john

400 posts

john banner
john

john

@speakluve

bruh why you stalking me

Katılım Haziran 2014
87 Takip Edilen13 Takipçiler
Vesil
Vesil@TexGT1·
@zogratwitch @GrimisS @eron_wolf @riotgames i never played riot dogshit games for the record. i use linux & never bother with an online that has a kernel anticheat. one day you retards tolerating obvious corporate over reach will get everything thats coming to you. & i wont have a lick of sympathy for ppl like you.
English
3
0
2
440
Riot Games
Riot Games@riotgames·
Well, that escalated quickly. There’s been a wave of claims by cheaters about Vanguard “bricking” their PCs, so let’s clear that up: Vanguard does not damage hardware or disable your devices. The photo we posted is a picture of cheat hardware devices that are sold explicitly for cheating in VALORANT (not normal PCs or PC components). Through our latest updates, Vanguard now makes those devices worthless for VAL, but does not in any way brick PCs or PC components or PC software. Our latest update enforces standard platform security features, like the Input-Output Memory Management Unit (IOMMU), on accounts identified as using Direct Memory Access (DMA) cheating devices. These protections are already part of modern systems and when enabled, they block DMA cheat devices (such as those shown in the photo) from accessing memory in downstream applications, like our games. If a cheat setup continues attempting to cheat after those protections are enabled, the system may generate hardware faults or instability. This is expected behavior under IOMMU when attempts are made to read protected memory. Disabling IOMMU allows the cheat device to function again, but IOMMU will still be required to play our games. This means the cheat device won’t work with our games, but your PC isn’t “bricked.” We would not, and cannot, impact your PC’s functionality in any other fashion. This functionality only applies to systems attempting to use DMA cheat devices, and players who are not using DMA-based cheat setups are not affected. We’ll keep investing in anti-cheat to protect competitive integrity, and we’ll keep being as transparent as possible about how those systems work.
Riot Games@riotgames

