @DeDunkingPast hosted by Matt Beall @MBeallX I still say it’s a shame Dan won’t face an actual archaeologist and that this wasn’t livestreamed, but whatever
English
3
3
23
1.1K
Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu) retweetledi
Dr. Max Fomitchev-Zamilov
Dr. Max Fomitchev-Zamilov@DrZamilov·
If you, like me, have been sold on UnchartedX fairytales, this expose by' Professor Dave' would be a rude awakening. While I strongly dislike Dave's aggressive and deeply disrespectful approach toward those he roasts, he is, factually, spot on. I am still reeling from the fact that virtually everything Ben says is factually inaccurate. Yet he presents it so eloquently that you instantly believe it. This is Ben's greatest talent: storytelling. I only wish he wrote fiction instead - he would have sold a million copies, and I would have bought all his books and had them autographed. Yet realizing that he misleads on purpose is a heavy feeling, the one my heart will take a long time to recover from. I am heartbroken, Ben. I thought you were better than this. youtube.com/watch?v=hSjkba…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
19
6
24
14K
Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)
Dirty Dan the Soil Man (Fallu)@SoilManDan·
@adancingferret I’ll also point out that Colin Reader’s interpretation, which is what Dan refers to, has been criticized (by geologists) because it requires a type of consistent sheet flow that simply doesn’t happen over heavily jointed soft limestone like at Giza.
English
0
0
1
12
Justine “That Woman” Warren
Justine “That Woman” Warren@adancingferret·
Re the Sphinx and water: also consider the annual flood of the Nile prior to the construction of the Aswan Dam, the actual water table, that it DOES occasionally rain, that sand (as periodically covered the body) does weird things with water, and that, again, there is more to consider in regards to dating and analysis of the limestone and construction than just what *looks* to a vertebrate paleontologist like evidence of flooding
English
2
0
4
184
Justine “That Woman” Warren
Justine “That Woman” Warren@adancingferret·
Um, the thing is, Dan, Tutankhamun WASN’T SUCCESSFULLY ERASED! Despite the attempt, clues remained to modern times! Also, there’s huge amounts of discussion of High, Middle, Low chronologies in Egypt I guess Dan has missed those too
English
2
0
8
186
Graham Hancock
Graham Hancock@Graham__Hancock·
A shout out for Ed Barnhart @ArchaeologistEd who appeared with me at the Mayan site of Palenque in Episode 6 of Season 2 of my Netflix series Ancient Apocalypse. Ed and I disagree about many things but it's always constructive and based on mutual respect. I highly recommend his YouTube channel for some excellent thought-provoking content. @Ed_Barnhart" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@Ed_Barnhart
English
20
35
470
37.2K
Grier
Grier@groyperexplorer·
@Graham__Hancock @ArchaeologistEd Dr. Ed is how all academic archeologists should model themselves with class and respect. It’s unfortunate most of them are so toxic. Especially one in particular
English
2
0
6
284
Zeen Laqueefa
Zeen Laqueefa@ZLaqueefa·
@FlintDibble @Graham__Hancock @ArchaeologistEd Alluding to Graham being a Nazi white Supremist, in a mainstream media publication, is an even better way to lose respect before you meet someone. Dibble is omitting he attacked Graham first, in a very personal and disrespectful manner. Limp Dribble is as slippery as they get.
English
2
0
1
122
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺
Flint Dibble 🍖🏺@FlintDibble·
@Graham__Hancock @ArchaeologistEd We could've had a relationship of mutual respect, if you hadn't accused me of manipulating the media against you, when nobody knew who I was during the debate Oh, and repeatedly accusing me of lying These are how respect breaks down
English
13
2
68
1.5K

Keşfet

@TimothyAlberino @babel91042 @Gnosisinformant @4gottnHistory @MattBeallPod @Hillbillyflyer @DrHughT @4gottn_History