BS enjoyer

Show these "reliable sources m" right now. Any notable translator, or anthropologist worst their salt always tends to distinctify that lolicon in Otaku sub-cultures is not the moral, logical nor social equivalent to a "pedophile" or "Shõniseiai-sha" (小兒性愛者) Its not depicting children cus chuldren are real individuals, unless a real person is being used as reference material its not a depiction of said individual. Also, please stop using google, Google is not a source. This warning is based on user input off of location data with common search terms and claims spread weather true or not. It's not proof the material is actually illegal, or considered the same as csem. Here, I use my state and it gives the warning cus the state puts in lots of misinfo about it, put it into a random country as a control? Sure you get the debunked Scholars Bank article, but not the warning, put it into Japan where misinformation about this is minimal? Nothing at all of note lol