congrats to the owners of a brand new $6k paperweight

English
1.6K
1.6K
31K
11.4M
john
john@speakluve·
@GrantH556692 @baby__frog @riotgames "hiccup in the hardware" name 1 example of this happening? even if the hypothetical COULD be reason for worry, no one is in real danger... For now, this just prevents cheaters. If there ever is a "hiccup" THEN we can start worrying and boycot and whatnot.
English
5
0
47
3.1K
Grant H
Grant H@GrantH556692·
@baby__frog @riotgames It’s not about the cheaters. It’s about the company being able to over step so deeply into your system. Also what if there’s just a hiccup in the hardware and your account gets flagged for cheating? Get fucked then I guess
English
12
2
184
14.7K
Eron Wolf
Eron Wolf@eron_wolf·
It doesn't matter. Everyone should be allowed to access the memory on the computer they bought to play your games with. It's their computer not yours. Stop doing these things.
English
263
35
1.6K
186.2K
Vesil
Vesil@TexGT1·
@GrimisS @eron_wolf @riotgames thats a retarded analogy and you know it you dim witted fuck. you're not endangering anyones life by using the computer you paid for the way you want to use it. dipshits like you are the reason why the open web is falling apart & the reason why id checks are spreading.
English
12
0
110
7.8K
john
john@speakluve·
@lha7eyou @riotgames its just cheater bot accounts trying their best, cut them some slack
English
1
0
0
383
biggest hater of all🤍⭐️
@riotgames you guys complained soooo much about cheaters and how riots anti cheat never worked and now that they're finally taking a bigger step you guys are mad... for what exactly? cheaters know what they're doing and they deserve to be punished for it??
English
1
0
8
10.5K
john
john@speakluve·
@ChairmanMaoMao3 @newstart_2024 i have never broken any ikea furniture... i have a shelf from 1998 still going strong, idk if youre talking about chairs (since its in your name), but if you do youd have to be pretty fat to break them anyway, and at that point you should probably get some speciality chairs
English
0
0
8
425
LifeIs...🇨🇦
LifeIs...🇨🇦@ChairmanMaoMao3·
@newstart_2024 What a load of bs from this guy, no intelligent people would waste their time to buy ikea and 3 months later have to go shop for new furniture bc their IKEA furniture is broken
English
4
0
1
8.3K
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
“Rich people don’t buy furniture at Ikea.” Zlatan Ibrahimović’s instant reply: “But intelligent people do.” When his wife found a house with no furniture, the broker tried to shame them. Zlatan shut it down with one perfect line. Zero filter. Maximum swagger.
English
164
1.5K
35.3K
5.3M
john
john@speakluve·
@PearPokeball @HansMokeNiemann If they can’t prove he’s still cheating, wouldn’t it be fun to see how far he can go? Would be a waste of talent + a good story to just ban him..
English
1
0
0
167
JohnDough
JohnDough@PearPokeball·
@HansMokeNiemann In a game where cheating is very hard to detect, you have been proven a cheater multiple times online. It's true that "witchhunt" was handled badly but you're presenting yourself as the ultimate victim, when in reality, you probably should have been banned from FIDE ages ago.
English
1
0
17
3.5K
Hans Niemann
Hans Niemann@HansMokeNiemann·
If this part doesn’t convince you of the true character of the chess mafia I’m not sure what will. They lied and manipulated their closest partners, and when it came down to the day of judgment. They had absolutely no evidence and were forced to cover their tracks.
Hans Niemann tweet media
English
92
102
2.5K
195.3K
Branded
Branded@Domain_Impulse·
@buddhax09 @Awk20000 Why would that matter for her lawsuit, those things have no correlation with each other.
English
2
0
16
1.3K
yeet
yeet@Awk20000·
Emiru leaves the function in style “Da*n she whipping that sh*t”
English
80
16
2.4K
429.1K
Modernism
Modernism@Modernismcringe·
@burnthemallnero @veizau the problem isn't if a woman has done sexual acts its about how many people she's been with, if my wife has a body count of 2-3 that's fine because they were likely past exs, if she has a body count of over 5 that's a problem, she's talking about her sex life like its hook ups.
English
2
0
4
350
veizau
veizau@veizau·
FanFan had her viewers CONCERNED after she revealed what she does to men that sleep with her 😬👀
English
60
97
4.6K
562K
DiscussingFilm
DiscussingFilm@DiscussingFilm·
First trailer for the ‘HARRY POTTER’ series. Releasing this Christmas on HBO.
English
6.9K
34.8K
215.4K
61.6M
Ярмак ⚔️
Ярмак ⚔️@IMaridov49127·
@0xVeepul @DiscussingFilm My biggest problem with movies is the constant change in directors.. First two were great, but imo it all went downhill from there. Personally I hate last 4 movies with a passion. Would like to see consistency with these series
English
5
0
14
3K
john
john@speakluve·
@poisonousdwarf I didn’t deny it’s not harmful, im questioning why all these other harmful substances are legal, but this one isn’t?
English
1
0
0
20
Poisonousdwarf
Poisonousdwarf@poisonousdwarf·
@speakluve You see, there you go. By conflating known harmful drugs with another suddenly you assume the other one isn’t harmful at all. It is. Read the literature. “Whataboutism” isn’t a scientifically valid comparison technique.
English
1
0
0
22
Rock'n Roll of All
Rock'n Roll of All@rocknrollofall·
Is Paul McCartney telling the truth?
English
40
82
1K
156.8K
john
john@speakluve·
@poisonousdwarf @rocknrollofall i can name a lot of harmful legal substances, like the ones he used in the video - that's the point, not that its not harmful.
English
1
0
1
67
Poisonousdwarf
Poisonousdwarf@poisonousdwarf·
@rocknrollofall Years and years of detailed scientific research. You wonder how he had the time to be in the Beatles as well. Still, grown up people did the hard work for him and conclusively proved him dead wrong about it being harmless.
English
1
0
2
1.1K
Leerskee
Leerskee@BrandonMcUmber·
@christianparsa @iam_smx Seems like he's been drinking or took a small amount of the white powder. Dude won't stfu.
English
1
1
8
441
SMX 🇺🇸
SMX 🇺🇸@iam_smx·
That funny moment when Elon Musk wanted to check if SNL is actually live 😂 “Is Saturday Night Live actually live? or is there like a delay? we gonna find out Tonight if Saturday Night Live is actually Live, and the way that we are going to do this, I am going to take my...” 🫢
English
199
432
3.8K
442K
john
john@speakluve·
@Othnie1 @LeagueOfLegends @poptartdaooo Would have to be a separate game like wild rift, since controls would have to be adjusted completely for the controller. Don’t think the market for a console moba is big enough for them to put in all that work for it
English
0
0
0
60
sam
sam@poptartdaooo·
first time downloading league of legends
English
22
0
417
52.4K
john
john@speakluve·
@Naftul3 @HJensen10566 @validclipx He never admitted to sexually assaulting her dumbass, what he (and she) described was not sexual assault. That’s the whole issue/point?
English
1
0
0
93
validate
validate@validclipx·
Mizkif broke down in tears after seeing Emiru backtrack on the allegations she made four months ago, in which she claimed he SA’d her.Her lawyer claims she used the term ‘SA’ because she was emotional. He lost most of his viewers, friends, and brand deals because of this allegation 😬😯🤦‍♂️
English
230
175
4K
769.4K
PenRaffe
PenRaffe@PenRaffe1·
@speakluve @HJensen10566 @validclipx no the passage says that emiru accused him of SA and any reasonable viewer could determine that by the description of what happened to her that is was SA unlike the benson case where the accuser did not describe a sexual assault
English
1
0
1
667
john
john@speakluve·
@AkaAsmodeus @validclipx So you’re gonna look at the tweet, not read what it says, press comment, write this comment and press post? That’s crazy
English
1
0
3
102
john
john@speakluve·
@HJensen10566 @validclipx So what you’re saying is; he didn’t sexually assault her, yet she claimed he did publicly. You can throw words around as much as you want but I’d argue there is a very valid defamation case to be argued.
English
2
0
80
6.2K
Henrik Jensen
Henrik Jensen@HJensen10566·
She didn’t backtrack. Her defense simply argues, based on precedents, that the “SA” label can be treated as protected “emotional truth” when the underlying facts are disclosed. That’s not backtrackin, it’s just explaining how courts have interpreted similar situations. If Mizkif wants a defamation case, he needs to point to the specific factual statements in her story that he claims are false, not just argue about the label.
English
16
2
250
56.9K